AMD Ryzen 9 5980HS vs Intel Core i7-7820X


AMD Ryzen 9 5980HS on Amazon USA
Intel Core i7-7820X on Amazon USA

Comparison of the technical characteristics between the processors, with the AMD Ryzen 9 5980HS on one side and the Intel Core i7-7820X on the other side. The first is dedicated to the big gaming laptop sector, It has 8 cores, 16 threads, a maximum frequency of 4.8GHz. The second is used on the desktop segment, it has a total of 8 cores, 16 threads, its turbo frequency is set to 4.3 GHz. The following table also compares the lithography, the number of transistors (if indicated), the amount of cache memory, the maximum RAM memory capacity, the type of memory accepted, the release date, the maximum number of PCIe lanes, the values ​​obtained in Geekbench 4 and Cinebench R15.






Specifications:


Processor AMD Ryzen 9 5980HS Intel Core i7-7820X
Market (main) Big gaming laptop Desktop
ISA x86-64 (64 bit) x86-64 (64 bit)
Microarchitecture Zen 3 Skylake
Core name Cezanne Skylake-X
Family Ryzen 9 5000 Core i7-7000
Part number(s), S-Spec 100-000000474 BX80673I77820X,
BXC80673I77820X,
CD8067303611000,
SR3L5
Release date Q1 2021 Q2 2017
Lithography 7nm FinFET 14 nm+
Transistors 10,700,000,000 3,600,000,000
Cores 8 8
Threads 16 16
Base frequency 3.0 GHz 3.6 GHz
Turbo frequency 4.8 GHz 4.3 GHz
Cache memory 16 MB 11 MB
Max memory capacity 48 GB 128 GB
Memory types DDR4-3200, LPDDR4-4266 DDR4-2666
Max # of memory channels 4 4
Max memory bandwidth 68.3 GB/s 85 GB/s
Max PCIe lanes 16 28
TDP 35 W 140 W
Suggested PSU - 650W ATX Power Supply
GPU integrated graphics AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 None
GPU shading units 512 -
GPU base clock 1,100 MHz -
GPU boost clock 2100 MHz -
Socket FP6 LGA2066
Compatible motherboard - Socket LGA 2066 Motherboard 
Maximum temperature 105°C 99°C
Cinebench R15 single thread 222 193
Cinebench R15 multi-thread 2,071 1,734
Cinebench R23 single thread 1,520 1,162
Cinebench R23 multi-thread 12,618 11,653
PassMark single thread 3,354 2,470
PassMark CPU Mark 23,067 17,780
(Windows 64-bit)
Geekbench 4 single core
6,146 5,328
(Windows 64-bit)
Geekbench 4 multi-core
32,543 30,833
(SGEMM)
GFLOPS performance
466.5 GFLOPS 913.5 GFLOPS
(Multi-core / watt performance)
Performance / watt ratio
930 pts / W 220 pts / W
Amazon
eBay



We can better compare what are the technical differences between the two processors.

Suggested PSU: We assume that we have An ATX computer case, a high end graphics card, 16GB RAM, a 512GB SSD, a 1TB HDD hard drive, a Blu-Ray drive. We will have to rely on a more powerful power supply if we want to have several graphics cards, several monitors, more memory, etc.

Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.

We see that the two processors have an equivalent number of cores, the maximum frequency of AMD Ryzen 9 5980HS is greater, that the PDT of AMD Ryzen 9 5980HS is lower. The AMD Ryzen 9 5980HS was designed earlier.

Performances :


Performance comparison between the two processors, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark software such as Geekbench 4.


Cinebench R15 - Multi-thread & single thread score
AMD Ryzen 9 5980HS 222
2,071
Intel Core i7-7820X 193
1,734


In single core, the difference is 15%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 19%.


Cinebench R15 evaluates the performance of CPU calculations by restoring a photorealistic 3D scene. The scene has 2,000 objects, 300,000 polygons, uses sharp and fuzzy reflections, bright areas, shadows, procedural shaders, antialiasing, and so on. The faster the rendering of the scene is created, the more powerful the PC is, with a high number of points.


Cinebench R23 - Multi-thread & single thread score
AMD Ryzen 9 5980HS 1,520
12,618
Intel Core i7-7820X 1,162
11,653


In single core, the difference is 31%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 8%.


Cinebench R23 is cross-platform testing software that allows you to assess the hardware capabilities of a device such as a computer, tablet, server. This version of Cinebench takes into account recent developments in processors with multiple cores and the latest improvements in rendering techniques. The evaluation is ultimately even more relevant. The test scene contains no less than 2,000 objects and more than 300,000 polygons in total.


PassMark - CPU Mark & single thread
AMD Ryzen 9 5980HS 3,354
23,067
Intel Core i7-7820X 2,470
17,780


In single core, the difference is 36%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 30%.


PassMark is a benchmarking software that performs several performance tests including prime numbers, integers, floating point, compression, physics, extended instructions, encoding, sorting. The higher the score is, the higher is the device capacity.





On Windows 64-bit:

Geekbench 4 - Multi-core & single core score - Windows 64-bit
AMD Ryzen 9 5980HS 6,146
32,543
Intel Core i7-7820X 5,328
30,833


In single core, the difference is 15%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 6%.


Geekbench 4 is a complete benchmark platform with several types of tests, including data compression, images, AES encryption, SQL encoding, HTML, PDF file rendering, matrix computation, Fast Fourier Transform, 3D object simulation, photo editing, memory testing. This allows us to better visualize the respective power of these devices. For each result, we took an average of 250 values on the famous benchmark software.


Equivalence:

AMD Ryzen 9 5980HS Intel equivalentIntel Core i7-7820X AMD equivalent

See also:

AMD Ryzen 9 5980HX

Intel Core i7-7820HQ




GadgetVersus.com © 2021 - Information - XML sitemap - Privacy policy - Advertising policy - Contact

Disclaimer:

When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

This page includes affiliate links for which the administrator of GadgetVersus may earn a commission at no extra cost to you should you make a purchase. These links are indicated using the hashtag #ad.


Information:

We do not assume any responsibility for the data displayed on our website. Please use at your own risk. Some or all of this data may be out of date or incomplete, please refer to the technical page on the respective manufacturer's website to find the latest up-to-date information regarding the specifics of these products.


Trading System Forex W3Ask W3Ask Brasil W3Ask Deutschland W3Ask España W3Ask France W3Ask Italia W3Ask Nederland