GadgetVersus Smartphone Processor Graphics card


AMD Ryzen 5 5600X vs AMD Ryzen 7 3700X


AMD Ryzen 5 5600X on Amazon USA
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X on Amazon USA

Comparison of the technical characteristics between the processors, with the AMD Ryzen 5 5600X on one side and the AMD Ryzen 7 3700X on the other side. The first is dedicated to the desktop sector, It has 6 cores, 12 threads, a maximum frequency of 4.6GHz. The second is used on the desktop segment, it has a total of 8 cores, 16 threads, its turbo frequency is set to 4.4 GHz. The following table also compares the lithography, the number of transistors (if indicated), the amount of cache memory, the maximum RAM memory capacity, the type of memory accepted, the release date, the maximum number of PCIe lanes, the values ​​obtained in Geekbench 4 and Cinebench R15.






Specifications:


Processor AMD Ryzen 5 5600X AMD Ryzen 7 3700X
Market Desktop Desktop
Family Zen 3 Zen 2
Part number(s), S-Spec 100-000000065,
100-100000065BOX,
100-100000065MPK
100-000000071,
100-100000071BOX
Release date Q4 2020 Q3 2019
Lithography 7 nm FinFET 7 nm FinFET
Transistors - 19,200,000,000
Cores 6 8
Threads 12 16
Base frequency 3.7 GHz 3.6 GHz
Turbo frequency 4.6 GHz 4.4 GHz
Cache memory 32 MB 32 MB
Max memory capacity 128 GB 128 GB
Memory types DDR4-3200 DDR4-3200
Max # of memory channels 2 2
Max memory bandwidth 47.68 GB/s 47.68 GB/s
Max PCIe lanes 20 20
TDP 65 W 65 W
Suggested PSU 600W ATX Power Supply #ad 600W ATX Power Supply #ad
GPU integrated graphics None None
Socket AM4 AM4
Compatible motherboard Socket AM4 Motherboard #ad Socket AM4 Motherboard #ad
Maximum temperature 95°C 95°C
CPU-Z single thread 629 508
CPU-Z multi thread 4,871 5,459
Cinebench R15 single thread 261 200
Cinebench R15 multi-thread 1,971 2,100
Cinebench R20 single thread 605 480
Cinebench R20 multi-thread 4,434 4,760
PassMark single thread 3,378 2,680
PassMark CPU Mark 22,192 22,720
(Windows 64-bit)
Geekbench 4 single core
6,975 5,602
(Windows 64-bit)
Geekbench 4 multi-core
33,553 34,342
(Windows)
Geekbench 5 single core
1,616 1,239
(Windows)
Geekbench 5 multi-core
8,275 8,521
(SGEMM)
GFLOPS performance
408 GFLOPS 546 GFLOPS
(Multi-core / watt performance)
Performance / watt ratio
516 pts / W 528 pts / W
Amazon
eBay



We can better compare what are the technical differences between the two processors.

Suggested PSU: We assume that we have An ATX computer case, a high end graphics card, 16GB RAM, a 512GB SSD, a 1TB HDD hard drive, a Blu-Ray drive. We will have to rely on a more powerful power supply if we want to have several graphics cards, several monitors, more memory, etc.

Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.

The processor AMD Ryzen 7 3700X has a larger number of cores, the maximum frequency of AMD Ryzen 5 5600X is greater, that their respective TDP are of the same order. The AMD Ryzen 5 5600X was designed earlier.

Performances :


Performance comparison between the two processors, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark software such as Geekbench 4.


CPU-Z - Multi-thread & single thread score
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X#ad 508
5,459
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X#ad 629
4,871


In single core, the difference is 24%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 12%.


CPU-Z is a system information software that provides the name of the processor, its model number, the codename, the cache levels, the package, the process. It can also gives data about the mainboard, the memory. It makes real time measurement, with finally a benchmark for the single thread, as well as for the multi thread.


Cinebench R15 - Multi-thread & single thread score
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X#ad 200
2,100
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X#ad 261
1,971


In single core, the difference is 31%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 7%.


