AMD Ryzen 9 5950X vs AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
Comparison of the technical characteristics between the processors, with the AMD Ryzen 9 5950X on one side and the AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X on the other side. The first is dedicated to the desktop sector, It has 16 cores, 32 threads, a maximum frequency of 4.9GHz. The second is used on the desktop segment, it has a total of 24 cores, 48 threads, its turbo frequency is set to 4.5 GHz. The following table also compares the lithography, the number of transistors (if indicated), the amount of cache memory, the maximum RAM memory capacity, the type of memory accepted, the release date, the maximum number of PCIe lanes, the values obtained in Geekbench 4 and Cinebench R15.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
This page contains references to products from one or more of our advertisers. We may receive compensation when you click on links to those products. For an explanation of our advertising policy, please
visit this page.
Specifications:
Processor | |
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X |
| | |
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X |
| |
Market | |
Desktop |
| | |
Desktop |
| |
Family | |
Zen 3 |
| | |
Zen 2 |
| |
Part number(s), S-Spec | |
100-000000059,
100-100000059WOF |
| | |
100000010WOF |
| |
Release date | |
Q4 2020 |
| | |
Q4 2019 |
| |
Lithography | |
7 nm FinFET |
| | |
7 nm FinFET |
| |
Transistors | |
- |
| | |
23,540,000,000 |
| |
Cores | |
16 |
| | |
24 |
| |
Threads | |
32 |
| | |
48 |
| |
Base frequency | |
3.4 GHz |
| | |
3.8 GHz |
| |
Turbo frequency | |
4.9 GHz |
| | |
4.5 GHz |
| |
Cache memory | |
64 MB |
| | |
128 MB |
| |
Max memory capacity | |
128 GB |
| | |
512 GB |
| |
Memory types | |
DDR4-3200 |
| | |
DDR4-3200 |
| |
Max # of memory channels | |
2 |
| | |
4 |
| |
Max memory bandwidth | |
47.68 GB/s |
| | |
95.37 GB/s |
| |
Max PCIe lanes | |
20 |
| | |
64 |
| |
TDP | |
105 W |
| | |
280 W |
| |
GPU integrated graphics | |
None |
| | |
None |
| |
Socket | |
AM4 |
| | |
sTRX4 |
| |
Maximum temperature | |
90°C |
| | |
95°C |
| |
CPU-Z single thread | |
668 |
| | |
523 |
| |
CPU-Z multi thread | |
12,331 |
| | |
16,553 |
| |
Cinebench R15 single thread | |
275 |
| | |
210 |
| |
Cinebench R15 multi-thread | |
4,364 |
| | |
5,950 |
| |
Cinebench R20 single thread | |
631 |
| | |
520 |
| |
Cinebench R20 multi-thread | |
9,986 |
| | |
13,570 |
| |
PassMark single thread | |
3,549 |
| | |
2,680 |
| |
PassMark CPU Mark | |
46,647 |
| | |
56,040 |
| |
(Windows 64-bit) Geekbench 4 single core | |
7,196 |
| | |
5,420 |
| |
(Windows 64-bit) Geekbench 4 multi-core | |
62,456 |
| | |
57,891 |
| |
(Windows) Geekbench 5 single core | |
1,674 |
| | |
1,245 |
| |
(Windows) Geekbench 5 multi-core | |
16,409 |
| | |
17,567 |
| |
(SGEMM) GFLOPS performance | |
967.3 GFLOPS |
| | |
1,898 GFLOPS |
| |
(Multi-core / watt performance) Performance / watt ratio | |
595 pts / W |
| | |
207 pts / W |
| |
Amazon | |
 |
| | |
 |
| |
eBay | |
 |
| | |
 |
| |
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
We can better compare what are the technical differences between the two processors. The processor AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X has a larger number of cores, the maximum frequency of AMD Ryzen 9 5950X is greater, that the PDT of AMD Ryzen 9 5950X is lower. The AMD Ryzen 9 5950X was designed earlier.
Performances :
Performance comparison between the two processors, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark software such as Geekbench 4.
In single core, the difference is 28%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 34%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
CPU-Z is a system information software that provides the name of the processor, its model number, the codename, the cache levels, the package, the process. It can also gives data about the mainboard, the memory. It makes real time measurement, with finally a benchmark for the single thread, as well as for the multi thread.
In single core, the difference is 31%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 36%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
Cinebench R15 evaluates the performance of CPU calculations by restoring a photorealistic 3D scene. The scene has 2,000 objects, 300,000 polygons, uses sharp and fuzzy reflections, bright areas, shadows, procedural shaders, antialiasing, and so on. The faster the rendering of the scene is created, the more powerful the PC is, with a high number of points.
In single core, the difference is 21%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 36%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
Cinebench R20 is a multi-platform test software which allows to evaluate the hardware capacities of a device such as a computer, a tablet, a server. This version of Cinebench takes into account recent developments in processors with multiple cores and the latest improvements in rendering techniques. The evaluation is ultimately even more relevant.
In single core, the difference is 32%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 20%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
PassMark is a benchmarking software that performs several performance tests including prime numbers, integers, floating point, compression, physics, extended instructions, encoding, sorting. The higher the score is, the higher is the device capacity.
On Windows 64-bit:
In single core, the difference is 33%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 8%.
On Linux 64-bit:
In single core, the difference is 25%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 26%.
On Mac OS X 64-bit:
In single core, the difference is 30%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 19%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
Geekbench 4 is a complete benchmark platform with several types of tests, including data compression, images, AES encryption, SQL encoding, HTML, PDF file rendering, matrix computation, Fast Fourier Transform, 3D object simulation, photo editing, memory testing. This allows us to better visualize the respective power of these devices. For each result, we took an average of 250 values on the famous benchmark software.
On Windows:
In single core, the difference is 34%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 7%.
On Linux:
In single core, the difference is 26%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 40%.
On macOS:
In single core, the difference is 35%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 24%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
Geekbench 5 is a software for measuring the performance of a computer system, for fixed devices, mobile devices, servers. This platform makes it possible to better compare the power of the CPU, the computing power and to compare it with similar or totally different systems. Geekbench 5 includes new workloads that represent work tasks and applications that we can find in reality.
Equivalence:
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X Intel equivalentAMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X Intel equivalent