GadgetVersus Smartphone Processor


AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X vs Dual Intel Xeon E5-2699 v3


AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X on Amazon USA
Dual Intel Xeon E5-2699 v3 on Amazon USA

Comparison of the technical characteristics between the processors, with the AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X on one side and the Dual Intel Xeon E5-2699 v3 on the other side. The first is dedicated to the desktop sector, It has 12 cores, 24 threads, a maximum frequency of 4.3GHz. The second is used on the server segment, it has a total of 18 cores, 36 threads, its turbo frequency is set to 3.6 GHz. The following table also compares the lithography, the number of transistors (if indicated), the amount of cache memory, the maximum RAM memory capacity, the type of memory accepted, the date of first broadcast, the maximum number of PCIe lines, the values ​​obtained in Geekbench 4 and Cinebench R15.






Specifications:


Processor AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X Dual Intel Xeon E5-2699 v3
Market Desktop Server
Family Zen+ Haswell
Part number(s), S-Spec YD292XA8UC9AF CM8064401739300,
QGEP, QGN1, SR1XD
Release date Q4 2018 Q3 2014
Lithography 12 nm 32 nm
Transistors 9,600,000,000 14,400,000,000
Cores 12 36
Threads 24 72
Base frequency 3.5 GHz 2.3 GHz
Turbo frequency 4.3 GHz 3.6 GHz
Cache memory 32 MB 90 MB
Max memory capacity 1 TB 1,536 GB
Memory types DDR4-2933 DDR4 1600/1866/2133
Max # of memory channels 4 8
Max memory bandwidth 87.42 GB/s 136 GB/s
Max PCIe lanes 60 80
TDP 180 W 290 W
GPU integrated graphics None None
Socket TR4, LGA-4094 LGA2011
Cinebench R15 single thread 167 115
Cinebench R15 multi-thread 2,513 4,136
PassMark single thread 2,500 1,960
PassMark CPU Mark 25,260 29,400
(Linux 64-bit)
Geekbench 4 single core
5,081 3,409
(Linux 64-bit)
Geekbench 4 multi-core
42,703 58,288
(Linux)
Geekbench 5 single core
1,048 848
(Linux)
Geekbench 5 multi-core
9,745 16,288
(SGEMM)
GFLOPS performance
451 GFLOPS 1,254 GFLOPS
(Multi-core / watt performance)
Performance / watt ratio
237 pts / W 201 pts / W
Amazon
eBay




We can better compare what are the technical differences between the two processors. The processor Dual Intel Xeon E5-2699 v3 has a larger number of cores, the maximum frequency of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X is greater, that the thermal dissipation power of Dual Intel Xeon E5-2699 v3 is less. The AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X was designed earlier.

Performances :


Performance comparison between the two processors, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark software such as Geekbench 4.


Cinebench R15 - Multi-thread & single thread score
Dual Intel Xeon E5-2699 v3#ad 115
4,136
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X#ad 167
2,513


In single core, the difference is 45%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 65%.


Cinebench R15 evaluates the performance of CPU calculations by restoring a photorealistic 3D scene. The scene has 2,000 objects, 300,000 polygons, uses sharp and fuzzy reflections, bright areas, shadows, procedural shaders, antialiasing, and so on. The faster the rendering of the scene is created, the more powerful the PC is, with a high number of points.


PassMark - CPU Mark & single thread
Dual Intel Xeon E5-2699 v3#ad 1,960
29,400
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X#ad 2,500
25,260


In single core, the difference is 28%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 16%.


PassMark is a benchmarking software that performs several performance tests including prime numbers, integers, floating point, compression, physics, extended instructions, encoding, sorting. The higher the score is, the higher is the device capacity.


On Windows 64-bit:

Geekbench 4 - Multi-core & single core score - Windows 64-bit
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X#ad 4,672
34,183
Dual Intel Xeon E5-2699 v3#ad 2,963
25,913


In single core, the difference is 58%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 32%.

On Linux 64-bit:

Geekbench 4 - Multi-core & single core score - Linux 64-bit
Dual Intel Xeon E5-2699 v3#ad 3,409
58,288
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X#ad 5,081
42,703


In single core, the difference is 49%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 36%.


Geekbench 4 is a complete benchmark platform with several types of tests, including data compression, images, AES encryption, SQL encoding, HTML, PDF file rendering, matrix computation, Fast Fourier Transform, 3D object simulation, photo editing, memory testing. This allows us to better visualize the respective power of these devices. For each result, we took an average of 250 values on the famous benchmark software.


On Windows:

Geekbench 5 - Multi-core & single core score - Windows
Dual Intel Xeon E5-2699 v3#ad 780
13,048
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X#ad 1,074
10,303


In single core, the difference is 38%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 27%.

On Linux:

Geekbench 5 - Multi-core & single core score - Linux
Dual Intel Xeon E5-2699 v3#ad 848
16,288
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X#ad 1,048
9,745


In single core, the difference is 24%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 67%.

On macOS:

Geekbench 5 - Multi-core & single core score - macOS
Dual Intel Xeon E5-2699 v3#ad 866
13,472
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X#ad 1,090
10,509


In single core, the difference is 26%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 28%.


Geekbench 5 is a software for measuring the performance of a computer system, for fixed devices, mobile devices, servers. This platform makes it possible to better compare the power of the CPU, the computing power and to compare it with similar or totally different systems. Geekbench 5 includes new workloads that represent work tasks and applications that we can find in reality.


Equivalence:

AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X Intel equivalentDual Intel Xeon E5-2699 v3 AMD equivalent

See also:

Dual Intel Xeon E5-2699 v4Intel Xeon E5-2699 v3Intel Xeon E5-2699 v4








GadgetVersus.com © 2020 - Privacy policy - Advertising policy

Disclaimer:

When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

This page includes affiliate links for which the administrator of GadgetVersus may earn a commission at no extra cost to you should you make a purchase. These links are indicated using the hashtag #ad.


Information:

We do not assume any responsibility for the data displayed on our website. Please use at your own risk. Some or all of this data may be out of date or incomplete, please refer to the technical page on the respective manufacturer's website to find the latest up-to-date information regarding the specifics of these products.


Trading System Forex W3Ask W3Ask Brasil W3Ask Deutschland W3Ask España W3Ask France W3Ask Italia W3Ask Nederland