AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX vs Quad Intel Xeon Gold 6148


AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX on Amazon USA
Quad Intel Xeon Gold 6148 on Amazon USA

Comparison of the technical characteristics between the processors, with the AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX on one side and the Quad Intel Xeon Gold 6148 on the other side. The first is dedicated to the big gaming laptop sector, It has 8 cores, 16 threads, a maximum frequency of 4.6GHz. The second is used on the server segment, it has a total of 20 cores, 40 threads, its turbo frequency is set to 3.7 GHz. The following table also compares the lithography, the number of transistors (if indicated), the amount of cache memory, the maximum RAM memory capacity, the type of memory accepted, the release date, the maximum number of PCIe lanes, the values ​​obtained in Geekbench 4 and Cinebench R15.






Specifications:


Processor AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX Quad Intel Xeon Gold 6148
Market (main) Big gaming laptop Server
ISA x86-64 (64 bit) x86-64 (64 bit)
Microarchitecture Zen 3 Skylake
Core name Cezanne Skylake-SP
Family Ryzen 9 5000 Xeon Gold 6100
Part number(s), S-Spec 100-000000300 BX806736148,
CD8067303406200,
QMS1, SR3B6
Release date Q1 2021 Q3 2017
Lithography 7nm FinFET 14 nm
Transistors 10,700,000,000 -
Cores 8 80
Threads 16 160
Base frequency 3.3 GHz 2.4 GHz
Turbo frequency 4.6 GHz 3.7 GHz
Cache memory 16 MB 110.0 MB
Max memory capacity 48 GB 3,072 GB
Memory types DDR4-3200, LPDDR4-4266 DDR4-2666
Max # of memory channels 4 24
Max memory bandwidth 68.3 GB/s 476.84 GB/s
Max PCIe lanes 16 192
TDP 45 W 600 W
Suggested PSU - 1200W ATX Power Supply
GPU integrated graphics AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 None
GPU shading units 512 -
GPU base clock 1,100 MHz -
GPU boost clock 2100 MHz -
Socket FP6 LGA3647
Compatible motherboard - Socket LGA 3647 Motherboard 
Maximum temperature 105°C 95°C
Cinebench R15 single thread 239 161
Cinebench R15 multi-thread 2,197 9,685
(Linux 64-bit)
Geekbench 4 single core
6,344 4,090
(Linux 64-bit)
Geekbench 4 multi-core
32,137 120,717
(Linux)
Geekbench 5 single core
1,394 1,036
(Linux)
Geekbench 5 multi-core
8,191 30,224
(SGEMM)
GFLOPS performance
463.7 GFLOPS 3,886 GFLOPS
(Multi-core / watt performance)
Performance / watt ratio
714 pts / W 201 pts / W
Amazon
eBay



We can better compare what are the technical differences between the two processors.

Suggested PSU: We assume that we have An ATX computer case, a high end graphics card, 16GB RAM, a 512GB SSD, a 1TB HDD hard drive, a Blu-Ray drive. We will have to rely on a more powerful power supply if we want to have several graphics cards, several monitors, more memory, etc.

Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.

The processor Quad Intel Xeon Gold 6148 has a larger number of cores, the maximum frequency of AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX is greater, that the PDT of AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX is lower. The AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX was designed earlier.

Performances :


Performance comparison between the two processors, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark software such as Geekbench 4.


Cinebench R15 - Multi-thread & single thread score
Quad Intel Xeon Gold 6148 161
9,685
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX 239
2,197


In single core, the difference is 48%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 341%.


Cinebench R15 evaluates the performance of CPU calculations by restoring a photorealistic 3D scene. The scene has 2,000 objects, 300,000 polygons, uses sharp and fuzzy reflections, bright areas, shadows, procedural shaders, antialiasing, and so on. The faster the rendering of the scene is created, the more powerful the PC is, with a high number of points.





On Windows 64-bit:

Geekbench 4 - Multi-core & single core score - Windows 64-bit
Quad Intel Xeon Gold 6148 4,155
34,747
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX 6,195
32,633


In single core, the difference is 49%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 6%.

On Linux 64-bit:

Geekbench 4 - Multi-core & single core score - Linux 64-bit
Quad Intel Xeon Gold 6148 4,090
120,717
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX 6,344
32,137


In single core, the difference is 55%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 276%.


Geekbench 4 is a complete benchmark platform with several types of tests, including data compression, images, AES encryption, SQL encoding, HTML, PDF file rendering, matrix computation, Fast Fourier Transform, 3D object simulation, photo editing, memory testing. This allows us to better visualize the respective power of these devices. For each result, we took an average of 250 values on the famous benchmark software.


On Linux:

Geekbench 5 - Multi-core & single core score - Linux
Quad Intel Xeon Gold 6148 1,036
30,224
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX 1,394
8,191


In single core, the difference is 35%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 269%.


Geekbench 5 is a software for measuring the performance of a computer system, for fixed devices, mobile devices, servers. This platform makes it possible to better compare the power of the CPU, the computing power and to compare it with similar or totally different systems. Geekbench 5 includes new workloads that represent work tasks and applications that we can find in reality.


Equivalence:

AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX Intel equivalentQuad Intel Xeon Gold 6148 AMD equivalent

See also:

AMD Ryzen 9 5900HAMD Ryzen 9 5900HS

Dual Intel Xeon Gold 6148Intel Xeon Gold 6148




GadgetVersus.com © 2021 - Information - XML sitemap - Privacy policy - Advertising policy - Contact

Disclaimer:

When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

This page includes affiliate links for which the administrator of GadgetVersus may earn a commission at no extra cost to you should you make a purchase. These links are indicated using the hashtag #ad.


Information:

We do not assume any responsibility for the data displayed on our website. Please use at your own risk. Some or all of this data may be out of date or incomplete, please refer to the technical page on the respective manufacturer's website to find the latest up-to-date information regarding the specifics of these products.


Trading System Forex W3Ask W3Ask Brasil W3Ask Deutschland W3Ask España W3Ask France W3Ask Italia W3Ask Nederland