Dual Intel Xeon E5-2699 v4 Specs


Dual Intel Xeon E5-2699 v4 on Amazon USA


Specifications of the Dual Intel Xeon E5-2699 v4 processor dedicated to the server sector, it has 22 cores, 44 threads, a maximum frequency of 3.6GHz. The table below makes it possible to observe well the lithography, the number of transistors (if present), the offered cache memory, the maximum capacity of RAM memory that we can get, the type of compatible memory, the release date, the maximum number of PCIe lanes, the values obtained in the Passmark platform, Cinebench R15 and Geekbench 4.






Specifications:


Processor Dual Intel Xeon E5-2699 v4
Market (main) Server
ISA x86-64 (64 bit)
Microarchitecture Broadwell
Core name Broadwell-EP
Family Xeon E5-2600 v4
Part number(s), S-Spec CM8066002022506,
QK10, QK7J, SR2JS
Release date Q1 2016
Lithography 14 nm
Transistors 14,400,000,000
Cores 44
Threads 88
Base frequency 2.2 GHz
Turbo frequency 3.6 GHz
Bus speed 19.2 GT/s
Cache memory 110 MB
Max memory capacity 300 GB
Memory types DDR4 1600/1866/2133/2400
Max # of memory channels 8
Max memory bandwidth 153.6 GB/s
Max PCIe lanes 80
TDP 290 W
Suggested PSU 800W ATX Power Supply
GPU integrated graphics None
Socket LGA2011-3
Compatible motherboard Socket LGA 2011-3 Motherboard 
Maximum temperature 79°C
CPU-Z single thread 320
CPU-Z multi thread 14,809
Cinebench R15 single thread 140
Cinebench R15 multi-thread 5,315
Cinebench R20 single thread 210
Cinebench R20 multi-thread 12,100
Cinebench R23 single thread 544
Cinebench R23 multi-thread 29,514
PassMark single thread 2,040
PassMark CPU Mark 37,760
(Linux 64-bit)
Geekbench 4 single core
3,664
(Linux 64-bit)
Geekbench 4 multi-core
67,269
(Linux)
Geekbench 5 single core
792
(Linux)
Geekbench 5 multi-core
20,412
(SGEMM)
GFLOPS performance
1,534.1 GFLOPS
(Multi-core / watt performance)
Performance / watt ratio
232 pts / W
Amazon
eBay



Performances :


Performance comparison between this processor and those of equivalent power, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark softwares such as Geekbench 4.

Suggested PSU: We assume that we have An ATX computer case, a high end graphics card, 16GB RAM, a 512GB SSD, a 1TB HDD hard drive, a Blu-Ray drive. We will have to rely on a more powerful power supply if we want to have several graphics cards, several monitors, more memory, etc.

Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.




Performance comparison on the CPU-Z benchmark software for IT processors:


CPU-Z - Multi-thread & single thread score
Dual AMD EPYC 7H12 392
41,506
Dual AMD EPYC 7702 397
39,875
Dual AMD EPYC 7742 408
26,692
AMD EPYC 7H12 395
24,822
AMD EPYC 7742 407
23,138
Dual Intel Xeon E5-2699 v4 320
14,809
AMD EPYC 7502P 386
14,447
Dual Intel Xeon Silver 4216 365
12,029
AMD EPYC 7302 393
8,864
Intel Xeon Silver 4216 312
6,415



CPU-Z is a system information software that provides the name of the processor, its model number, the codename, the cache levels, the package, the process. It can also gives data about the mainboard, the memory. It makes real time measurement, with finally a benchmark for the single thread, as well as for the multi thread.


Performance comparison on the Cinebench R15 benchmark platform for IT devices:


Cinebench R15 - Multi-thread & single thread score
AMD EPYC 7H12 146
9,751
Dual AMD EPYC 7H12 146
8,757
Dual Intel Xeon Platinum 8259CL 84
7,338
Dual Intel Xeon Platinum 8280 90
7,193
Dual Intel Xeon Platinum 8260 74
6,442
Dual Intel Xeon E5-2699 v4 140
5,315
Intel Xeon Platinum 8280L 95
4,565
Dual Intel Xeon Silver 4216 126
4,228
Dual AMD EPYC 7502 84
4,104
AMD EPYC 7402P 131
3,884



Cinebench R15 evaluates the performance of CPU calculations by restoring a photorealistic 3D scene. The scene has 2,000 objects, 300,000 polygons, uses sharp and fuzzy reflections, bright areas, shadows, procedural shaders, antialiasing, and so on. The faster the rendering of the scene is created, the more powerful the PC is, with a high number of points.


Performance comparison on the Cinebench R20 benchmark platform for computers:


Cinebench R20 - Multi-thread & single thread score
AMD EPYC 7H12 334
22,352
Dual Intel Xeon Platinum 8280L 190
19,146
Dual Intel Xeon Platinum 8280 395
18,404
Dual Intel Xeon Platinum 8259CL 198
17,340
Dual Intel Xeon Platinum 8260 168
14,696
Dual Intel Xeon E5-2699 v4 210
12,100
AMD EPYC 7402P 274
10,581
Dual AMD EPYC 7502 184
10,058
Dual Intel Xeon Silver 4216 296
10,023
Dual Intel Xeon Silver 4210 417
6,730



Cinebench R20 is a multi-platform test software which allows to evaluate the hardware capacities of a device such as a computer, a tablet, a server. This version of Cinebench takes into account recent developments in processors with multiple cores and the latest improvements in rendering techniques. The evaluation is ultimately even more relevant.


