GadgetVersus Smartphone Processor


HiSilicon Kirin 9000 vs Intel Xeon W-3223


HiSilicon Kirin 9000 on Amazon USA
Intel Xeon W-3223 on Amazon USA

Comparison of the technical characteristics between the processors, with the HiSilicon Kirin 9000 on one side and the Intel Xeon W-3223 on the other side. The first is dedicated to the smartphone sector, It has 8 cores, 8 threads, a maximum frequency of 3.1GHz. The second is used on the desktop segment, it has a total of 8 cores, 16 threads, its turbo frequency is set to 4.0 GHz. The following table also compares the lithography, the number of transistors (if indicated), the amount of cache memory, the maximum RAM memory capacity, the type of memory accepted, the release date, the maximum number of PCIe lanes, the values ​​obtained in Geekbench 4 and Cinebench R15.






Specifications:


Processor HiSilicon Kirin 9000 Intel Xeon W-3223
Market Smartphone Desktop
Family Kirin Cascade Lake
Part number(s), S-Spec Kirin 9000, Kirin 9000 5G CD8069504248402,
SRFFG
Release date Q4 2020 Q2 2019
Lithography 5 nm FinFET EUV 14 nm++
Cores 8 8
Threads 8 16
Base frequency 2.0 GHz 3.5 GHz
Turbo frequency 3.1 GHz 4.0 GHz
Energy cores 4x ARM Cortex-A55 @ 2.05 GHz -
High performance cores 1x ARM Cortex-A77 @ 3.13 GHz
3x ARM Cortex-A77 @ 2.54 GHz
-
Cache memory 2 MB 16.5 MB
Max memory capacity 8 GB 1 TB
Memory types LPDDR4X-2133, LPDDR5-2750 DDR4-2666
Max # of memory channels 4 6
Max memory bandwidth 44 GB/s 119.21 GB/s
TDP 6 W 160 W
GPU integrated graphics ARM Mali-G78 MP24 None
GPU execution units 24 -
GPU shading units 384 -
(Android 64-bit | Mac OS X 64-bit)
Geekbench 4 single core
4,693 4,911
(Android 64-bit | Mac OS X 64-bit)
Geekbench 4 multi-core
13,767 32,746
(SGEMM)
GFLOPS performance
126.98 GFLOPS 915 GFLOPS
(Multi-core / watt performance)
Performance / watt ratio
2,295 pts / W 205 pts / W
Amazon
eBay




We can better compare what are the technical differences between the two processors. We see that the two processors have an equivalent number of cores, the turbo frequency of Intel Xeon W-3223 is bigger, that the PDT of HiSilicon Kirin 9000 is lower. The HiSilicon Kirin 9000 was designed earlier.

Performances :


Performance comparison between the two processors, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark software such as Geekbench 4.


There are still no results in the benchmark platforms for at least one of these processors. Please come back later.

Equivalence:

HiSilicon Kirin 9000 Intel equivalentHiSilicon Kirin 9000 AMD equivalentIntel Xeon W-3223 AMD equivalent

See also:

HiSilicon Kirin 9000E

Smartphones with the processor HiSilicon Kirin 9000:

Huawei Mate 40 ProHuawei Mate 40 Pro+Huawei Mate 40 RS Porsche Design






GadgetVersus.com © 2021 - Privacy policy - Advertising policy

Disclaimer:

When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

This page includes affiliate links for which the administrator of GadgetVersus may earn a commission at no extra cost to you should you make a purchase. These links are indicated using the hashtag #ad.


Information:

We do not assume any responsibility for the data displayed on our website. Please use at your own risk. Some or all of this data may be out of date or incomplete, please refer to the technical page on the respective manufacturer's website to find the latest up-to-date information regarding the specifics of these products.


Trading System Forex W3Ask W3Ask Brasil W3Ask Deutschland W3Ask España W3Ask France W3Ask Italia W3Ask Nederland