AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX vs Dual Intel Xeon Silver 4210


AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX on Amazon USA
Dual Intel Xeon Silver 4210 on Amazon USA

Comparison of the technical characteristics between the processors, with the AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX on one side and the Dual Intel Xeon Silver 4210 on the other side. The first is dedicated to the big gaming laptop sector, It has 8 cores, 16 threads, a maximum frequency of 4.6GHz. The second is used on the server segment, it has a total of 10 cores, 20 threads, its turbo frequency is set to 3.2 GHz. The following table also compares the lithography, the number of transistors (if indicated), the amount of cache memory, the maximum RAM memory capacity, the type of memory accepted, the release date, the maximum number of PCIe lanes, the values ​​obtained in Geekbench 4 and Cinebench R15.






Specifications:


Processor AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX Dual Intel Xeon Silver 4210
Market (main) Big gaming laptop Server
ISA x86-64 (64 bit) x86-64 (64 bit)
Microarchitecture Zen 3 Cascade Lake
Core name Cezanne Cascade Lake-SP
Family Ryzen 9 5000 Xeon Silver 4200
Part number(s), S-Spec 100-000000300 BX806954210,
CD8069503956302,
QPJF, SRFBL
Release date Q1 2021 Q2 2019
Lithography 7nm FinFET 14 nm
Transistors 10,700,000,000 -
Cores 8 20
Threads 16 40
Base frequency 3.3 GHz 2.2 GHz
Turbo frequency 4.6 GHz 3.2 GHz
Cache memory 16 MB 27.50 MB
Max memory capacity 48 GB 2 TB
Memory types DDR4-3200, LPDDR4-4266 DDR4-2400
Max # of memory channels 4 12
Max memory bandwidth 68.3 GB/s 214.6 GB/s
Max PCIe lanes 16 96
TDP 45 W 170 W
Suggested PSU - 700W ATX Power Supply
GPU integrated graphics AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 None
GPU shading units 512 -
GPU base clock 1,100 MHz -
GPU boost clock 2100 MHz -
Socket FP6 LGA3647
Compatible motherboard - Socket LGA 3647 Motherboard 
Maximum temperature 105°C 78°C
CPU-Z single thread 626 302
CPU-Z multi thread 6,276 5,657
Cinebench R15 single thread 239 178
Cinebench R15 multi-thread 2,197 2,805
Cinebench R20 single thread 559 417
Cinebench R20 multi-thread 5,056 6,730
PassMark single thread 3,297 1,820
PassMark CPU Mark 23,991 21,770
(Linux 64-bit)
Geekbench 4 single core
6,344 3,289
(Linux 64-bit)
Geekbench 4 multi-core
32,137 38,704
(Linux)
Geekbench 5 single core
1,394 824
(Linux)
Geekbench 5 multi-core
8,191 12,641
(SGEMM)
GFLOPS performance
463.7 GFLOPS 970 GFLOPS
(Multi-core / watt performance)
Performance / watt ratio
714 pts / W 228 pts / W
Amazon
eBay



We can better compare what are the technical differences between the two processors.

Suggested PSU: We assume that we have An ATX computer case, a high end graphics card, 16GB RAM, a 512GB SSD, a 1TB HDD hard drive, a Blu-Ray drive. We will have to rely on a more powerful power supply if we want to have several graphics cards, several monitors, more memory, etc.

Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.

The processor Dual Intel Xeon Silver 4210 has a larger number of cores, the maximum frequency of AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX is greater, that the PDT of AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX is lower. The AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX was designed earlier.

Performances :


Performance comparison between the two processors, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark software such as Geekbench 4.


CPU-Z - Multi-thread & single thread score
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX 626
6,276
Dual Intel Xeon Silver 4210 302
5,657


In single core, the difference is 107%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 11%.