Cinebench R15 evaluates the performance of CPU calculations by restoring a photorealistic 3D scene. The scene has 2,000 objects, 300,000 polygons, uses sharp and fuzzy reflections, bright areas, shadows, procedural shaders, antialiasing, and so on. The faster the rendering of the scene is created, the more powerful the PC is, with a high number of points.


Cinebench R20 - Multi-thread & single thread score
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X#ad 480
4,760
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X#ad 605
4,434


In single core, the difference is 26%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 7%.


Cinebench R20 is a multi-platform test software which allows to evaluate the hardware capacities of a device such as a computer, a tablet, a server. This version of Cinebench takes into account recent developments in processors with multiple cores and the latest improvements in rendering techniques. The evaluation is ultimately even more relevant.


PassMark - CPU Mark & single thread
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X#ad 2,680
22,720
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X#ad 3,378
22,192


In single core, the difference is 26%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 2%.


PassMark is a benchmarking software that performs several performance tests including prime numbers, integers, floating point, compression, physics, extended instructions, encoding, sorting. The higher the score is, the higher is the device capacity.





On Windows 64-bit:

Geekbench 4 - Multi-core & single core score - Windows 64-bit
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X#ad 5,602
34,342
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X#ad 6,975
33,553


In single core, the difference is 25%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 2%.

On Linux 64-bit:

Geekbench 4 - Multi-core & single core score - Linux 64-bit
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X#ad 6,975
38,157
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X#ad 6,080
37,556


In single core, the difference is 15%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 2%.

On Mac OS X 64-bit:

Geekbench 4 - Multi-core & single core score - Mac OS X 64-bit
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X#ad 9,573
46,982
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X#ad 5,744
35,990


In single core, the difference is 67%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 31%.


Geekbench 4 is a complete benchmark platform with several types of tests, including data compression, images, AES encryption, SQL encoding, HTML, PDF file rendering, matrix computation, Fast Fourier Transform, 3D object simulation, photo editing, memory testing. This allows us to better visualize the respective power of these devices. For each result, we took an average of 250 values on the famous benchmark software.


On Windows:

Geekbench 5 - Multi-core & single core score - Windows
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X#ad 1,239
8,521
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X#ad 1,616
8,275


In single core, the difference is 30%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 3%.

On Linux:

Geekbench 5 - Multi-core & single core score - Linux
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X#ad 1,752
9,040
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X#ad 1,331
8,729


In single core, the difference is 32%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 4%.

On macOS:

Geekbench 5 - Multi-core & single core score - macOS
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X#ad 1,654
8,416
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X#ad 1,251
7,897


In single core, the difference is 32%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 7%.


Geekbench 5 is a software for measuring the performance of a computer system, for fixed devices, mobile devices, servers. This platform makes it possible to better compare the power of the CPU, the computing power and to compare it with similar or totally different systems. Geekbench 5 includes new workloads that represent work tasks and applications that we can find in reality.


Equivalence:

AMD Ryzen 5 5600X Intel equivalentAMD Ryzen 7 3700X Intel equivalent

See also:

AMD Ryzen 5 5600AMD Ryzen 5 5600GAMD Ryzen 5 5600HAMD Ryzen 5 5600HSAMD Ryzen 5 5600U

AMD Ryzen 7 3700U




GadgetVersus.com © 2021 - Information - XML sitemap - Privacy policy - Advertising policy - Contact

Disclaimer:

When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

This page includes affiliate links for which the administrator of GadgetVersus may earn a commission at no extra cost to you should you make a purchase. These links are indicated using the hashtag #ad.


Information:

We do not assume any responsibility for the data displayed on our website. Please use at your own risk. Some or all of this data may be out of date or incomplete, please refer to the technical page on the respective manufacturer's website to find the latest up-to-date information regarding the specifics of these products.


Trading System Forex W3Ask W3Ask Brasil W3Ask Deutschland W3Ask España W3Ask France W3Ask Italia W3Ask Nederland