Apple A4 vs Nvidia Tegra X1 T210
Comparison of the technical characteristics between the processors, with the Apple A4 on one side and the Nvidia Tegra X1 T210 on the other side. The first is dedicated to the smartphone sector, It has 2 cores, 2 threads, a maximum frequency of 1.0GHz. The second is used on the console segment, it has a total of 8 cores, 8 threads, its turbo frequency is set to 1.9 GHz. The following table also compares the lithography, the number of transistors (if indicated), the amount of cache memory, the maximum RAM memory capacity, the type of memory accepted, the release date, the maximum number of PCIe lanes, the values obtained in Geekbench 4 and Cinebench R15.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
This page contains references to products from one or more of our advertisers. We may receive compensation when you click on links to those products. For an explanation of our advertising policy, please
visit this page.
Specifications:
Processor | |
Apple A4 |
| | |
Nvidia Tegra X1 T210 |
| |
Market | |
Smartphone |
| | |
Console |
| |
Family | |
A series |
| | |
Tegra |
| |
Part number(s), S-Spec | |
S5L8930X |
| | |
Tegra X1 T210, Erista |
| |
Release date | |
Q1 2010 |
| | |
Q2 2015 |
| |
Lithography | |
45 nm |
| | |
20 nm |
| |
Transistors | |
149,000,000 |
| | |
- |
| |
Cores | |
2 |
| | |
8 |
| |
Threads | |
2 |
| | |
8 |
| |
Base frequency | |
1.0 GHz |
| | |
1.3 GHz |
| |
Turbo frequency | |
- |
| | |
1.9 GHz |
| |
Energy cores | |
- |
| | |
4x ARM Cortex-A72 @ 1.5 GHz |
| |
High performance cores | |
2x ARM Cortex-A8 @ 1.0 GHz |
| | |
4x ARM Cortex-A57 @ 1.9 GHz |
| |
Cache memory | |
512 KB |
| | |
2.5 MB |
| |
Max memory capacity | |
512 MB |
| | |
8 GB |
| |
Memory types | |
DDR SDRAM |
| | |
LPDDR3, LPDDR4 |
| |
Max # of memory channels | |
2 |
| | |
2 |
| |
Max memory bandwidth | |
3.2 GB/s |
| | |
25.6 GB/s |
| |
TDP | |
5 W |
| | |
15 W |
| |
GPU integrated graphics | |
Imagination PowerVR SGX535 |
| | |
NVIDIA Tegra X1 Maxwell GPU |
| |
GPU execution units | |
2 |
| | |
1 |
| |
GPU shading units | |
8 |
| | |
256 |
| |
GPU base clock rate | |
- |
| | |
1,000 MHz |
| |
GPU max clock rate | |
200 MHz |
| | |
1,000 MHz |
| |
GPU FP32 floating point | |
1.6 GFLOPS |
| | |
512 GFLOPS |
| |
AnTuTu | |
5,100 |
| | |
224,500 |
| |
(iOS 64-bit | Android 64-bit) Geekbench 4 single core | |
211 |
| | |
1,158 |
| |
(iOS 64-bit | Android 64-bit) Geekbench 4 multi-core | |
211 |
| | |
3,276 |
| |
(SGEMM) GFLOPS performance | |
0.5 GFLOPS |
| | |
33.6 GFLOPS |
| |
(Multi-core / watt performance) Performance / watt ratio | |
42 pts / W |
| | |
218 pts / W |
| |
Amazon | |
 |
| | |
 |
| |
eBay | |
 |
| | |
 |
| |
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
We can better compare what are the technical differences between the two processors. The processor Nvidia Tegra X1 T210 has a larger number of cores, the turbo frequency of Nvidia Tegra X1 T210 is bigger, that the PDT of Apple A4 is lower. The Nvidia Tegra X1 T210 was started more recently.
Performances :
Performance comparison between the two processors, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark software such as Geekbench 4.
The difference is 4302%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
AnTuTu is one of the most popular apps in the world to evaluate and compare the power of a mobile device with the competition. It tests above all the power of calculation, the display of Web pages, the modeling of decorations in 3D, the management of the memory, the transfer of data.
In single core, the difference is 449%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 1453%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
Geekbench 4 is a complete benchmark platform with several types of tests, including data compression, images, AES encryption, SQL encoding, HTML, PDF file rendering, matrix computation, Fast Fourier Transform, 3D object simulation, photo editing, memory testing. This allows us to better visualize the respective power of these devices. For each result, we took an average of 250 values on the famous benchmark software.
Equivalence:
Apple A4 Intel equivalentApple A4 AMD equivalentNvidia Tegra X1 T210 Intel equivalentNvidia Tegra X1 T210 AMD equivalentSee also:
Apple A10 FusionApple A10X FusionApple A11 BionicApple A12 BionicApple A12X BionicApple A12Z BionicApple A13 BionicApple A13X BionicApple A14 BionicApple A14X BionicApple A5Apple A5XApple A6Apple A6XApple A7Apple A8Apple A8XApple A9Apple A9XSmartphones with the processor Apple A4:
Apple iPhone 4
Disclaimer:
When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
This page includes affiliate links for which the administrator of GadgetVersus may earn a commission at no extra cost to you should you make a purchase. These links are indicated using the hashtag #ad.
Information:
We do not assume any responsibility for the data displayed on our website. Please use at your own risk. Some or all of this data may be out of date or incomplete, please refer to the technical page on the respective manufacturer's website to find the latest up-to-date information regarding the specifics of these products.