AMD Ryzen 5 5600X vs AMD Ryzen 7 3700X
Comparison of the technical characteristics between the processors, with the AMD Ryzen 5 5600X on one side and the AMD Ryzen 7 3700X on the other side. The first is dedicated to the desktop sector, It has 6 cores, 12 threads, a maximum frequency of 4.6GHz. The second is used on the desktop segment, it has a total of 8 cores, 16 threads, its turbo frequency is set to 4.4 GHz. The following table also compares the lithography, the number of transistors (if indicated), the amount of cache memory, the maximum RAM memory capacity, the type of memory accepted, the release date, the maximum number of PCIe lanes, the values obtained in Geekbench 4 and Cinebench R15.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
This page contains references to products from one or more of our advertisers. We may receive compensation when you click on links to those products. For an explanation of our advertising policy, please
visit this page.
Specifications:
| Processor | |
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X |
| | |
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X |
| |
| Market | |
Desktop |
| | |
Desktop |
| |
| Family | |
Zen 3 |
| | |
Zen 2 |
| |
| Part number(s), S-Spec | |
100-000000065,
100-100000065BOX,
100-100000065MPK |
| | |
100-000000071,
100-100000071BOX |
| |
| Release date | |
Q4 2020 |
| | |
Q3 2019 |
| |
| Lithography | |
7 nm FinFET |
| | |
7 nm FinFET |
| |
| Transistors | |
- |
| | |
19,200,000,000 |
| |
| Cores | |
6 |
| | |
8 |
| |
| Threads | |
12 |
| | |
16 |
| |
| Base frequency | |
3.7 GHz |
| | |
3.6 GHz |
| |
| Turbo frequency | |
4.6 GHz |
| | |
4.4 GHz |
| |
| Cache memory | |
32 MB |
| | |
32 MB |
| |
| Max memory capacity | |
128 GB |
| | |
128 GB |
| |
| Memory types | |
DDR4-3200 |
| | |
DDR4-3200 |
| |
| Max # of memory channels | |
2 |
| | |
2 |
| |
| Max memory bandwidth | |
47.68 GB/s |
| | |
47.68 GB/s |
| |
| Max PCIe lanes | |
40 |
| | |
20 |
| |
| TDP | |
65 W |
| | |
65 W |
| |
| GPU integrated graphics | |
None |
| | |
None |
| |
| Socket | |
AM4 |
| | |
AM4 |
| |
| CPU-Z single thread | |
629 |
| | |
508 |
| |
| CPU-Z multi thread | |
4,871 |
| | |
5,459 |
| |
| Cinebench R15 single thread | |
261 |
| | |
200 |
| |
| Cinebench R15 multi-thread | |
1,971 |
| | |
2,100 |
| |
| Cinebench R20 single thread | |
605 |
| | |
480 |
| |
| Cinebench R20 multi-thread | |
4,434 |
| | |
4,760 |
| |
| PassMark single thread | |
3,378 |
| | |
2,680 |
| |
| PassMark CPU Mark | |
22,192 |
| | |
22,720 |
| |
(Windows 64-bit)
Geekbench 4 single core | |
6,975 |
| | |
5,602 |
| |
(Windows 64-bit)
Geekbench 4 multi-core | |
33,553 |
| | |
34,342 |
| |
(Windows)
Geekbench 5 single core | |
1,616 |
| | |
1,239 |
| |
(Windows)
Geekbench 5 multi-core | |
8,275 |
| | |
8,521 |
| |
(SGEMM)
GFLOPS performance | |
408 GFLOPS |
| | |
546 GFLOPS |
| |
(Multi-core / watt performance)
Performance / watt ratio | |
516 pts / W |
| | |
528 pts / W |
| |
| Amazon | |
 |
| | |
|
| |
| eBay | |
 |
| | |
|
| |
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
We can better compare what are the technical differences between the two processors. The processor AMD Ryzen 7 3700X has a larger number of cores, the maximum frequency of AMD Ryzen 5 5600X is greater, that their respective TDP are of the same order. The AMD Ryzen 5 5600X was designed earlier.
Performances :
Performance comparison between the two processors, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark software such as Geekbench 4.
In single core, the difference is 24%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 12%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
CPU-Z is a system information software that provides the name of the processor, its model number, the codename, the cache levels, the package, the process. It can also gives data about the mainboard, the memory. It makes real time measurement, with finally a benchmark for the single thread, as well as for the multi thread.
In single core, the difference is 31%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 7%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
Cinebench R15 evaluates the performance of CPU calculations by restoring a photorealistic 3D scene. The scene has 2,000 objects, 300,000 polygons, uses sharp and fuzzy reflections, bright areas, shadows, procedural shaders, antialiasing, and so on. The faster the rendering of the scene is created, the more powerful the PC is, with a high number of points.
In single core, the difference is 26%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 7%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
Cinebench R20 is a multi-platform test software which allows to evaluate the hardware capacities of a device such as a computer, a tablet, a server. This version of Cinebench takes into account recent developments in processors with multiple cores and the latest improvements in rendering techniques. The evaluation is ultimately even more relevant.
In single core, the difference is 26%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 2%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
PassMark is a benchmarking software that performs several performance tests including prime numbers, integers, floating point, compression, physics, extended instructions, encoding, sorting. The higher the score is, the higher is the device capacity.
On Windows 64-bit:
In single core, the difference is 25%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 2%.
On Linux 64-bit:
In single core, the difference is 15%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 2%.
On Mac OS X 64-bit:
In single core, the difference is 67%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 31%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
Geekbench 4 is a complete benchmark platform with several types of tests, including data compression, images, AES encryption, SQL encoding, HTML, PDF file rendering, matrix computation, Fast Fourier Transform, 3D object simulation, photo editing, memory testing. This allows us to better visualize the respective power of these devices. For each result, we took an average of 250 values on the famous benchmark software.
On Windows:
In single core, the difference is 30%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 3%.
On Linux:
In single core, the difference is 32%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 4%.
On macOS:
In single core, the difference is 32%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 7%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
Geekbench 5 is a software for measuring the performance of a computer system, for fixed devices, mobile devices, servers. This platform makes it possible to better compare the power of the CPU, the computing power and to compare it with similar or totally different systems. Geekbench 5 includes new workloads that represent work tasks and applications that we can find in reality.
Equivalence:
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X Intel equivalentAMD Ryzen 7 3700X Intel equivalentSee also:
AMD Ryzen 5 5600AMD Ryzen 5 5600HAMD Ryzen 5 5600HSAMD Ryzen 5 5600UAMD Ryzen 7 3700U
FR