AMD Ryzen 5 3450U vs Intel Core i5-4690

AMD Ryzen 5 3450U on Amazon USA
Intel Core i5-4690 on Amazon USA

Comparison of the technical characteristics between the processors, with the AMD Ryzen 5 3450U on one side and the Intel Core i5-4690 on the other side. The first is dedicated to the notebook sector, It has 4 cores, 8 threads, a maximum frequency of 3.5GHz. The second is used on the desktop segment, it has a total of 4 cores, 4 threads, its turbo frequency is set to 3.9 GHz. The following table also compares the lithography, the number of transistors (if indicated), the amount of cache memory, the maximum RAM memory capacity, the type of memory accepted, the release date, the maximum number of PCIe lanes, the values ​​obtained in Geekbench 4 and Cinebench R15.

Specification comparison:

Processor AMD Ryzen 5 3450U Intel Core i5-4690
Market (main) Notebook Desktop
ISA x86-64 (64 bit) x86-64 (64 bit)
Microarchitecture Zen+ Haswell
Core name Picasso Haswell-DT
Family Ryzen 5 3000 Core i5-4000
Part number(s), S-Spec


Release date Q4 2020 Q2 2014
Lithography 12 nm 22 nm
Transistors - 1,400,000,000
Cores 4 4
Threads 8 4
Base frequency 2.1 GHz 3.5 GHz
Turbo frequency 3.5 GHz 3.9 GHz
Cache memory 4 MB 6 MB
Max memory capacity 32 GB 32 GB
Memory types


Max # of memory channels 2 2
Max memory bandwidth 35.76 GB/s 25.6 GB/s
Max PCIe lanes 12 16
TDP 15 W 84 W
Suggested PSU - 600W ATX Power Supply
GPU integrated graphics AMD Radeon Vega 8 (Picasso) Intel HD Graphics 4600
GPU cores 8 -
GPU execution units - 20
GPU shading units 512 160
GPU base clock 300 MHz 350 MHz
GPU boost clock 1200 MHz 1200 MHz
GPU FP32 floating point 1,229 GFLOPS 352 GFLOPS
Socket FP5 LGA1150
Compatible motherboard - Socket LGA 1150 Motherboard 
Maximum temperature 105°C 72.7°C
CPU-Z single thread 380 415
CPU-Z multi thread 1,465 1,614
PassMark single thread 1,980 2,195
PassMark CPU Mark 6,866 5,576
(Windows 64-bit)
Geekbench 4 single core
2,351 4,279
(Windows 64-bit)
Geekbench 4 multi-core
8,147 12,180
Geekbench 5 single core
571 950
Geekbench 5 multi-core
2,177 3,135
GFLOPS performance
80.9 GFLOPS 241.7 GFLOPS
(Multi-core / watt performance)
Performance / watt ratio
543 pts / W 145 pts / W

We can better compare what are the technical differences between the two processors.

Suggested PSU: We assume that we have An ATX computer case, a high end graphics card, 16GB RAM, a 512GB SSD, a 1TB HDD hard drive, a Blu-Ray drive. We will have to rely on a more powerful power supply if we want to have several graphics cards, several monitors, more memory, etc.

Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.

We see that the two processors have an equivalent number of cores, the turbo frequency of Intel Core i5-4690 is bigger, that the PDT of AMD Ryzen 5 3450U is lower. The AMD Ryzen 5 3450U was designed earlier.

Performance comparison with the benchmarks:

Performance comparison between the two processors, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark software such as Geekbench 4.

CPU-Z - Multi-thread & single thread score
Intel Core i5-4690 415
AMD Ryzen 5 3450U 380

In single core, the difference is 9%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 10%.

CPU-Z is a system information software that provides the name of the processor, its model number, the codename, the cache levels, the package, the process. It can also gives data about the mainboard, the memory. It makes real time measurement, with finally a benchmark for the single thread, as well as for the multi thread.

PassMark - CPU Mark & single thread
AMD Ryzen 5 3450U 1,980
Intel Core i5-4690 2,195

In single core, the difference is -10%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 23%.

PassMark is a benchmarking software that performs several performance tests including prime numbers, integers, floating point, compression, physics, extended instructions, encoding, sorting. The higher the score is, the higher is the device capacity.

On Windows 64-bit:

Geekbench 4 - Multi-core & single core score - Windows 64-bit
Intel Core i5-4690 4,279
AMD Ryzen 5 3450U 2,351

In single core, the difference is 82%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 50%.

Geekbench 4 is a complete benchmark platform with several types of tests, including data compression, images, AES encryption, SQL encoding, HTML, PDF file rendering, matrix computation, Fast Fourier Transform, 3D object simulation, photo editing, memory testing. This allows us to better visualize the respective power of these devices. For each result, we took an average of 250 values on the famous benchmark software.

On Windows:

Geekbench 5 - Multi-core & single core score - Windows
Intel Core i5-4690 950
AMD Ryzen 5 3450U 571

In single core, the difference is 66%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 44%.

On Linux:

Geekbench 5 - Multi-core & single core score - Linux
Intel Core i5-4690 1,020
AMD Ryzen 5 3450U 696

In single core, the difference is 47%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 155%.

Geekbench 5 is a software for measuring the performance of a computer system, for fixed devices, mobile devices, servers. This platform makes it possible to better compare the power of the CPU, the computing power and to compare it with similar or totally different systems. Geekbench 5 includes new workloads that represent work tasks and applications that we can find in reality.


AMD Ryzen 5 3450U Intel equivalentIntel Core i5-4690 AMD equivalent

See also:

Intel Core i5-4690KIntel Core i5-4690S © 2023 - XML sitemap - Information - Privacy policy - Advertising policy - Contact


When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

This page includes affiliate links for which the administrator of GadgetVersus may earn a commission at no extra cost to you should you make a purchase. These links are indicated using the hashtag #ad.


We do not assume any responsibility for the data displayed on our website. Please use at your own risk. Some or all of this data may be out of date or incomplete, please refer to the technical page on the respective manufacturer's website to find the latest up-to-date information regarding the specifics of these products.

Trading System Forex W3Ask W3Ask Brasil W3Ask Deutschland W3Ask España W3Ask France W3Ask Italia W3Ask Nederland