AMD Ryzen 7 3700U vs AMD Ryzen 7 2700U
Comparison of the technical characteristics between the processors, with the AMD Ryzen 7 3700U on one side and the AMD Ryzen 7 2700U on the other side. The first is dedicated to the laptop sector, It has 4 cores, 8 threads, a maximum frequency of 4.0GHz. The second is used on the laptop segment, it has a total of 4 cores, 8 threads, its turbo frequency is set to 3.8 GHz. The following table also compares the lithography, the number of transistors (if indicated), the amount of cache memory, the maximum RAM memory capacity, the type of memory accepted, the date of first broadcast, the maximum number of PCIe lines, the values obtained in Geekbench 4 and Cinebench R15, as well as an average price.
Specifications:
| Processor | |
AMD Ryzen 7 3700U |
| | |
AMD Ryzen 7 2700U |
| |
| Market | |
Laptop |
| | |
Laptop |
| |
| Family | |
Zen+ |
| | |
Zen |
| |
| Part number(s), S-Spec | |
YM3700C4T4MFG |
| | |
YM2700C4T4MFB |
| |
| Release date | |
Q1 2019 |
| | |
Q4 2017 |
| |
| Lithography | |
12 nm |
| | |
14 nm |
| |
| Transistors | |
4,940,000,000 |
| | |
4,950,000,000 |
| |
| Cores | |
4 |
| | |
4 |
| |
| Threads | |
8 |
| | |
8 |
| |
| Base frequency | |
2.3 GHz |
| | |
2.2 GHz |
| |
| Turbo frequency | |
4.0 GHz |
| | |
3.8 GHz |
| |
| Cache memory | |
4 MB |
| | |
4 MB |
| |
| Max memory capacity | |
32 GB |
| | |
32 GB |
| |
| Memory types | |
DDR4-2400 |
| | |
DDR4-2400 |
| |
| Max PCIe lanes | |
12 |
| | |
12 |
| |
| TDP | |
15 W |
| | |
15 W |
| |
| GPU integrated graphics | |
AMD Radeon RX Vega 10 Graphics |
| | |
AMD Radeon RX Vega 10 Graphics |
| |
| GPU execution units | |
10 |
| | |
10 |
| |
| GPU shading units | |
640 |
| | |
640 |
| |
| GPU clock rate | |
1,300 MHz |
| | |
1,300 MHz |
| |
| GPU FP32 floating point | |
1,664 GFLOPS |
| | |
1,664 GFLOPS |
| |
| Socket | |
FP5 |
| | |
FP5 |
| |
| Cinebench R15 single thread | |
139 |
| | |
139 |
| |
| Cinebench R15 multi-thread | |
676 |
| | |
597 |
| |
| PassMark single thread | |
2,040 |
| | |
1,520 |
| |
| PassMark CPU Mark | |
7,390 |
| | |
6,360 |
| |
(Windows 64-bit)
Geekbench 4 single core | |
3,552 |
| | |
3,135 |
| |
(Windows 64-bit)
Geekbench 4 multi-core | |
10,129 |
| | |
8,516 |
| |
(SGEMM)
GFLOPS performance | |
106 GFLOPS |
| | |
112.1 GFLOPS |
| |
(Multi-core / price performance)
Performance / price ratio | |
12 pts / $ |
| | |
16 pts / $ |
| |
(Multi-core / watt performance)
Performance / watt ratio | |
675 pts / W |
| | |
568 pts / W |
| |
(Multi-core / global cost performance)
Performance / global cost ratio | |
11 pts / $ |
| | |
15 pts / $ |
| |
| Note | |
4 / 5 |
| | |
3.7 / 5 |
| |
| Reviews | |
71 |
| | |
190 |
| |
| Amazon | |
AMD Ryzen 7 3700U |
| | |
AMD Ryzen 7 2700U |
| |
(Average)
New price on Amazon | |
$880 |
| | |
$520 |
| |
(Average)
Used price on Amazon | |
- |
| | |
$900 |
| |
| eBay | |
AMD Ryzen 7 3700U |
| | |
AMD Ryzen 7 2700U |
| |
(Average)
New price on eBay | |
$810 |
| | |
$830 |
| |
(Average)
Used price on eBay | |
$650 |
| | |
$580 |
| |
Price: prices can change over time. For technical reasons, they are not updated in real time. This is only an average of the results on the first page of each product, whether new or used. Shipping costs have not been integrated. To know the final price of the product, please go to the form of the shop. If no price is indicated, it means that we did not find any offers during the last update.
We can better compare what are the technical differences between the two processors. We see that the two processors have an equivalent number of cores, the maximum frequency of AMD Ryzen 7 3700U is greater, that their respective TDP are of the same order. The AMD Ryzen 7 3700U was designed earlier.
Ratios: we first consider the average for the new price if available, the average for the used price otherwise. Performance / global cost ratio: This is the ratio of performance on Geekbench 4, divided by the cost of the product + the cost of electricity over 5 years for a duration of use of 13 hours per day.
Performances :
Performance comparison between the two processors, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark software such as Geekbench 4.
In a single core, there is no noticeable difference. In multi-core, the differential gap is 13%.
Cinebench R15 evaluates the performance of CPU calculations by restoring a photorealistic 3D scene. The scene has 2,000 objects, 300,000 polygons, uses sharp and fuzzy reflections, bright areas, shadows, procedural shaders, antialiasing, and so on. The faster the rendering of the scene is created, the more powerful the PC is, with a high number of points.
In single core, the difference is 34%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 16%.
PassMark is a benchmarking software that performs several performance tests including prime numbers, integers, floating point, compression, physics, extended instructions, encoding, sorting. The higher the score is, the higher is the device capacity.
On Windows 64-bit:
In single core, the difference is 13%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 19%.
On Linux 64-bit:
In single core, the difference is 13%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 3%.
Geekbench 4 is a complete benchmark platform with several types of tests, including data compression, images, AES encryption, SQL encoding, HTML, PDF file rendering, matrix computation, Fast Fourier Transform, 3D object simulation, photo editing, memory testing. This allows us to better visualize the respective power of these devices. For each result, we took an average of 250 values on the famous benchmark software.
FR