AMD Ryzen 5 8600G vs Intel Core i5-14400F


AMD Ryzen 5 8600G on Amazon USA
Intel Core i5-14400F on Amazon USA

Comparison of the technical characteristics between the processors, with the AMD Ryzen 5 8600G on one side and the Intel Core i5-14400F on the other side, also their respective performances with the benchmarks. The first is dedicated to the desktop sector, It has 6 cores, 12 threads, a maximum frequency of 5.0GHz. The second is used on the desktop segment, it has a total of 10 cores, 16 threads, its turbo frequency is set to 4.7 GHz. The following table also compares the lithography, the number of transistors (if indicated), the amount of cache memory, the maximum RAM memory capacity, the type of memory accepted, the release date, the maximum number of PCIe lanes, the values ​​obtained in Geekbench and Cinebench.






Specification comparison:


Processor AMD Ryzen 5 8600G Intel Core i5-14400F
Market (main)Desktop Desktop
ISAx86-64 (64 bit) x86-64 (64 bit)
MicroarchitectureZen 4 Raptor Cove + Gracemont
Core namePhoenix Raptor Lake Refresh-S
FamilyRyzen 5 8000 Core i5-14000
Part number(s), S-Spec

100-100001237,
100-100001237BOX,
100-100001237MPK

BX8071514400F,
CM8071504821113,
CM8071505093011,
SRN47, SRN3R
Release dateQ1 2024 Q1 2024
Lithography4 nm FinFET Intel 7
Cores6 10
Threads12 16
Base frequency4.3 GHz 2.5 GHz
Turbo frequency5.0 GHz 4.7 GHz
Energy cores

-

4 Cores 4 Threads @ 1.8 / 3.5 GHz
High performance cores

6 Cores 12 Threads @ 4.3 / 5.0 GHz

6 Cores 12 Threads @ 2.5 / 4.7 GHz
Cache memory16 MB 20 MB
Max memory capacity256 GB 192 GB
Memory types

DDR5-5200, DDR5-3600

DDR5 4800 MT/s, DDR4 3200 MT/s
Max # of memory channels1 2
Max PCIe lanes16 20
TDP65 W 65 W
Suggested PSU600W ATX Power Supply 600W ATX Power Supply
GPU integrated graphicsAMD Radeon 760M None
GPU cores8 -
GPU shading units512 -
GPU base clock800 MHz -
GPU boost clock2800 MHz -
GPU FP32 floating point5,322.8 GFLOPS -
SocketAM5 LGA1700
Compatible motherboardSocket AM5 Motherboard  Socket LGA 1700 Motherboard 
Maximum temperature95°C 100°C
AI accelerator

AMD Ryzen AI

Gaussian & Neural Accelerator,
Deep Learning Boost
AI computing operations per seconds16 TOPS -
Crypto engine

AES Instructions

AES New Instructions,
Secure Key
Security

Enhanced Virus Protection

OS Guard,
Execute Disable Bit,
Boot Guard,
Mode-based Execute Control,
Control-Flow Enforcement Technology
Max display resolution

7680 x 4320@60Hz (DP),
3840 x 2160@240Hz (DP),
3440 x 1440@360Hz (DP),
2560 x 1440@480Hz (DP),
1920 x 1080@600Hz (DP)

-
Video decoding

4320p49 H.265

-
Video encoding

4320p43 H.265

-
CPU-Z single thread704 743
CPU-Z multi thread5,671 6,649
Cinebench R15 single thread285 269
Cinebench R15 multi-thread2,139 2,471
Cinebench R20 single thread679 691
Cinebench R20 multi-thread5,027 6,310
Cinebench R23 single thread1,766 1,812
Cinebench R23 multi-thread13,366 16,448
Cinebench 2024 single thread106 103
Cinebench 2024 multi-thread773 890
PassMark single thread3,923 3,758
PassMark CPU Mark25,926 25,754
(Windows)
Geekbench 4 single core
7,959 7,760
(Windows)
Geekbench 4 multi-core
41,317 43,036
(Windows)
Geekbench 5 single core
1,966 1,781
(Windows)
Geekbench 5 multi-core
10,147 11,813
(Windows)
Geekbench 6 single core
2,714 2,237
(Windows)
Geekbench 6 multi-core
11,652 13,023
(SGEMM)
GFLOPS Performance
724 GFLOPS 657.9 GFLOPS
(Multi-core / watt performance)
Performance / watt ratio
636 pts / W 662 pts / W
Amazon
eBay



We can better compare what are the technical differences between the two processors.

Suggested PSU: We assume that we have an ATX computer case, a high end graphics card, 16GB RAM, a 512GB SSD, a 1TB HDD hard drive, a Blu-Ray drive. We will have to rely on a more powerful power supply if we want to have several graphics cards, several monitors, more memory, etc.

Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.

The processor Intel Core i5-14400F has a larger number of cores, the maximum frequency of AMD Ryzen 5 8600G is greater, that their respective TDP are of the same order. Both were produced in the same year.

Performance comparison with the benchmarks:


Performance comparison between the two processors, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark software such as Geekbench.


CPU-Z - Multi-Thread & Single Thread Score
Intel Core i5-14400F 743
6,649
AMD Ryzen 5 8600G 704
5,671


In single core, the difference is 6%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 17%.


