HiSilicon Kirin 9000 vs HiSilicon Kirin 650
Comparison of the technical characteristics between the processors, with the HiSilicon Kirin 9000 on one side and the HiSilicon Kirin 650 on the other side. The first is dedicated to the smartphone sector, It has 8 cores, 8 threads, a maximum frequency of 3.1GHz. The second is used on the smartphone segment, it has a total of 8 cores, 8 threads, its turbo frequency is set to 2.1 GHz. The following table also compares the lithography, the number of transistors (if indicated), the amount of cache memory, the maximum RAM memory capacity, the type of memory accepted, the release date, the maximum number of PCIe lanes, the values obtained in Geekbench 4 and Cinebench R15.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
This page contains references to products from one or more of our advertisers. We may receive compensation when you click on links to those products. For an explanation of our advertising policy, please
visit this page.
Specifications:
Processor | |
HiSilicon Kirin 9000 |
| | |
HiSilicon Kirin 650 |
| |
Market | |
Smartphone |
| | |
Smartphone |
| |
Family | |
Kirin |
| | |
Kirin |
| |
Part number(s), S-Spec | |
Kirin 9000, Kirin 9000 5G |
| | |
Kirin 650 |
| |
Release date | |
Q4 2020 |
| | |
Q2 2016 |
| |
Lithography | |
5 nm FinFET EUV |
| | |
16 nm FinFET+ |
| |
Cores | |
8 |
| | |
8 |
| |
Threads | |
8 |
| | |
8 |
| |
Base frequency | |
2.0 GHz |
| | |
1.7 GHz |
| |
Turbo frequency | |
3.1 GHz |
| | |
2.1 GHz |
| |
Energy cores | |
4x ARM Cortex-A55 @ 2.05 GHz |
| | |
4x ARM Cortex-A53 @ 1.7 GHz |
| |
High performance cores | |
1x ARM Cortex-A77 @ 3.13 GHz
3x ARM Cortex-A77 @ 2.54 GHz |
| | |
4x ARM Cortex-A53 @ 2.12 GHz |
| |
Cache memory | |
2 MB |
| | |
- |
| |
Max memory capacity | |
8 GB |
| | |
4 GB |
| |
Memory types | |
LPDDR4X-2133, LPDDR5-2750 |
| | |
LPDDR3-933 |
| |
Max # of memory channels | |
4 |
| | |
2 |
| |
TDP | |
6 W |
| | |
5 W |
| |
GPU integrated graphics | |
ARM Mali-G78 MP24 |
| | |
ARM Mali-T830 MP2 |
| |
GPU execution units | |
24 |
| | |
2 |
| |
GPU shading units | |
384 |
| | |
32 |
| |
GPU clock rate | |
- |
| | |
900 MHz |
| |
GPU FP32 floating point | |
- |
| | |
40.8 GFLOPS |
| |
AnTuTu | |
689,081 |
| | |
53,050 |
| |
(Android 64-bit) Geekbench 4 single core | |
4,693 |
| | |
804 |
| |
(Android 64-bit) Geekbench 4 multi-core | |
13,767 |
| | |
3,334 |
| |
(Android) Geekbench 5 single core | |
963 |
| | |
169 |
| |
(Android) Geekbench 5 multi-core | |
3,452 |
| | |
772 |
| |
(SGEMM) GFLOPS performance | |
126.98 GFLOPS |
| | |
21.58 GFLOPS |
| |
(Multi-core / watt performance) Performance / watt ratio | |
2,295 pts / W |
| | |
667 pts / W |
| |
Amazon | |
 |
| | |
 |
| |
eBay | |
 |
| | |
 |
| |
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
We can better compare what are the technical differences between the two processors. We see that the two processors have an equivalent number of cores, the maximum frequency of HiSilicon Kirin 9000 is greater, that the thermal dissipation power of HiSilicon Kirin 650 is less. The HiSilicon Kirin 9000 was designed earlier.
Performances :
Performance comparison between the two processors, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark software such as Geekbench 4.
The difference is 1199%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
AnTuTu is one of the most popular apps in the world to evaluate and compare the power of a mobile device with the competition. It tests above all the power of calculation, the display of Web pages, the modeling of decorations in 3D, the management of the memory, the transfer of data.
On Android 64-bit:
In single core, the difference is 484%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 313%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
Geekbench 4 is a complete benchmark platform with several types of tests, including data compression, images, AES encryption, SQL encoding, HTML, PDF file rendering, matrix computation, Fast Fourier Transform, 3D object simulation, photo editing, memory testing. This allows us to better visualize the respective power of these devices. For each result, we took an average of 250 values on the famous benchmark software.
On Android:
In single core, the difference is 470%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 347%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
Geekbench 5 is a software for measuring the performance of a computer system, for fixed devices, mobile devices, servers. This platform makes it possible to better compare the power of the CPU, the computing power and to compare it with similar or totally different systems. Geekbench 5 includes new workloads that represent work tasks and applications that we can find in reality.
Equivalence:
HiSilicon Kirin 9000 Intel equivalentHiSilicon Kirin 9000 AMD equivalentHiSilicon Kirin 650 Intel equivalentHiSilicon Kirin 650 AMD equivalentSee also:
HiSilicon Kirin 9000EHiSilicon Kirin 655HiSilicon Kirin 658HiSilicon Kirin 659Smartphones with the processor HiSilicon Kirin 9000:
Huawei Mate 40 ProHuawei Mate 40 Pro+Huawei Mate 40 RS Porsche DesignSmartphones with the processor HiSilicon Kirin 650:
Honor 5cHuawei P9 Lite