GadgetVersus Smartphone Processor Graphics card


Dual Intel Xeon Platinum 8280 Specs


Dual Intel Xeon Platinum 8280 on Amazon USA


Specifications of the Dual Intel Xeon Platinum 8280 processor dedicated to the server sector, it has 28 cores, 56 threads, a maximum frequency of 4.0GHz. The table below makes it possible to observe well the lithography, the number of transistors (if present), the offered cache memory, the maximum capacity of RAM memory that we can get, the type of compatible memory, the release date, the maximum number of PCIe lanes, the values obtained in the Passmark platform, Cinebench R15 and Geekbench 4.






Specifications:


Processor Dual Intel Xeon Platinum 8280
Market Server
Family Cascade Lake
Part number(s), S-Spec CD8069504228001,
SRF9P
Release date Q2 2019
Lithography 14 nm
Cores 56
Threads 112
Base frequency 2.7 GHz
Turbo frequency 4.0 GHz
Bus speed 20.8 GT/s
Cache memory 77.0 MB
Max memory capacity 2 TB
Memory types DDR4-2933
Max # of memory channels 12
Max memory bandwidth 262.26 GB/s
Max PCIe lanes 96
TDP 410 W
Suggested PSU 1000W ATX Power Supply #ad
GPU integrated graphics None
Socket LGA3647
Compatible motherboard Socket LGA 3647 Motherboard #ad
Maximum temperature 84°C
Cinebench R15 single thread 90
Cinebench R15 multi-thread 7,193
Cinebench R20 single thread 395
Cinebench R20 multi-thread 18,404
PassMark single thread 2,210
PassMark CPU Mark 43,940
(Linux 64-bit)
Geekbench 4 single core
4,301
(Linux 64-bit)
Geekbench 4 multi-core
109,442
(SGEMM)
GFLOPS performance
3,260 GFLOPS
(Multi-core / watt performance)
Performance / watt ratio
267 pts / W
Amazon
eBay



Performances :


Performance comparison between this processor and those of equivalent power, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark softwares such as Geekbench 4.

Suggested PSU: We assume that we have An ATX computer case, a high end graphics card, 16GB RAM, a 512GB SSD, a 1TB HDD hard drive, a Blu-Ray drive. We will have to rely on a more powerful power supply if we want to have several graphics cards, several monitors, more memory, etc.

Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.




Performance comparison on the Cinebench R15 benchmark platform for IT devices:


Cinebench R15 - Multi-thread & single thread score
Dual AMD EPYC 7742#ad 145
11,332
AMD EPYC 7H12#ad 146
9,751
Dual AMD EPYC 7H12#ad 146
8,757
Dual Intel Xeon Platinum 8259CL#ad 84
7,338
Dual Intel Xeon Platinum 8280#ad 90
7,193
Dual Intel Xeon Platinum 8260#ad 74
6,442
Intel Xeon Platinum 8280L#ad 95
4,565
Dual Intel Xeon Silver 4216#ad 126
4,228
Dual AMD EPYC 7502#ad 84
4,104



Cinebench R15 evaluates the performance of CPU calculations by restoring a photorealistic 3D scene. The scene has 2,000 objects, 300,000 polygons, uses sharp and fuzzy reflections, bright areas, shadows, procedural shaders, antialiasing, and so on. The faster the rendering of the scene is created, the more powerful the PC is, with a high number of points.


Performance comparison on the Cinebench R20 benchmark platform for computers:


Cinebench R20 - Multi-thread & single thread score
Dual AMD EPYC 7763#ad 430
43,253
Dual AMD EPYC 7H12#ad 334
30,211
Dual AMD EPYC 7742#ad 395
29,937
AMD EPYC 7H12#ad 334
22,352
Dual Intel Xeon Platinum 8280L#ad 190
19,146
Dual Intel Xeon Platinum 8280#ad 395
18,404
Dual Intel Xeon Platinum 8259CL#ad 198
17,340
Dual Intel Xeon Platinum 8260#ad 168
14,696
AMD EPYC 7402P#ad 274
10,581
Dual AMD EPYC 7502#ad 184
10,058



Cinebench R20 is a multi-platform test software which allows to evaluate the hardware capacities of a device such as a computer, a tablet, a server. This version of Cinebench takes into account recent developments in processors with multiple cores and the latest improvements in rendering techniques. The evaluation is ultimately even more relevant.


