Apple M2 Ultra vs Intel Core i9-14900K


Apple M2 Ultra on Amazon USA
Intel Core i9-14900K on Amazon USA

Comparison of the technical characteristics between the processors, with the Apple M2 Ultra on one side and the Intel Core i9-14900K on the other side, also their respective performances with the benchmarks. The first is dedicated to the mini desktop sector, It has 24 cores, 24 threads, a maximum frequency of 3.7GHz. The second is used on the desktop segment, it has a total of 24 cores, 32 threads, its turbo frequency is set to 6.0 GHz. The following table also compares the lithography, the number of transistors (if indicated), the amount of cache memory, the maximum RAM memory capacity, the type of memory accepted, the release date, the maximum number of PCIe lanes, the values ​​obtained in Geekbench and Cinebench.






Specification comparison:


Processor Apple M2 Ultra Intel Core i9-14900K
Market (main)Mini desktop Desktop
ISAARMv8.5-A (64-bit) x86-64 (64 bit)
MicroarchitectureAvalanche, Blizzard Raptor Cove + Gracemont
Core nameAvalanche, Blizzard Raptor Lake Refresh-S
FamilyM series Core i9-14000
Part number(s), S-Spec

M2 Ultra

BX8071514900K,
CM8071505094017,
SRN48
Release dateQ2 2023 Q4 2023
Lithography5 nm FinFET N5P Intel 7
Transistors134,000,000,000 -
Cores24 24
Threads24 32
Base frequency2.42 GHz 3.2 GHz
Turbo frequency3.66 GHz 6.0 GHz
Energy cores

8x Apple Blizzard @ 2.42 GHz

16 Cores 16 Threads @ 2.4 / 4.4 GHz
High performance cores

16x Apple Avalanche @ 3.66 GHz

8 Cores 16 Threads @ 3.2 / 5.6 GHz
Cache memory72 MB 36 MB
Max memory capacity192 GB 192 GB
Memory types

LPDDR5-6400 (3200 MHz)

DDR5 5600 MT/s, DDR4 3200 MT/s
Max # of memory channels8 2
Max memory bandwidth819.2 GB/s 89.6 GB/s
Max PCIe lanes- 20
TDP60 W 125 W
Suggested PSU- 650W ATX Power Supply
GPU integrated graphicsApple M2 Ultra GPU 76-Core Intel UHD Graphics 770 (Raptor Lake)
GPU cores76 -
GPU execution units1,216 32
GPU shading units9,728 256
GPU base clock1,398 MHz 300 MHz
GPU boost clock1,398 MHz 1650 MHz
GPU FP32 floating point27,199 GFLOPS 844.8 GFLOPS
SocketSoC LGA1700
Compatible motherboard- Socket LGA 1700 Motherboard 
AI accelerator

AI accelerator 32-core

Gaussian & Neural Accelerator,
Deep Learning Boost
AI computing operations per seconds31.6 TOPS -
Crypto engine

-

AES New Instructions,
Secure Key
Security

-

OS Guard,
Execute Disable Bit,
Boot Guard,
Mode-based Execute Control,
Control-Flow Enforcement Technology
Max display resolution

8x 3840 x 2160@60Hz,
6x 6016 x 3384@60Hz
3x 7680 x 4320@60Hz

4096 x 2160@60Hz (HDMI),
7680 x 4320@60Hz (DP),
5120 x 3200@120Hz (eDP)
Video decodingH.264, HEVC 4K -
Video encodingH.264, HEVC -
Connectivity8 Thunderbolt 4, 3 USB-A 3.0, 2 HDMI 2.1 -
Cinebench R15 single thread248 346
Cinebench R15 multi-thread4,082 6,411
Cinebench R20 single thread486 922
Cinebench R20 multi-thread7,933 15,919
Cinebench R23 single thread1,728 2,355
Cinebench R23 multi-thread28,936 41,633
Cinebench 2024 single thread124 136
Cinebench 2024 multi-thread1,921 2,248
PassMark single thread4,137 4,791
PassMark CPU Mark48,513 61,040
(Mac OS X | Windows)
Geekbench 4 single core
7,325 11,339
(Mac OS X | Windows)
Geekbench 4 multi-core
76,086 105,804
(macOS | Windows)
Geekbench 5 single core
1,929 2,302
(macOS | Windows)
Geekbench 5 multi-core
27,374 26,919
(macOS | Windows)
Geekbench 6 single core
2,639 3,099
(macOS | Windows)
Geekbench 6 multi-core
20,932 22,473
(SGEMM)
GFLOPS Performance
788.1 GFLOPS 1,950 GFLOPS
(Multi-core / watt performance)
Performance / watt ratio
1,268 pts / W 846 pts / W
Amazon
eBay



We can better compare what are the technical differences between the two processors.

Suggested PSU: We assume that we have an ATX computer case, a high end graphics card, 16GB RAM, a 512GB SSD, a 1TB HDD hard drive, a Blu-Ray drive. We will have to rely on a more powerful power supply if we want to have several graphics cards, several monitors, more memory, etc.

Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.

