FRBroadcom BCM2711 vs Rockchip RK3328
Comparison of the technical characteristics between the processors, with the Broadcom BCM2711 on one side and the Rockchip RK3328 on the other side, also their respective performances with the benchmarks. The first is dedicated to the single-board computer sector, It has 4 cores, 4 threads, a maximum frequency of 1,5GHz. The second is used on the single-board computer segment, it has a total of 4 cores, 4 threads, its turbo frequency is set to 1,5 GHz. The following table also compares the lithography, the number of transistors (if indicated), the amount of cache memory, the maximum RAM memory capacity, the type of memory accepted, the release date, the maximum number of PCIe lanes, the values obtained in Geekbench and Cinebench.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
This page contains references to products from one or more of our advertisers. We may receive compensation when you click on links to those products. For an explanation of our advertising policy, please visit this page.
Specification comparison:
| Processor | Broadcom BCM2711 | Rockchip RK3328 | ||||||
| Market (main) | Single-board computer | Single-board computer | ||||||
| ISA | ARMv8-A (64-bit) | ARMv8-A (64-bit) | ||||||
| Microarchitecture | Cortex-A72 | Cortex-A53 | ||||||
| Family | BCM | RK33 Series | ||||||
| Part number(s), S-Spec | BCM2711 | RK3328 | ||||||
| Release date | Q2 2019 | Q1 2017 | ||||||
| Lithography | 28 nm | 28 nm HKMG | ||||||
| Cores | 4 | 4 | ||||||
| Threads | 4 | 4 | ||||||
| Base frequency | 1,5 GHz | 1,5 GHz | ||||||
| Turbo frequency | - | - | ||||||
| High performance cores | 4x ARM Cortex-A72 @ 1,5 GHz |
4x ARM Cortex-A53 @ 1,51 GHz | ||||||
| Cache memory | 1 MB |
256 KB | ||||||
| Max memory capacity | 8 GB | 4 GB | ||||||
| Memory types | LPDDR4-3200 SDRAM |
DDR3, DDR3L, LPDDR3, DDR4 | ||||||
| Max PCIe lanes | 4 | 4 | ||||||
| TDP | 8 W |
5 W | ||||||
| GPU integrated graphics | Broadcom VideoCore VI | ARM Mali-450 MP2 | ||||||
| GPU execution units | 4 | 2 | ||||||
| GPU shading units | 64 | 32 | ||||||
| GPU base clock | 500 MHz | 300 MHz | ||||||
| GPU boost clock | 500 MHz | 750 MHz | ||||||
| GPU FP32 floating point | 32 GFLOPS | 23,8 GFLOPS | ||||||
| Socket(s) | SoC | SoC | ||||||
| Drystone MIPS | 22.740 DMIPS | 13.892 DMIPS | ||||||
| Max display resolution | 4K@60fps |
- | ||||||
| Video decoding | H.265 4K@60fps, H.264 1080p@60fps |
- | ||||||
| Video encoding | H.264 1080p@30fps |
- | ||||||
| Modem | 10/100/1000M Gigabit Ethernet |
- | ||||||
| Connectivity | USB 2.0, USB 3.0, HDMI 2.0 |
- | ||||||
| Wi-Fi | 2.4GHz/5GHz 802.11 b/g/n/ac |
- | ||||||
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 4.2 |
- | ||||||
| Audio | I2S |
- | ||||||
| PassMark CPU Mark | 1.015 | 480 | ||||||
| (Windows | Android) Geekbench 4 single core | 415 | 563 | ||||||
| (Windows | Android) Geekbench 4 multi-core | 958 | 1.454 | ||||||
| (Linux | Android) Geekbench 5 single core | 233 | 105 | ||||||
| (Linux | Android) Geekbench 5 multi-core | 674 | 325 | ||||||
| (SGEMM) GFLOPS Performance | 13,5 GFLOPS | 9,05 GFLOPS | ||||||
| (Multi-core / watt performance) Performance / watt ratio | 128 pts / W | 291 pts / W | ||||||
| Amazon |  |
|
||||||
| eBay |  |
|
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
We can better compare what are the technical differences between the two processors.
Suggested PSU: We assume that we have an ATX computer case, a high end graphics card, 16GB RAM, a 512GB SSD, a 1TB HDD hard drive, a Blu-Ray drive. We will have to rely on a more powerful power supply if we want to have several graphics cards, several monitors, more memory, etc.
Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.
We see that the two processors have an equivalent number of cores, they have a similar turbo frequency, that the thermal dissipation power of Rockchip RK3328 is less. The Broadcom BCM2711 was designed earlier.
Performance comparison with the benchmarks:
Performance comparison between the two processors, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark software such as Geekbench.
| AnTuTu - Total Score | |
|---|---|
Broadcom BCM2711 | 400.275 |
| Rockchip RK3328 | 34.413 |
The difference is 1063%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
AnTuTu is one of the most popular apps in the world to evaluate and compare the power of a mobile device with the competition. It tests above all the power of calculation, the display of Web pages, the modeling of decorations in 3D, the management of the memory, the transfer of data.
| Android PassMark - CPU Mark | |
|---|---|
| Broadcom BCM2711 | 1.015 |
| Rockchip RK3328 | 480 |
The difference in performance is 111%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
PassMark is a benchmarking software that performs several performance tests including prime numbers, integers, floating point, compression, physics, extended instructions, encoding, sorting. The higher the score is, the higher is the device capacity.
With Android:
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-core & Single Core Score - Android | |
|---|---|
| Broadcom BCM2711 |
976 2.449 |
| Rockchip RK3328 |
563 1.454 |
In single core, the difference is 73%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 68%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
Geekbench 4 is a complete benchmark platform with several types of tests, including data compression, images, AES encryption, SQL encoding, HTML, PDF file rendering, matrix computation, Fast Fourier Transform, 3D object simulation, photo editing, memory testing. This allows us to better visualize the respective power of these devices. For each result, we took an average of 250 values on the famous benchmark software.
With Android:
| Geekbench 5 - Multi-core & Single Core Score - Android | |
|---|---|
| Broadcom BCM2711 |
234 672 |
| Rockchip RK3328 |
105 325 |
In single core, the difference is 123%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 107%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
Geekbench 5 is a software for measuring the performance of a computer system, for fixed devices, mobile devices, servers. This platform makes it possible to better compare the power of the CPU, the computing power and to compare it with similar or totally different systems. Geekbench 5 includes new workloads that represent work tasks and applications that we can find in reality.
Equivalence:
Broadcom BCM2711 Intel EquivalentBroadcom BCM2711 AMD EquivalentRockchip RK3328 Intel EquivalentRockchip RK3328 AMD EquivalentSee also:
Broadcom BCM2710A1Broadcom BCM2711B0Broadcom BCM2711C0Broadcom BCM2712Rockchip RK3326Rockchip RK3326SRockchip RK3328ARockchip RK3329
Disclaimer:
When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
This page includes affiliate links for which the administrator of GadgetVersus may earn a commission at no extra cost to you should you make a purchase. These links are indicated using the hashtag #ad.
Information:
We do not assume any responsibility for the data displayed on our website. Please use at your own risk. Some or all of this data may be out of date or incomplete, please refer to the technical page on the respective manufacturer's website to find the latest up-to-date information regarding the specifics of these products.