Performance comparison on the Passmark benchmark platform for computing machines:


PassMark - CPU Mark
Dual AMD EPYC 7742#ad 2,310
55,580
AMD EPYC 7452#ad 2,050
53,080
Dual Intel Xeon Platinum 8260#ad 1,860
51,377
Dual AMD EPYC 7542#ad 2,150
46,720
AMD EPYC 7502P#ad 1,767
46,170
Dual Intel Xeon Platinum 8280#ad 2,210
43,940
Dual Intel Xeon Gold 6230#ad 1,867
40,872
Dual AMD EPYC 7302#ad 1,592
40,152
AMD EPYC 7402P#ad 1,732
39,108
Intel Xeon Gold 6248R#ad 2,262
38,511



PassMark is a benchmarking software that performs several performance tests including prime numbers, integers, floating point, compression, physics, extended instructions, encoding, sorting. The higher the score is, the higher is the device capacity.







On Windows: performance comparison in Geekbench 4 with Windows operating system.


Geekbench 4 - Multi-core & single core score - Windows 64-bit
Dual Intel Xeon Gold 6230#ad 4,222
44,028
Intel Xeon Gold 6230#ad 4,746
42,576
Dual AMD EPYC 7742#ad 4,337
41,576
Dual AMD EPYC 7H12#ad 4,052
40,989
Dual Intel Xeon Platinum 8260#ad 4,431
37,413
Dual Intel Xeon Platinum 8280#ad 4,576
36,105
Intel Xeon Platinum 8259CL#ad 4,498
35,983
Dual Intel Xeon Silver 4216#ad 3,691
35,256
AMD EPYC 7702#ad 4,216
33,501
AMD EPYC 7502P#ad 3,475
32,836





On Linux: performance comparison in Geekbench 4 with Linux operating system.


Geekbench 4 - Multi-core & single core score - Linux 64-bit
AMD EPYC 7702#ad 2,947
115,372
Quad Intel Xeon Gold 6230#ad 4,788
114,162
AMD EPYC 7702P#ad 4,717
112,942
Quad Intel Xeon Platinum 8260#ad 4,340
109,981
Dual Intel Xeon Platinum 8259CL#ad 4,470
109,587
Dual Intel Xeon Platinum 8280#ad 4,301
109,442
AMD EPYC 7543#ad 6,132
107,489
Dual Intel Xeon Gold 6248R#ad 4,376
103,899
Dual AMD EPYC 7502#ad 4,580
103,791
Dual Intel Xeon Gold 6258R#ad 4,989
93,112



Geekbench 4 is a complete benchmark platform with several types of tests, including data compression, images, AES encryption, SQL encoding, HTML, PDF file rendering, matrix computation, Fast Fourier Transform, 3D object simulation, photo editing, memory testing. This allows us to better visualize the respective power of these devices. For each result, we took an average of 250 values on the famous benchmark software.




List of comparisons:

AllwinnerAMDAMD A10AMD A4AMD A6AMD A8AMD A9AMD AthlonAMD EPYCAMD JaguarAMD OpteronAMD PhenomAMD RyzenAMD Ryzen 1000AMD Ryzen 2000AMD Ryzen 3AMD Ryzen 3 1000AMD Ryzen 3 2000AMD Ryzen 3 3000AMD Ryzen 3 4000AMD Ryzen 3 5000AMD Ryzen 3000AMD Ryzen 4000AMD Ryzen 5AMD Ryzen 5 1000AMD Ryzen 5 2000AMD Ryzen 5 3000AMD Ryzen 5 4000AMD Ryzen 5 5000AMD Ryzen 5000AMD Ryzen 7AMD Ryzen 7 1000AMD Ryzen 7 2000AMD Ryzen 7 3000AMD Ryzen 7 4000AMD Ryzen 7 5000AMD Ryzen 9AMD Ryzen 9 3000AMD Ryzen 9 4000AMD Ryzen 9 5000AMD Ryzen ThreadripperAMD Ryzen Threadripper 1000AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2000AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3000AMD Ryzen Threadripper 5000AMD ZenAMD Zen 2AMD Zen 3AMD Zen+AmlogicAppleARMARM CortexARM Cortex-A17ARM Cortex-A53ARM Cortex-A55ARM Cortex-A57ARM Cortex-A7ARM Cortex-A72ARM Cortex-A73ARM Cortex-A75ARM Cortex-A76ARM Cortex-A8ARM Cortex-A9BroadcomDeca coreDodeca coreDual AMDDual AMD EPYCDual AMD OpteronDual coreDual Intel XeonDual Intel Xeon PlatinumHexa coreHexadeca coreHiSiliconHiSilicon KirinIcosi coreIngenicIntelIntel AtomIntel BroadwellIntel Cascade LakeIntel Cascade Lake-XIntel CeleronIntel Coffee LakeIntel Comet LakeIntel CoreIntel Core 10000Intel Core 11000Intel Core 2 DuoIntel Core 2 QuadIntel Core 7000Intel Core 8000Intel Core 9000Intel Core i3Intel Core i3-10000Intel Core i3-11000Intel Core i3-7000Intel Core i3-8000Intel Core i3-9000Intel Core i5Intel Core i5-10000Intel Core i5-11000Intel Core i5-4000Intel Core i5-7000Intel Core i5-8000Intel Core i5-9000Intel Core i7Intel Core i7-10000Intel Core i7-11000Intel Core i7-7000Intel Core i7-8000Intel Core i7-9000Intel Core i9Intel Core i9-10000Intel Core i9-11000Intel Core i9-7000Intel Core i9-8000Intel Core i9-9000Intel Core m3Intel HaswellIntel Ice LakeIntel Ivy BridgeIntel Kaby LakeIntel PentiumIntel Pentium 4Intel Pentium GoldIntel Pentium IIIIntel Rocket LakeIntel Sandy BridgeIntel SkylakeIntel Skylake-XIntel Tiger LakeIntel XeonIntel Xeon E5Intel Xeon GoldIntel Xeon PlatinumIntel Xeon WLGA1150LGA1151MediaTekMediaTek DimensityMicrosoftMono coreNvidiaNvidia TegraOcta coreOcta Intel XeonOctodeca coreQuad coreQuad Intel XeonQualcommQualcomm Kryo 585Qualcomm SnapdragonRockchipSamsungSamsung ExynosSamsung Exynos 7Samsung Exynos 7 OctaSamsung Exynos 9Samsung Exynos 9 OctaTessaradeca coreTexas InstrumentsUnisocXiaomiProcessors groups

List of benchmarks:

Cinebench R15Cinebench R20Geekbench 4 on LinuxGeekbench 4 on WindowsPassMarkGFLOPS performance

Equivalence:

Dual Intel Xeon Platinum 8280 AMD equivalent

See also:

Dual Intel Xeon Platinum 8280LDual Intel Xeon Platinum 8284Intel Xeon Platinum 8280Intel Xeon Platinum 8280LIntel Xeon Platinum 8284Octa Intel Xeon Platinum 8280LOcta Intel Xeon Platinum 8284Quad Intel Xeon Platinum 8280LQuad Intel Xeon Platinum 8284






GadgetVersus.com © 2021 - Information - XML sitemap - Privacy policy - Advertising policy - Contact

Disclaimer:

When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

This page includes affiliate links for which the administrator of GadgetVersus may earn a commission at no extra cost to you should you make a purchase. These links are indicated using the hashtag #ad.


Information:

We do not assume any responsibility for the data displayed on our website. Please use at your own risk. Some or all of this data may be out of date or incomplete, please refer to the technical page on the respective manufacturer's website to find the latest up-to-date information regarding the specifics of these products.


Trading System Forex W3Ask W3Ask Brasil W3Ask Deutschland W3Ask España W3Ask France W3Ask Italia W3Ask Nederland