GadgetVersus Smartphone Processor


AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X vs Dual Intel Xeon E5-2650


AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X on Amazon USA
Dual Intel Xeon E5-2650 on Amazon USA

Comparison of the technical characteristics between the processors, with the AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X on one side and the Dual Intel Xeon E5-2650 on the other side. The first is dedicated to the desktop sector, It has 12 cores, 24 threads, a maximum frequency of 4.3GHz. The second is used on the server segment, it has a total of 8 cores, 16 threads, its turbo frequency is set to 2.8 GHz. The following table also compares the lithography, the number of transistors (if indicated), the amount of cache memory, the maximum RAM memory capacity, the type of memory accepted, the date of first broadcast, the maximum number of PCIe lines, the values ​​obtained in Geekbench 4 and Cinebench R15.






Specifications:


Processor AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X Dual Intel Xeon E5-2650
Market Desktop Server
Family Zen+ Sandy Bridge EP
Part number(s), S-Spec YD292XA8UC9AF BX80621E52650,
CM8062100856218,
QARE, QB7V, QBER,
QBUT, SR0H4, SR0KQ
Release date Q4 2018 Q1 2012
Lithography 12 nm 32 nm
Transistors 9,600,000,000 4,540,000,000
Cores 12 16
Threads 24 32
Base frequency 3.5 GHz 2.0 GHz
Turbo frequency 4.3 GHz 2.8 GHz
Cache memory 32 MB 40 MB
Max memory capacity 1 TB 768 GB
Memory types DDR4-2933 DDR3 800/1066/1333/1600
Max # of memory channels 4 8
Max memory bandwidth 87.42 GB/s 102.4 GB/s
Max PCIe lanes 60 80
TDP 180 W 190 W
GPU integrated graphics None None
Socket TR4, LGA-4094 LGA2011
Cinebench R15 single thread 167 91
Cinebench R15 multi-thread 2,513 1,549
PassMark single thread 2,500 1,200
PassMark CPU Mark 25,260 12,750
(Linux 64-bit)
Geekbench 4 single core
5,081 2,375
(Linux 64-bit)
Geekbench 4 multi-core
42,703 26,356
(SGEMM)
GFLOPS performance
451 GFLOPS 194.7 GFLOPS
(Multi-core / watt performance)
Performance / watt ratio
237 pts / W 139 pts / W
Amazon
eBay




We can better compare what are the technical differences between the two processors. The processor AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X has more cores, the maximum frequency of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X is greater, that the thermal dissipation power of Dual Intel Xeon E5-2650 is less. The AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X was designed earlier.

Performances :


Performance comparison between the two processors, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark software such as Geekbench 4.


Cinebench R15 - Multi-thread & single thread score
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X#ad 167
2,513
Dual Intel Xeon E5-2650#ad 91
1,549


In single core, the difference is 84%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 62%.


Cinebench R15 evaluates the performance of CPU calculations by restoring a photorealistic 3D scene. The scene has 2,000 objects, 300,000 polygons, uses sharp and fuzzy reflections, bright areas, shadows, procedural shaders, antialiasing, and so on. The faster the rendering of the scene is created, the more powerful the PC is, with a high number of points.


PassMark - CPU Mark & single thread
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X#ad 2,500
25,260
Dual Intel Xeon E5-2650#ad 1,200
12,750


In single core, the difference is 108%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 98%.


PassMark is a benchmarking software that performs several performance tests including prime numbers, integers, floating point, compression, physics, extended instructions, encoding, sorting. The higher the score is, the higher is the device capacity.


On Windows 64-bit:

Geekbench 4 - Multi-core & single core score - Windows 64-bit
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X#ad 4,672
34,183
Dual Intel Xeon E5-2650#ad 2,309
19,926


In single core, the difference is 102%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 72%.

On Linux 64-bit:

Geekbench 4 - Multi-core & single core score - Linux 64-bit
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X#ad 5,081
42,703
Dual Intel Xeon E5-2650#ad 2,375
26,356


In single core, the difference is 114%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 62%.

On Mac OS X 64-bit:

Geekbench 4 - Multi-core & single core score - Mac OS X 64-bit
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X#ad 4,787
33,327
Dual Intel Xeon E5-2650#ad 1,471
23,191


In single core, the difference is 225%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 44%.


Geekbench 4 is a complete benchmark platform with several types of tests, including data compression, images, AES encryption, SQL encoding, HTML, PDF file rendering, matrix computation, Fast Fourier Transform, 3D object simulation, photo editing, memory testing. This allows us to better visualize the respective power of these devices. For each result, we took an average of 250 values on the famous benchmark software.


Equivalence:

AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X Intel equivalentDual Intel Xeon E5-2650 AMD equivalent

See also:

Dual Intel Xeon E5-2650 v2Intel Xeon E5-2650Intel Xeon E5-2650 v2








GadgetVersus.com © 2020 - Privacy policy - Advertising policy

Disclaimer:

When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

This page includes affiliate links for which the administrator of GadgetVersus may earn a commission at no extra cost to you should you make a purchase. These links are indicated using the hashtag #ad.


Information:

We do not assume any responsibility for the data displayed on our website. Please use at your own risk. Some or all of this data may be out of date or incomplete, please refer to the technical page on the respective manufacturer's website to find the latest up-to-date information regarding the specifics of these products.


Trading System Forex W3Ask W3Ask Brasil W3Ask Deutschland W3Ask España W3Ask France W3Ask Italia W3Ask Nederland