CPU-Z is a system information software that provides the name of the processor, its model number, the codename, the cache levels, the package, the process. It can also gives data about the mainboard, the memory. It makes real time measurement, with finally a benchmark for the single thread, as well as for the multi thread.


Cinebench R15 - Multi-thread & single thread score
Dual Intel Xeon Silver 4210 178
2,805
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX 239
2,197


In single core, the difference is 34%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 28%.


Cinebench R15 evaluates the performance of CPU calculations by restoring a photorealistic 3D scene. The scene has 2,000 objects, 300,000 polygons, uses sharp and fuzzy reflections, bright areas, shadows, procedural shaders, antialiasing, and so on. The faster the rendering of the scene is created, the more powerful the PC is, with a high number of points.


Cinebench R20 - Multi-thread & single thread score
Dual Intel Xeon Silver 4210 417
6,730
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX 559
5,056


In single core, the difference is 34%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 33%.


Cinebench R20 is a multi-platform test software which allows to evaluate the hardware capacities of a device such as a computer, a tablet, a server. This version of Cinebench takes into account recent developments in processors with multiple cores and the latest improvements in rendering techniques. The evaluation is ultimately even more relevant.


PassMark - CPU Mark & single thread
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX 3,297
23,991
Dual Intel Xeon Silver 4210 1,820
21,770


In single core, the difference is 81%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 10%.


PassMark is a benchmarking software that performs several performance tests including prime numbers, integers, floating point, compression, physics, extended instructions, encoding, sorting. The higher the score is, the higher is the device capacity.





On Windows 64-bit:

Geekbench 4 - Multi-core & single core score - Windows 64-bit
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX 6,195
32,633
Dual Intel Xeon Silver 4210 3,249
25,422


In single core, the difference is 91%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 28%.

On Linux 64-bit:

Geekbench 4 - Multi-core & single core score - Linux 64-bit
Dual Intel Xeon Silver 4210 3,289
38,704
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX 6,344
32,137


In single core, the difference is 93%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 20%.


Geekbench 4 is a complete benchmark platform with several types of tests, including data compression, images, AES encryption, SQL encoding, HTML, PDF file rendering, matrix computation, Fast Fourier Transform, 3D object simulation, photo editing, memory testing. This allows us to better visualize the respective power of these devices. For each result, we took an average of 250 values on the famous benchmark software.


On Windows:

Geekbench 5 - Multi-core & single core score - Windows
Dual Intel Xeon Silver 4210 745
8,014
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX 1,465
7,550


In single core, the difference is 97%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 6%.

On Linux:

Geekbench 5 - Multi-core & single core score - Linux
Dual Intel Xeon Silver 4210 824
12,641
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX 1,394
8,191


In single core, the difference is 69%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 54%.


Geekbench 5 is a software for measuring the performance of a computer system, for fixed devices, mobile devices, servers. This platform makes it possible to better compare the power of the CPU, the computing power and to compare it with similar or totally different systems. Geekbench 5 includes new workloads that represent work tasks and applications that we can find in reality.


Equivalence:

AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX Intel equivalentDual Intel Xeon Silver 4210 AMD equivalent

See also:

AMD Ryzen 9 5900HAMD Ryzen 9 5900HS

Dual Intel Xeon Silver 4216Intel Xeon Silver 4210Intel Xeon Silver 4216




GadgetVersus.com © 2021 - Information - XML sitemap - Privacy policy - Advertising policy - Contact

Disclaimer:

When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

This page includes affiliate links for which the administrator of GadgetVersus may earn a commission at no extra cost to you should you make a purchase. These links are indicated using the hashtag #ad.


Information:

We do not assume any responsibility for the data displayed on our website. Please use at your own risk. Some or all of this data may be out of date or incomplete, please refer to the technical page on the respective manufacturer's website to find the latest up-to-date information regarding the specifics of these products.


Trading System Forex W3Ask W3Ask Brasil W3Ask Deutschland W3Ask España W3Ask France W3Ask Italia W3Ask Nederland