GadgetVersus Smartphone Processor


AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X vs Dual Intel Xeon Platinum 8173M


AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X on Amazon USA
Dual Intel Xeon Platinum 8173M on Amazon USA

Comparison of the technical characteristics between the processors, with the AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X on one side and the Dual Intel Xeon Platinum 8173M on the other side. The first is dedicated to the desktop sector, It has 12 cores, 24 threads, a maximum frequency of 4.3GHz. The second is used on the server segment, it has a total of 28 cores, 56 threads, its turbo frequency is set to 3.5 GHz. The following table also compares the lithography, the number of transistors (if indicated), the amount of cache memory, the maximum RAM memory capacity, the type of memory accepted, the date of first broadcast, the maximum number of PCIe lines, the values ​​obtained in Geekbench 4 and Cinebench R15.






Specifications:


Processor AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X Dual Intel Xeon Platinum 8173M
Market Desktop Server
Family Zen+ Skylake
Part number(s), S-Spec YD292XA8UC9AF SR37Q
Release date Q4 2018 Q3 2017
Lithography 12 nm 14 nm+
Transistors 9,600,000,000 -
Cores 12 56
Threads 24 112
Base frequency 3.5 GHz 2.0 GHz
Turbo frequency 4.3 GHz 3.5 GHz
Cache memory 32 MB 77.0 MB
Max memory capacity 1 TB 3 TB
Memory types DDR4-2933 DDR4-2666
Max # of memory channels 4 12
Max memory bandwidth 87.42 GB/s 238.42 GB/s
Max PCIe lanes 60 96
TDP 180 W 330 W
GPU integrated graphics None None
Socket TR4, LGA-4094 LGA3647
Cinebench R15 single thread 167 80
Cinebench R15 multi-thread 2,513 6,920
PassMark single thread 2,500 1,720
PassMark CPU Mark 25,260 43,590
(Linux 64-bit)
Geekbench 4 single core
5,081 3,680
(Linux 64-bit)
Geekbench 4 multi-core
42,703 74,400
(Linux)
Geekbench 5 single core
1,048 808
(Linux)
Geekbench 5 multi-core
9,745 19,082
(SGEMM)
GFLOPS performance
451 GFLOPS 1,750 GFLOPS
(Multi-core / watt performance)
Performance / watt ratio
237 pts / W 225 pts / W
Amazon
eBay




We can better compare what are the technical differences between the two processors. The processor Dual Intel Xeon Platinum 8173M has a larger number of cores, the maximum frequency of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X is greater, that the thermal dissipation power of Dual Intel Xeon Platinum 8173M is less. The AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X was designed earlier.

Performances :


Performance comparison between the two processors, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark software such as Geekbench 4.


Cinebench R15 - Multi-thread & single thread score
Dual Intel Xeon Platinum 8173M#ad 80
6,920
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X#ad 167
2,513


In single core, the difference is 109%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 175%.


Cinebench R15 evaluates the performance of CPU calculations by restoring a photorealistic 3D scene. The scene has 2,000 objects, 300,000 polygons, uses sharp and fuzzy reflections, bright areas, shadows, procedural shaders, antialiasing, and so on. The faster the rendering of the scene is created, the more powerful the PC is, with a high number of points.


PassMark - CPU Mark & single thread
Dual Intel Xeon Platinum 8173M#ad 1,720
43,590
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X#ad 2,500
25,260


In single core, the difference is 45%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 73%.


PassMark is a benchmarking software that performs several performance tests including prime numbers, integers, floating point, compression, physics, extended instructions, encoding, sorting. The higher the score is, the higher is the device capacity.


On Windows 64-bit:

Geekbench 4 - Multi-core & single core score - Windows 64-bit
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X#ad 4,672
34,183
Dual Intel Xeon Platinum 8173M#ad 4,038
25,336


In single core, the difference is 16%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 35%.

On Linux 64-bit:

Geekbench 4 - Multi-core & single core score - Linux 64-bit
Dual Intel Xeon Platinum 8173M#ad 3,680
74,400
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X#ad 5,081
42,703


In single core, the difference is 38%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 74%.


Geekbench 4 is a complete benchmark platform with several types of tests, including data compression, images, AES encryption, SQL encoding, HTML, PDF file rendering, matrix computation, Fast Fourier Transform, 3D object simulation, photo editing, memory testing. This allows us to better visualize the respective power of these devices. For each result, we took an average of 250 values on the famous benchmark software.


On Windows:

Geekbench 5 - Multi-core & single core score - Windows
Dual Intel Xeon Platinum 8173M#ad 871
20,827
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X#ad 1,074
10,303


In single core, the difference is 23%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 102%.

On Linux:

Geekbench 5 - Multi-core & single core score - Linux
Dual Intel Xeon Platinum 8173M#ad 808
19,082
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X#ad 1,048
9,745


In single core, the difference is 30%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 96%.


Geekbench 5 is a software for measuring the performance of a computer system, for fixed devices, mobile devices, servers. This platform makes it possible to better compare the power of the CPU, the computing power and to compare it with similar or totally different systems. Geekbench 5 includes new workloads that represent work tasks and applications that we can find in reality.


Equivalence:

AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X Intel equivalentDual Intel Xeon Platinum 8173M AMD equivalent

See also:

Intel Xeon Platinum 8173M








GadgetVersus.com © 2020 - Privacy policy - Advertising policy

Disclaimer:

When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

This page includes affiliate links for which the administrator of GadgetVersus may earn a commission at no extra cost to you should you make a purchase. These links are indicated using the hashtag #ad.


Information:

We do not assume any responsibility for the data displayed on our website. Please use at your own risk. Some or all of this data may be out of date or incomplete, please refer to the technical page on the respective manufacturer's website to find the latest up-to-date information regarding the specifics of these products.


Trading System Forex W3Ask W3Ask Brasil W3Ask Deutschland W3Ask España W3Ask France W3Ask Italia W3Ask Nederland