FR
Amlogic S905X3 vs Amlogic S905X4
Comparison of the technical characteristics between the processors, with the Amlogic S905X3 on one side and the Amlogic S905X4 on the other side. The first is dedicated to the tv box sector, It has 4 cores, 4 threads, a maximum frequency of 1.9GHz. The second is used on the tv box segment, it has a total of 4 cores, 4 threads, its turbo frequency is set to 1.9 GHz. The following table also compares the lithography, the number of transistors (if indicated), the amount of cache memory, the maximum RAM memory capacity, the type of memory accepted, the release date, the maximum number of PCIe lanes, the values obtained in Geekbench and Cinebench.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
This page contains references to products from one or more of our advertisers. We may receive compensation when you click on links to those products. For an explanation of our advertising policy, please visit this page.
Specification comparison:
| Processor | Amlogic S905X3 | Amlogic S905X4 | ||||||
| Market (main) | TV Box | TV Box | ||||||
| ISA | ARMv8.2-A (64-bit) | ARMv8.2-A (64-bit) | ||||||
| Microarchitecture | Cortex-A55 | Cortex-A55 | ||||||
| Family | S9 Gen 3 | S9 Gen 4 | ||||||
| Part number(s), S-Spec | S905X3 |
S905X4 |
||||||
| Release date | Q4 2019 | Q1 2021 | ||||||
| Lithography | 12 nm | 12 nm | ||||||
| Cores | 4 | 4 | ||||||
| Threads | 4 | 4 | ||||||
| Base frequency | 1.9 GHz | 1.9 GHz | ||||||
| Turbo frequency | - | - | ||||||
| High performance cores | 4x ARM Cortex-A55 @ 1.91 GHz |
4x ARM Cortex-A55 @ 1.91 GHz |
||||||
| Cache memory | 1 MB | 1 MB | ||||||
| Max memory capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB | ||||||
| Memory types | LPDDR3, LPDDR4-1066 |
DDR3/3L/4, LPDDR3/4 1066 MHz |
||||||
| TDP | 5 W | 5 W | ||||||
| GPU integrated graphics | ARM Mali-G31 MP2 | ARM Mali-G31 MP2 | ||||||
| GPU execution units | 2 | 2 | ||||||
| GPU shading units | 32 | 32 | ||||||
| GPU clock | 850 MHz | 850 MHz | ||||||
| GPU FP32 floating point | 20.8 GFLOPS | 20.8 GFLOPS | ||||||
| Socket | SoC | SoC | ||||||
| Drystone MIPS | 21,600 DMIPS | 21,800 DMIPS | ||||||
| AI accelerator | NPU, Neural Network Accelerator INT8, PPU 12.8 GFLOPS FP16, 6.4 GFLOPS FP32, 512KB L2 |
- |
||||||
| AI computing operations per seconds | 1.2 TOPS | - | ||||||
| Crypto engine | AES 128/256-bit, DES, TDES, SM4, DVB-CSA, TRNG, CRC, SHA-1/SHA-2/HMAC SHA |
AES, TDES, SHA-1/SHA-2/HMAC, SM4, RSA |
||||||
| Security | TrustZone, Secure boot, Entropy true RNG, TVP, Secured IO & clock |
TrustZone, Secure boot |
||||||
| Max display resolution | 8K@24fps |
4K@120fps |
||||||
| Video decoding | H.265 8K@24fps, 4K@75fps, H.264 4K@30fps | H.265 4K@120fps, H.264 4K@75fps | ||||||
| Video encoding | H.265 1080p@60fps, H.264 1080p@30fps | H.265/H.264 1080p@60fps | ||||||
| Modem | 10/100/1000M Ethernet MAC, 10/100M Ethernet PHY |
10/100/1000 MAC, 10/100 PHY | ||||||
| Connectivity | USB 2.0, USB 3.0, HDMI 2.1 | USB 2.0, USB 3.0, HDMI2.1 | ||||||
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi/IEEE 802.11 a/b/g/n | 2.4GHz/5GHz, Wi-Fi 5 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac | ||||||
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 | ||||||
| Audio | DAS, I2S, TDM, SPDIF, PCM, PDM |
DAC, SPDIF, I2S, PDM |
||||||
| AnTuTu | 74,472 | 101,519 | ||||||
| (Android) PassMark CPU Mark | 414 | 576 | ||||||
| (Android) Geekbench 4 single core | 773 | 769 | ||||||
| (Android) Geekbench 4 multi-core | 2,128 | 2,154 | ||||||
| (Android) Geekbench 5 single core | 132 | 129 | ||||||
| (Android) Geekbench 5 multi-core | 458 | 424 | ||||||
| (SGEMM) GFLOPS performance | 5.33 GFLOPS | 5.4 GFLOPS | ||||||
| (Multi-core / watt performance) Performance / watt ratio | 426 pts / W | 431 pts / W | ||||||
| Amazon |  |
|
||||||
| eBay |  |
|
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
We can better compare what are the technical differences between the two processors.
Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.
We see that the two processors have an equivalent number of cores, they have a similar turbo frequency, that their respective TDP are of the same order. The Amlogic S905X4 was started more recently.
Performance comparison with the benchmarks:
Performance comparison between the two processors, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark software such as Geekbench.
| AnTuTu - Total score | |
|---|---|
Amlogic S905X4 |
101,519 |
| Amlogic S905X3 |
74,472 |
The difference is 36%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
AnTuTu is one of the most popular apps in the world to evaluate and compare the power of a mobile device with the competition. It tests above all the power of calculation, the display of Web pages, the modeling of decorations in 3D, the management of the memory, the transfer of data.
| Android PassMark - CPU Mark | |
|---|---|
| Amlogic S905X4 |
576 |
| Amlogic S905X3 |
414 |
The difference in performance is 39%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
PassMark is a benchmarking software that performs several performance tests including prime numbers, integers, floating point, compression, physics, extended instructions, encoding, sorting. The higher the score is, the higher is the device capacity.
On Android:
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-core & single core score - Android | |
|---|---|
| Amlogic S905X4 |
769 2,154 |
| Amlogic S905X3 |
773 2,128 |
In single core, the difference is 1%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 1%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
Geekbench 4 is a complete benchmark platform with several types of tests, including data compression, images, AES encryption, SQL encoding, HTML, PDF file rendering, matrix computation, Fast Fourier Transform, 3D object simulation, photo editing, memory testing. This allows us to better visualize the respective power of these devices. For each result, we took an average of 250 values on the famous benchmark software.
On Android:
| Geekbench 5 - Multi-core & single core score - Android | |
|---|---|
| Amlogic S905X3 |
132 458 |
| Amlogic S905X4 |
129 424 |
In single core, the difference is 2%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 8%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
Geekbench 5 is a software for measuring the performance of a computer system, for fixed devices, mobile devices, servers. This platform makes it possible to better compare the power of the CPU, the computing power and to compare it with similar or totally different systems. Geekbench 5 includes new workloads that represent work tasks and applications that we can find in reality.
Equivalence:
Amlogic S905X3 Intel equivalentAmlogic S905X3 AMD equivalentAmlogic S905X4 Intel equivalentAmlogic S905X4 AMD equivalentSee also:
Amlogic S905XAmlogic S905X-HAmlogic S905X2Amlogic S905X2-BAmlogic S905X3-BAmlogic S905X4-BAmlogic S905X4-KDisclaimer:
When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
This page includes affiliate links for which the administrator of GadgetVersus may earn a commission at no extra cost to you should you make a purchase. These links are indicated using the hashtag #ad.
Information:
We do not assume any responsibility for the data displayed on our website. Please use at your own risk. Some or all of this data may be out of date or incomplete, please refer to the technical page on the respective manufacturer's website to find the latest up-to-date information regarding the specifics of these products.