AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS vs Intel Core Ultra 5 125U


AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS on Amazon USA
Intel Core Ultra 5 125U on Amazon USA

Comparison of the technical characteristics between the processors, with the AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS on one side and the Intel Core Ultra 5 125U on the other side, also their respective performances with the benchmarks. The first is dedicated to the laptop sector, It has 8 cores, 16 threads, a maximum frequency of 5.1GHz. The second is used on the laptop segment, it has a total of 14 cores, 18 threads, its turbo frequency is set to 4.3 GHz. The following table also compares the lithography, the number of transistors (if indicated), the amount of cache memory, the maximum RAM memory capacity, the type of memory accepted, the release date, the maximum number of PCIe lanes, the values ​​obtained in Geekbench and Cinebench.






Specification comparison:


Processor AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS Intel Core Ultra 5 125U
Market (main)Laptop Laptop
ISAx86-64 (64 bit) x86-64 (64 bit)
MicroarchitectureZen 4 Redwood Cove + Crestmont
Core nameHawk Point Meteor Lake-H
FamilyRyzen 7 8000 Core Ultra 5
Part number(s), S-Spec

100-000001372 (FP7r2),
100-000001379 (FP7),
100-000001357 (FP8)

QQ80723058DB,
SRN6E
Release dateQ4 2023 Q4 2023
Lithography4 nm FinFET Intel 4
Cores8 14
Threads16 18
Base frequency3.3 GHz 1.3 GHz
Turbo frequency5.1 GHz 4.3 GHz
Energy cores

-

8 Cores 8 Threads @ 0.8 / 3.6 GHz,
2 Cores 2 Threads @ 0.7 / 2.1 GHz
High performance cores

8 Cores 16 Threads @ 3.3 / 5.1 GHz

2 Cores 4 Threads @ 1.3 / 4.3 GHz
Cache memory16 MB 12 MB
Max memory capacity256 GB 96 GB
Memory types

DDR5-5600, LPDDR5x-7500

LPDDR5/x 7467 MT/s, DDR5 5600 MT/s
Max # of memory channels2 2
Max PCIe lanes20 20
TDP28 W 15 W
GPU integrated graphicsAMD Radeon 780M Intel Graphics (Meteor Lake)
GPU cores12 4
GPU shading units768 -
GPU base clock800 MHz 300 MHz
GPU boost clock2700 MHz 1850 MHz
GPU FP32 floating point8,294.4 GFLOPS -
SocketFP7, FP7r2, FP8 BGA2049
Maximum temperature100°C 110°C
AI accelerator

AMD Ryzen AI

Intel AI Boost @ 1.4 GHz
AI computing operations per seconds16 TOPS -
Crypto engine

AES Instructions

AES New Instructions,
Secure Key
Security

Enhanced Virus Protection

Control-Flow Enforcement Technology,
Trusted Execution Technology,
OS Guard,
Boot Guard
Max display resolution

7680 x 4320@60Hz (DP),
3840 x 2160@240Hz (DP),
3440 x 1440@360Hz (DP),
2560 x 1440@480Hz (DP),
1920 x 1080@600Hz (DP)

4096x2304@60Hz (HDMI),
7680x4320@60Hz (HDMI),
7680x4320@60Hz (DP),
3840x2400@120Hz (eDP)
Video decoding

H.265 4320p49

-
Video encoding

H.265 4320p43

-
PassMark single thread3,506 3,497
PassMark CPU Mark25,262 18,783
(Windows)
Geekbench 5 single core
1,856 1,531
(Windows)
Geekbench 5 multi-core
10,725 8,553
(Windows)
Geekbench 6 single core
2,494 2,109
(Windows)
Geekbench 6 multi-core
11,485 9,129
Amazon
eBay



We can better compare what are the technical differences between the two processors.

Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.

The processor Intel Core Ultra 5 125U has a larger number of cores, the maximum frequency of AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS is greater, that the thermal dissipation power of Intel Core Ultra 5 125U is less. Both were produced in the same year.

Performance comparison with the benchmarks:


Performance comparison between the two processors, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark software such as Geekbench.


PassMark - CPU Mark & single thread
AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS 3,506
25,262
Intel Core Ultra 5 125U 3,497
18,783


In single core, the difference is 0%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 34%.


PassMark is a benchmarking software that performs several performance tests including prime numbers, integers, floating point, compression, physics, extended instructions, encoding, sorting. The higher the score is, the higher is the device capacity.




With Windows:

Geekbench 5 - Multi-core & Single Core Score - Windows
AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS 1,856
10,725
Intel Core Ultra 5 125U 1,531
8,553


In single core, the difference is 21%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 25%.


Geekbench 5 is a software for measuring the performance of a computer system, for fixed devices, mobile devices, servers. This platform makes it possible to better compare the power of the CPU, the computing power and to compare it with similar or totally different systems. Geekbench 5 includes new workloads that represent work tasks and applications that we can find in reality.




With Windows:

Geekbench 6 - Multi-core & Single Core Score - Windows
AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS 2,494
11,485
Intel Core Ultra 5 125U 2,109
9,129


In single core, the difference is 18%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 26%.


Geekbench 6 is a benchmarking platform that is capable of evaluating the performance of a device across multiple operating systems. The software evaluates processor power, with its ability to support different tasks, such as file compression, browsing; GPU computing capabilities, with image editing, video editing, gaming skills, machine learning workloads.


Equivalence:

AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS Intel EquivalentIntel Core Ultra 5 125U AMD Equivalent

See also:

Intel Core Ultra 5 125HIntel Core Ultra 5 125HLIntel Core Ultra 5 125UL




GadgetVersus.com © 2024 - About us - XML sitemap - Privacy policy - Advertising policy - Contact

Disclaimer:

When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

This page includes affiliate links for which the administrator of GadgetVersus may earn a commission at no extra cost to you should you make a purchase. These links are indicated using the hashtag #ad.


Information:

We do not assume any responsibility for the data displayed on our website. Please use at your own risk. Some or all of this data may be out of date or incomplete, please refer to the technical page on the respective manufacturer's website to find the latest up-to-date information regarding the specifics of these products.