We see that the two processors have an equivalent number of cores, the turbo frequency of Intel Core i9-14900K is bigger, that the PDT of Apple M2 Ultra is lower. Both were produced in the same year.

Performance comparison with the benchmarks:


Performance comparison between the two processors, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark software such as Geekbench.


Cinebench R15 - Multi-Thread & Single Thread Score
Intel Core i9-14900K 346
6,411
Apple M2 Ultra 248
4,082


In single core, the difference is 40%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 57%.


Cinebench R15 evaluates the performance of CPU calculations by restoring a photorealistic 3D scene. The scene has 2,000 objects, 300,000 polygons, uses sharp and fuzzy reflections, bright areas, shadows, procedural shaders, antialiasing, and so on. The faster the rendering of the scene is created, the more powerful the PC is, with a high number of points.


Cinebench R20 - Multi-Thread & Single Thread Score
Intel Core i9-14900K 922
15,919
Apple M2 Ultra 486
7,933


In single core, the difference is 90%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 101%.


Cinebench R20 is a multi-platform test software which allows to evaluate the hardware capacities of a device such as a computer, a tablet, a server. This version of Cinebench takes into account recent developments in processors with multiple cores and the latest improvements in rendering techniques. The evaluation is ultimately even more relevant.




Cinebench R23 - Multi-Thread & Single Thread Score
Intel Core i9-14900K 2,355
41,633
Apple M2 Ultra 1,728
28,936


In single core, the difference is 36%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 44%.


Cinebench R23 is cross-platform testing software that allows you to assess the hardware capabilities of a device such as a computer, tablet, server. This version of Cinebench takes into account recent developments in processors with multiple cores and the latest improvements in rendering techniques. The evaluation is ultimately even more relevant. The test scene contains no less than 2,000 objects and more than 300,000 polygons in total.


Cinebench 2024 - Multi-Thread & Single Thread Score
Intel Core i9-14900K 136
2,248
Apple M2 Ultra 124
1,921


In single core, the difference is 10%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 17%.


Cinebench 2024 is a benchmarking software that includes various tools for 3D modeling, animation, visual effects, motion graphics, composition and color grading capabilities. With for example a GPU-accelerated rendering engine, a 3D simulation tool, digital sculpture and painting, intelligent assets, models, shaders, and other materials, production tools.


PassMark - CPU Mark & single thread
Intel Core i9-14900K 4,791
61,040
Apple M2 Ultra 4,137
48,513


In single core, the difference is 16%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 26%.


PassMark is a benchmarking software that performs several performance tests including prime numbers, integers, floating point, compression, physics, extended instructions, encoding, sorting. The higher the score is, the higher is the device capacity.




With Mac OS X:

Geekbench 4 - Multi-core & Single Core Score - Mac OS X
Intel Core i9-14900K 10,211
97,040
Apple M2 Ultra 7,325
76,086


In single core, the difference is 39%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 28%.


Geekbench 4 is a complete benchmark platform with several types of tests, including data compression, images, AES encryption, SQL encoding, HTML, PDF file rendering, matrix computation, Fast Fourier Transform, 3D object simulation, photo editing, memory testing. This allows us to better visualize the respective power of these devices. For each result, we took an average of 250 values on the famous benchmark software.


With macOS:

Geekbench 5 - Multi-core & Single Core Score - macOS
Apple M2 Ultra 1,929
27,374
Intel Core i9-14900K 2,257
26,615


In single core, the difference is -15%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 3%.


Geekbench 5 is a software for measuring the performance of a computer system, for fixed devices, mobile devices, servers. This platform makes it possible to better compare the power of the CPU, the computing power and to compare it with similar or totally different systems. Geekbench 5 includes new workloads that represent work tasks and applications that we can find in reality.




With macOS:

Geekbench 6 - Multi-core & Single Core Score - macOS
Apple M2 Ultra 2,639
20,932
Intel Core i9-14900K 3,114
20,890


In single core, the difference is -15%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 0%.


Geekbench 6 is a benchmarking platform that is capable of evaluating the performance of a device across multiple operating systems. The software evaluates processor power, with its ability to support different tasks, such as file compression, browsing; GPU computing capabilities, with image editing, video editing, gaming skills, machine learning workloads.


Equivalence:

Intel Core i9-14900K AMD Equivalent

See also:

Intel Core i9-14900Intel Core i9-14900FIntel Core i9-14900HXIntel Core i9-14900KFIntel Core i9-14900KSIntel Core i9-14900T




GadgetVersus.com © 2024 - About us - XML sitemap - Privacy policy - Advertising policy - Contact

Disclaimer:

When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

This page includes affiliate links for which the administrator of GadgetVersus may earn a commission at no extra cost to you should you make a purchase. These links are indicated using the hashtag #ad.


Information:

We do not assume any responsibility for the data displayed on our website. Please use at your own risk. Some or all of this data may be out of date or incomplete, please refer to the technical page on the respective manufacturer's website to find the latest up-to-date information regarding the specifics of these products.


W3Ask W3Ask Brasil W3Ask Deutschland W3Ask España W3Ask France W3Ask Italia W3Ask Nederland