Performance comparison on the Cinebench R23 benchmark platform for computer processors:


Cinebench R23 - Multi-thread & single thread score
Intel Xeon Platinum 8280L 1,027
49,866
AMD EPYC 7702P 982
48,947
AMD EPYC 7702 979
48,833
Dual Intel Xeon Platinum 8280 981
45,720
Dual Intel Xeon Platinum 8259CL 492
43,103
Dual Intel Xeon E5-2699 v4 544
29,514
Intel Xeon E-2288G 1,305
10,816



Cinebench R23 is cross-platform testing software that allows you to assess the hardware capabilities of a device such as a computer, tablet, server. This version of Cinebench takes into account recent developments in processors with multiple cores and the latest improvements in rendering techniques. The evaluation is ultimately even more relevant. The test scene contains no less than 2,000 objects and more than 300,000 polygons in total.


Performance comparison on the Passmark benchmark platform for computing machines:


PassMark - CPU Mark
Dual Intel Xeon Platinum 8280 2,210
43,940
Dual Intel Xeon Gold 6230 1,867
40,872
Dual AMD EPYC 7302 1,592
40,152
AMD EPYC 7402P 1,732
39,108
Intel Xeon Gold 6248R 2,262
38,511
Dual Intel Xeon E5-2699 v4 2,040
37,760
AMD EPYC 7302 2,070
34,249
AMD EPYC 7282 1,998
31,515
Intel Xeon Platinum 8259CL 1,853
31,495
Dual Intel Xeon Silver 4216 1,799
26,161



PassMark is a benchmarking software that performs several performance tests including prime numbers, integers, floating point, compression, physics, extended instructions, encoding, sorting. The higher the score is, the higher is the device capacity.







On Windows: performance comparison in Geekbench 4 with Windows operating system.


Geekbench 4 - Multi-core & single core score - Windows 64-bit
AMD EPYC 7702 4,216
33,501
AMD EPYC 7502P 3,475
32,836
Intel Xeon Gold 6248R 3,857
32,735
Dual AMD EPYC 7302 3,132
31,835
Intel Xeon E-2288G 5,918
31,746
Dual Intel Xeon E5-2699 v4 3,453
31,453
AMD EPYC 7742 4,327
29,976
Dual AMD EPYC 7702 3,895
29,032
AMD EPYC 7402P 3,567
28,968
Intel Xeon Silver 4216 3,570
28,219





On Linux: performance comparison in Geekbench 4 with Linux operating system.


Geekbench 4 - Multi-core & single core score - Linux 64-bit
Dual Intel Xeon Gold 6230 4,093
78,552
AMD EPYC 7742 4,662
76,317
AMD EPYC 7502P 4,624
75,240
AMD EPYC 7402P 4,452
74,485
AMD EPYC 7502 4,586
69,926
Dual Intel Xeon E5-2699 v4 3,664
67,269
Intel Xeon Platinum 8280 4,371
61,505
Dual Intel Xeon Silver 4216 3,277
59,224
Dual AMD EPYC 7302 3,406
57,221
Intel Xeon Gold 6230 4,837
53,606



Geekbench 4 is a complete benchmark platform with several types of tests, including data compression, images, AES encryption, SQL encoding, HTML, PDF file rendering, matrix computation, Fast Fourier Transform, 3D object simulation, photo editing, memory testing. This allows us to better visualize the respective power of these devices. For each result, we took an average of 250 values on the famous benchmark software.


On Windows: performance comparison in Geekbench 5 with Windows operating system.


Geekbench 5 - Multi-core & single core score - Windows
Dual Intel Xeon Platinum 8280L 874
22,990
Dual Intel Xeon Platinum 8259CL 961
21,706
Dual Intel Xeon E5-2699 v4 843
20,685
Dual AMD EPYC 7H12 950
20,580
Dual Intel Xeon Platinum 8260 832
20,441
Dual AMD EPYC 7542 939
18,119
Dual Intel Xeon Gold 6258R 998
17,405





On Linux: performance comparison in Geekbench 5 with Linux operating system.


Geekbench 5 - Multi-core & single core score - Linux
AMD EPYC 7502P 1,053
23,099
Dual AMD EPYC 7302 883
22,540
AMD EPYC 7402P 1,046
21,892
Dual Intel Xeon Gold 6230 1,056
21,758
Intel Xeon Platinum 8272CL 926
20,788
Dual Intel Xeon E5-2699 v4 792
20,412
Intel Xeon Platinum 8259CL 984
19,704
Dual Intel Xeon Gold 6258R 926
19,660
Intel Xeon Gold 6248R 1,038
19,187
Intel Xeon Platinum 8260 897
18,301



Geekbench 5 is a software for measuring the performance of a computer system, for fixed devices, mobile devices, servers. This platform makes it possible to better compare the power of the CPU, the computing power and to compare it with similar or totally different systems. Geekbench 5 includes new workloads that represent work tasks and applications that we can find in reality.




