GadgetVersus Smartphone Processor


AMD Ryzen 7 2700U vs AMD Ryzen 5 2500U


AMD Ryzen 7 2700U on Amazon USA
AMD Ryzen 5 2500U on Amazon USA

Comparison of the technical characteristics between the processors, with the AMD Ryzen 7 2700U on one side and the AMD Ryzen 5 2500U on the other side. The first is dedicated to the laptop sector, It has 4 cores, 8 threads, a maximum frequency of 3.8GHz. The second is used on the laptop segment, it has a total of 4 cores, 8 threads, its turbo frequency is set to 3.6 GHz. The following table also compares the lithography, the number of transistors (if indicated), the amount of cache memory, the maximum RAM memory capacity, the type of memory accepted, the date of first broadcast, the maximum number of PCIe lines, the values ​​obtained in Geekbench 4 and Cinebench R15, as well as an average price.

Specifications:


Processor AMD Ryzen 7 2700U AMD Ryzen 5 2500U
Market Laptop Laptop
Family Zen Zen
Part number(s), S-Spec YM2700C4T4MFB YM2500C4T4MFB
Release date Q4 2017 Q4 2017
Lithography 14 nm 14 nm
Transistors 4,950,000,000 4,950,000,000
Cores 4 4
Threads 8 8
Base frequency 2.2 GHz 2.0 GHz
Turbo frequency 3.8 GHz 3.6 GHz
Cache memory 4 MB 4 MB
Max memory capacity 32 GB 32 GB
Memory types DDR4-2400 DDR4-2400
Max PCIe lanes 12 12
TDP 15 W 15 W
GPU integrated graphics AMD Radeon RX Vega 10 Graphics AMD Radeon Vega 8 Graphics
GPU execution units 10 -
GPU shading units 640 -
GPU base clock rate 300 MHz -
GPU max clock rate 1,300 MHz 1100 MHz
GPU FP32 floating point 1,664 GFLOPS -
Socket FP5 FP5
Cinebench R15 single thread 139 137
Cinebench R15 multi-thread 597 609
PassMark single thread 1,520 1,810
PassMark CPU Mark 6,360 6,590
(Windows 64-bit)
Geekbench 4 single core
3,135 3,138
(Windows 64-bit)
Geekbench 4 multi-core
8,516 8,623
(SGEMM)
GFLOPS performance
112.1 GFLOPS 116.9 GFLOPS
(Multi-core / price performance)
Performance / price ratio
16 pts / $ 16 pts / $
(Multi-core / watt performance)
Performance / watt ratio
568 pts / W 575 pts / W
(Multi-core / global cost performance)
Performance / global cost ratio
15 pts / $ 15 pts / $
Note 3.7 / 5 4 / 5
Reviews 190 448
Amazon AMD Ryzen 7 2700U AMD Ryzen 5 2500U
(Average)
New price on Amazon
$520 -
(Average)
Used price on Amazon
$900 -
eBay AMD Ryzen 7 2700U AMD Ryzen 5 2500U
(Average)
New price on eBay
$830 $550
(Average)
Used price on eBay
$580 $370


Price: prices can change over time. For technical reasons, they are not updated in real time. This is only an average of the results on the first page of each product, whether new or used. Shipping costs have not been integrated. To know the final price of the product, please go to the form of the shop. If no price is indicated, it means that we did not find any offers during the last update.

We can better compare what are the technical differences between the two processors. We see that the two processors have an equivalent number of cores, the maximum frequency of AMD Ryzen 7 2700U is greater, that their respective TDP are of the same order. Both were produced in the same year.

Ratios: we first consider the average for the new price if available, the average for the used price otherwise. Performance / global cost ratio: This is the ratio of performance on Geekbench 4, divided by the cost of the product + the cost of electricity over 5 years for a duration of use of 13 hours per day.

Performances :


Performance comparison between the two processors, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark software such as Geekbench 4.


Cinebench R15 - Multi-thread & single thread score
AMD Ryzen 5 2500U 137
609
AMD Ryzen 7 2700U 139
597


In single core, the difference is 1%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 2%.

Cinebench R15 evaluates the performance of CPU calculations by restoring a photorealistic 3D scene. The scene has 2,000 objects, 300,000 polygons, uses sharp and fuzzy reflections, bright areas, shadows, procedural shaders, antialiasing, and so on. The faster the rendering of the scene is created, the more powerful the PC is, with a high number of points.


PassMark - CPU Mark & single thread
AMD Ryzen 5 2500U 1,810
6,590
AMD Ryzen 7 2700U 1,520
6,360


In single core, the difference is 19%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 4%.

PassMark is a benchmarking software that performs several performance tests including prime numbers, integers, floating point, compression, physics, extended instructions, encoding, sorting. The higher the score is, the higher is the device capacity.


On Windows 64-bit:

Geekbench 4 - Multi-core & single core score - Windows 64-bit
AMD Ryzen 5 2500U 3,138
8,623
AMD Ryzen 7 2700U 3,135
8,516


In single core, the difference is 0%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 1%.

On Linux 64-bit:

Geekbench 4 - Multi-core & single core score - Linux 64-bit
AMD Ryzen 7 2700U 3,746
9,864
AMD Ryzen 5 2500U 3,016
8,517


In single core, the difference is 24%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 16%.

On Android 64-bit:

Geekbench 4 - Multi-core & single core score - Android 64-bit
AMD Ryzen 5 2500U 4,236
11,929
AMD Ryzen 7 2700U 3,496
9,049


In single core, the difference is 21%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 32%.

Geekbench 4 is a complete benchmark platform with several types of tests, including data compression, images, AES encryption, SQL encoding, HTML, PDF file rendering, matrix computation, Fast Fourier Transform, 3D object simulation, photo editing, memory testing. This allows us to better visualize the respective power of these devices. For each result, we took an average of 250 values on the famous benchmark software.






Trading System Forex W3Ask W3Ask Brasil W3Ask Deutschland W3Ask España W3Ask France W3Ask Italia W3Ask Nederland