CPU-Z is a system information software that provides the name of the processor, its model number, the codename, the cache levels, the package, the process. It can also gives data about the mainboard, the memory. It makes real time measurement, with finally a benchmark for the single thread, as well as for the multi thread.




Cinebench R15 - Multi-Thread & Single Thread Score
Intel Core i5-14400F 269
2,471
AMD Ryzen 5 8600G 285
2,139


In single core, the difference is 6%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 16%.


Cinebench R15 evaluates the performance of CPU calculations by restoring a photorealistic 3D scene. The scene has 2,000 objects, 300,000 polygons, uses sharp and fuzzy reflections, bright areas, shadows, procedural shaders, antialiasing, and so on. The faster the rendering of the scene is created, the more powerful the PC is, with a high number of points.


Cinebench R20 - Multi-Thread & Single Thread Score
Intel Core i5-14400F 691
6,310
AMD Ryzen 5 8600G 679
5,027


In single core, the difference is 2%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 26%.


Cinebench R20 is a multi-platform test software which allows to evaluate the hardware capacities of a device such as a computer, a tablet, a server. This version of Cinebench takes into account recent developments in processors with multiple cores and the latest improvements in rendering techniques. The evaluation is ultimately even more relevant.




Cinebench R23 - Multi-Thread & Single Thread Score
Intel Core i5-14400F 1,812
16,448
AMD Ryzen 5 8600G 1,766
13,366


In single core, the difference is 3%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 23%.


Cinebench R23 is cross-platform testing software that allows you to assess the hardware capabilities of a device such as a computer, tablet, server. This version of Cinebench takes into account recent developments in processors with multiple cores and the latest improvements in rendering techniques. The evaluation is ultimately even more relevant. The test scene contains no less than 2,000 objects and more than 300,000 polygons in total.


Cinebench 2024 - Multi-Thread & Single Thread Score
Intel Core i5-14400F 103
890
AMD Ryzen 5 8600G 106
773


In single core, the difference is 3%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 15%.


Cinebench 2024 is a benchmarking software that includes various tools for 3D modeling, animation, visual effects, motion graphics, composition and color grading capabilities. With for example a GPU-accelerated rendering engine, a 3D simulation tool, digital sculpture and painting, intelligent assets, models, shaders, and other materials, production tools.


PassMark - CPU Mark & single thread
AMD Ryzen 5 8600G 3,923
25,926
Intel Core i5-14400F 3,758
25,754


In single core, the difference is 4%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 1%.


PassMark is a benchmarking software that performs several performance tests including prime numbers, integers, floating point, compression, physics, extended instructions, encoding, sorting. The higher the score is, the higher is the device capacity.




With Windows:

Geekbench 4 - Multi-core & Single Core Score - Windows
Intel Core i5-14400F 7,760
43,036
AMD Ryzen 5 8600G 7,959
41,317


In single core, the difference is 3%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 4%.


Geekbench 4 is a complete benchmark platform with several types of tests, including data compression, images, AES encryption, SQL encoding, HTML, PDF file rendering, matrix computation, Fast Fourier Transform, 3D object simulation, photo editing, memory testing. This allows us to better visualize the respective power of these devices. For each result, we took an average of 250 values on the famous benchmark software.


With Windows:

Geekbench 5 - Multi-core & Single Core Score - Windows
Intel Core i5-14400F 1,781
11,813
AMD Ryzen 5 8600G 1,966
10,147


In single core, the difference is 10%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 16%.


Geekbench 5 is a software for measuring the performance of a computer system, for fixed devices, mobile devices, servers. This platform makes it possible to better compare the power of the CPU, the computing power and to compare it with similar or totally different systems. Geekbench 5 includes new workloads that represent work tasks and applications that we can find in reality.




With Windows:

Geekbench 6 - Multi-core & Single Core Score - Windows
Intel Core i5-14400F 2,237
13,023
AMD Ryzen 5 8600G 2,714
11,652


In single core, the difference is 21%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 12%.

With Linux:

Geekbench 6 - Multi-core & Single Core Score - Linux
Intel Core i5-14400F 2,557
12,610
AMD Ryzen 5 8600G 2,696
12,366


In single core, the difference is 5%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 2%.


Geekbench 6 is a benchmarking platform that is capable of evaluating the performance of a device across multiple operating systems. The software evaluates processor power, with its ability to support different tasks, such as file compression, browsing; GPU computing capabilities, with image editing, video editing, gaming skills, machine learning workloads.


Equivalence:

AMD Ryzen 5 8600G Intel EquivalentIntel Core i5-14400F AMD Equivalent

See also:

Intel Core i5-14400Intel Core i5-14400T




GadgetVersus.com © 2024 - About us - XML sitemap - Privacy policy - Advertising policy - Contact

Disclaimer:

When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

This page includes affiliate links for which the administrator of GadgetVersus may earn a commission at no extra cost to you should you make a purchase. These links are indicated using the hashtag #ad.


Information:

We do not assume any responsibility for the data displayed on our website. Please use at your own risk. Some or all of this data may be out of date or incomplete, please refer to the technical page on the respective manufacturer's website to find the latest up-to-date information regarding the specifics of these products.