List of comparisons:

AllwinnerAMDAMD A10AMD A4AMD A6AMD A8AMD A9AMD AthlonAMD EPYCAMD JaguarAMD OpteronAMD PhenomAMD RyzenAMD Ryzen 1000AMD Ryzen 2000AMD Ryzen 3AMD Ryzen 3 1000AMD Ryzen 3 2000AMD Ryzen 3 3000AMD Ryzen 3 4000AMD Ryzen 3 5000AMD Ryzen 3000AMD Ryzen 4000AMD Ryzen 5AMD Ryzen 5 1000AMD Ryzen 5 2000AMD Ryzen 5 3000AMD Ryzen 5 4000AMD Ryzen 5 5000AMD Ryzen 5000AMD Ryzen 7AMD Ryzen 7 1000AMD Ryzen 7 2000AMD Ryzen 7 3000AMD Ryzen 7 4000AMD Ryzen 7 5000AMD Ryzen 9AMD Ryzen 9 3000AMD Ryzen 9 4000AMD Ryzen 9 5000AMD Ryzen ThreadripperAMD Ryzen Threadripper 1000AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2000AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3000AMD Ryzen Threadripper 5000AMD ZenAMD Zen 2AMD Zen 3AMD Zen+AmlogicAppleARMARM CortexARM Cortex-A17ARM Cortex-A53ARM Cortex-A55ARM Cortex-A57ARM Cortex-A7ARM Cortex-A72ARM Cortex-A73ARM Cortex-A75ARM Cortex-A76ARM Cortex-A8ARM Cortex-A9BroadcomDeca coreDodeca coreDual AMDDual AMD EPYCDual AMD OpteronDual coreDual Intel XeonDual Intel Xeon PlatinumHexa coreHexadeca coreHiSiliconHiSilicon KirinIcosi coreIngenicIntelIntel AtomIntel BroadwellIntel Cascade LakeIntel Cascade Lake-XIntel CeleronIntel Coffee LakeIntel Comet LakeIntel CoreIntel Core 10000Intel Core 11000Intel Core 2 DuoIntel Core 2 QuadIntel Core 7000Intel Core 8000Intel Core 9000Intel Core i3Intel Core i3-10000Intel Core i3-11000Intel Core i3-7000Intel Core i3-8000Intel Core i3-9000Intel Core i5Intel Core i5-10000Intel Core i5-11000Intel Core i5-4000Intel Core i5-7000Intel Core i5-8000Intel Core i5-9000Intel Core i7Intel Core i7-10000Intel Core i7-11000Intel Core i7-7000Intel Core i7-8000Intel Core i7-9000Intel Core i9Intel Core i9-10000Intel Core i9-11000Intel Core i9-7000Intel Core i9-8000Intel Core i9-9000Intel Core m3Intel HaswellIntel Ice LakeIntel Ivy BridgeIntel Kaby LakeIntel PentiumIntel Pentium 4Intel Pentium GoldIntel Pentium IIIntel Pentium IIIIntel Rocket LakeIntel Sandy BridgeIntel SkylakeIntel Skylake-XIntel Tiger LakeIntel XeonIntel Xeon E5Intel Xeon GoldIntel Xeon PlatinumIntel Xeon WLGA1150LGA1151MediaTekMediaTek DimensityMicrosoftMono coreNvidiaNvidia TegraOcta coreOcta Intel XeonOctodeca coreQuad coreQuad Intel XeonQualcommQualcomm Kryo 585Qualcomm SnapdragonRockchipSamsungSamsung ExynosSamsung Exynos 7Samsung Exynos 7 OctaSamsung Exynos 9Samsung Exynos 9 OctaTessaradeca coreTexas InstrumentsUnisocXiaomiProcessors groups

List of benchmarks:

CPU-ZCinebench R15Cinebench R20Cinebench R23Geekbench 4 on LinuxGeekbench 4 on WindowsGeekbench 5 on LinuxGeekbench 5 on WindowsPassMarkGFLOPS performance

Equivalence:

Dual Intel Xeon E5-2699 v4 AMD equivalent

See also:

Dual Intel Xeon E5-2699 v3Intel Xeon E5-2699 v3Intel Xeon E5-2699 v4






GadgetVersus.com © 2021 - Information - XML sitemap - Privacy policy - Advertising policy - Contact

Disclaimer:

When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

This page includes affiliate links for which the administrator of GadgetVersus may earn a commission at no extra cost to you should you make a purchase. These links are indicated using the hashtag #ad.


Information:

We do not assume any responsibility for the data displayed on our website. Please use at your own risk. Some or all of this data may be out of date or incomplete, please refer to the technical page on the respective manufacturer's website to find the latest up-to-date information regarding the specifics of these products.


Trading System Forex W3Ask W3Ask Brasil W3Ask Deutschland W3Ask España W3Ask France W3Ask Italia W3Ask Nederland