FR
AMD Ryzen 5 3550U vs Unisoc Tiger T310
Comparison of the technical characteristics between the processors, with the AMD Ryzen 5 3550U on one side and the Unisoc Tiger T310 on the other side. The first is dedicated to the touchscreen-based laptop sector, It has 4 cores, 8 threads, a maximum frequency of 3.7GHz. The second is used on the smartphone segment, it has a total of 4 cores, 4 threads, its turbo frequency is set to 2.0 GHz. The following table also compares the lithography, the number of transistors (if indicated), the amount of cache memory, the maximum RAM memory capacity, the type of memory accepted, the release date, the maximum number of PCIe lanes, the values obtained in Geekbench 4 and Cinebench R15.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
This page contains references to products from one or more of our advertisers. We may receive compensation when you click on links to those products. For an explanation of our advertising policy, please visit this page.
Specification comparison:
| Processor | AMD Ryzen 5 3550U | Unisoc Tiger T310 | ||||||
| Market (main) | Touchscreen-based laptop | Smartphone | ||||||
| ISA | x86-64 (64 bit) | ARMv8.2-A (64-bit) | ||||||
| Microarchitecture | Zen+ | Cortex-A75, Cortex-A55 | ||||||
| Core name | Picasso | Cortex-A75, Cortex-A55 | ||||||
| Family | Ryzen 5 3000 | Tiger | ||||||
| Part number(s), S-Spec | Ryzen 5 3550U |
Tiger T310, UMS312, Spreadtrum T310 |
||||||
| Release date | Q1 2020 | Q2 2019 | ||||||
| Lithography | 12 nm | 12 nm FF | ||||||
| Transistors | 4,940,000,000 | - | ||||||
| Cores | 4 | 4 | ||||||
| Threads | 8 | 4 | ||||||
| Base frequency | 2.1 GHz | 1.8 GHz | ||||||
| Turbo frequency | 3.7 GHz | 2.0 GHz | ||||||
| Energy cores | - |
3x ARM Cortex-A55 @ 1.8 GHz |
||||||
| High performance cores | - |
1x ARM Cortex-A75 @ 2.0 GHz |
||||||
| Cache memory | 4 MB | 1 MB | ||||||
| Max memory capacity | 32 GB | 4 GB | ||||||
| Memory types | DDR4-2400 |
LPDDR3 933, LPDDR4x 1333 |
||||||
| Max # of memory channels | 2 | 2 | ||||||
| Max memory bandwidth | 35.76 GB/s | 14 GB/s | ||||||
| TDP | 35 W | 5 W | ||||||
| GPU integrated graphics | AMD Radeon Vega 8 (Picasso) | Imagination PowerVR GT7200 | ||||||
| GPU cores | 8 | - | ||||||
| GPU execution units | - | 2 | ||||||
| GPU shading units | 512 | 64 | ||||||
| GPU base clock | 300 MHz | - | ||||||
| GPU boost clock | 1200 MHz | 800 MHz | ||||||
| GPU FP32 floating point | 1,229 GFLOPS | 83.2 GFLOPS | ||||||
| Socket | FP5 | SoC | ||||||
| Drystone MIPS | - | 33,047 DMIPS | ||||||
| AI accelerator | - |
DynamIQ |
||||||
| Max display resolution | - |
1080p30fps |
||||||
| Video decoding | - | H.264/AVC,H.265/HEVC 1080p30fps | ||||||
| Video encoding | - | H.264/AVC,H.265/HEVC 1080p30fps | ||||||
| Max camera ISP | - | 16MP; 16MP + 8MP | ||||||
| Cellular technologies | - | 4G | ||||||
| GNSS | - | GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou | ||||||
| LTE download speed | - | Up to 300 Mbit/s | ||||||
| LTE upload speed | - | Up to 150 Mbit/s | ||||||
| LTE category | - | LTE Cat.7 | ||||||
| Wi-Fi | - | Wi-Fi 5 a/b/g/n/ac | ||||||
| Bluetooth | - | Bluetooth 5.0 | ||||||
| (Windows 64-bit | Android 64-bit) Geekbench 4 single core | 3,916 | 1,456 | ||||||
| (Windows 64-bit | Android 64-bit) Geekbench 4 multi-core | 11,437 | 2,833 | ||||||
| (Windows | Android) Geekbench 5 single core | 727 | 360 | ||||||
| (Windows | Android) Geekbench 5 multi-core | 2,578 | 708 | ||||||
| (SGEMM) GFLOPS performance | 121.4 GFLOPS | 22.8 GFLOPS | ||||||
| (Multi-core / watt performance) Performance / watt ratio | 327 pts / W | 567 pts / W | ||||||
| Amazon |  |
|
||||||
| eBay |  |
|
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
We can better compare what are the technical differences between the two processors.
Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.
We see that the two processors have an equivalent number of cores, the maximum frequency of AMD Ryzen 5 3550U is greater, that the thermal dissipation power of Unisoc Tiger T310 is less. The AMD Ryzen 5 3550U was designed earlier.
Performance comparison with the benchmarks:
Performance comparison between the two processors, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark software such as Geekbench 4.
| Geekbench 5 - Multi-core & single core score - Windows & Android | |
|---|---|
AMD Ryzen 5 3550U |
727 2,578 |
| Unisoc Tiger T310 |
360 708 |
In single core, the difference is 102%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 264%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
Geekbench 5 is a software for measuring the performance of a computer system, for fixed devices, mobile devices, servers. This platform makes it possible to better compare the power of the CPU, the computing power and to compare it with similar or totally different systems. Geekbench 5 includes new workloads that represent work tasks and applications that we can find in reality.
Equivalence:
AMD Ryzen 5 3550U Intel equivalentUnisoc Tiger T310 Intel equivalentUnisoc Tiger T310 AMD equivalentSee also:
AMD Ryzen 5 3550HSmartphones with the processor Unisoc Tiger T310:
Blackview A70 ProCubot PocketOukitel C25Umidigi A13SUmidigi Bison X10GUmidigi Bison X10SDisclaimer:
When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
This page includes affiliate links for which the administrator of GadgetVersus may earn a commission at no extra cost to you should you make a purchase. These links are indicated using the hashtag #ad.
Information:
We do not assume any responsibility for the data displayed on our website. Please use at your own risk. Some or all of this data may be out of date or incomplete, please refer to the technical page on the respective manufacturer's website to find the latest up-to-date information regarding the specifics of these products.