FR
AMD Ryzen 5 3450U vs Intel Core i5-4690
Comparison of the technical characteristics between the processors, with the AMD Ryzen 5 3450U on one side and the Intel Core i5-4690 on the other side. The first is dedicated to the notebook sector, It has 4 cores, 8 threads, a maximum frequency of 3.5GHz. The second is used on the desktop segment, it has a total of 4 cores, 4 threads, its turbo frequency is set to 3.9 GHz. The following table also compares the lithography, the number of transistors (if indicated), the amount of cache memory, the maximum RAM memory capacity, the type of memory accepted, the release date, the maximum number of PCIe lanes, the values obtained in Geekbench 4 and Cinebench R15.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
This page contains references to products from one or more of our advertisers. We may receive compensation when you click on links to those products. For an explanation of our advertising policy, please visit this page.
Specification comparison:
| Processor | AMD Ryzen 5 3450U | Intel Core i5-4690 | ||||||
| Market (main) | Notebook | Desktop | ||||||
| ISA | x86-64 (64 bit) | x86-64 (64 bit) | ||||||
| Microarchitecture | Zen+ | Haswell | ||||||
| Core name | Picasso | Haswell-DT | ||||||
| Family | Ryzen 5 3000 | Core i5-4000 | ||||||
| Part number(s), S-Spec | YM3450C4T4MFG |
BX80646I54690, BXC80646I54690, CM8064601560516, QF4G, SR1QH |
||||||
| Release date | Q4 2020 | Q2 2014 | ||||||
| Lithography | 12 nm | 22 nm | ||||||
| Transistors | - | 1,400,000,000 | ||||||
| Cores | 4 | 4 | ||||||
| Threads | 8 | 4 | ||||||
| Base frequency | 2.1 GHz | 3.5 GHz | ||||||
| Turbo frequency | 3.5 GHz | 3.9 GHz | ||||||
| Cache memory | 4 MB | 6 MB | ||||||
| Max memory capacity | 32 GB | 32 GB | ||||||
| Memory types | DDR4-2400 |
DDR3-1333/1600, DDR3L-1333/1600 |
||||||
| Max # of memory channels | 2 | 2 | ||||||
| Max memory bandwidth | 35.76 GB/s | 25.6 GB/s | ||||||
| Max PCIe lanes | 12 | 16 | ||||||
| TDP | 15 W | 84 W | ||||||
| Suggested PSU | - | 600W ATX Power Supply  |
||||||
| GPU integrated graphics | AMD Radeon Vega 8 (Picasso) | Intel HD Graphics 4600 | ||||||
| GPU cores | 8 | - | ||||||
| GPU execution units | - | 20 | ||||||
| GPU shading units | 512 | 160 | ||||||
| GPU base clock | 300 MHz | 350 MHz | ||||||
| GPU boost clock | 1200 MHz | 1200 MHz | ||||||
| GPU FP32 floating point | 1,229 GFLOPS | 352 GFLOPS | ||||||
| Socket | FP5 | LGA1150 | ||||||
| Compatible motherboard | - | Socket LGA 1150 Motherboard |
||||||
| Maximum temperature | 105°C | 72.7°C | ||||||
| CPU-Z single thread | 380 | 415 | ||||||
| CPU-Z multi thread | 1,465 | 1,614 | ||||||
| PassMark single thread | 1,980 | 2,195 | ||||||
| PassMark CPU Mark | 6,866 | 5,576 | ||||||
| (Windows 64-bit) Geekbench 4 single core | 2,351 | 4,279 | ||||||
| (Windows 64-bit) Geekbench 4 multi-core | 8,147 | 12,180 | ||||||
| (Windows) Geekbench 5 single core | 571 | 950 | ||||||
| (Windows) Geekbench 5 multi-core | 2,177 | 3,135 | ||||||
| (SGEMM) GFLOPS performance | 80.9 GFLOPS | 241.7 GFLOPS | ||||||
| (Multi-core / watt performance) Performance / watt ratio | 543 pts / W | 145 pts / W | ||||||
| Amazon |  |
|
||||||
| eBay |  |
|
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
We can better compare what are the technical differences between the two processors.
Suggested PSU: We assume that we have An ATX computer case, a high end graphics card, 16GB RAM, a 512GB SSD, a 1TB HDD hard drive, a Blu-Ray drive. We will have to rely on a more powerful power supply if we want to have several graphics cards, several monitors, more memory, etc.
Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.
We see that the two processors have an equivalent number of cores, the turbo frequency of Intel Core i5-4690 is bigger, that the PDT of AMD Ryzen 5 3450U is lower. The AMD Ryzen 5 3450U was designed earlier.
Performance comparison with the benchmarks:
Performance comparison between the two processors, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark software such as Geekbench 4.
| CPU-Z - Multi-thread & single thread score | |
|---|---|
| Intel Core i5-4690 |
415 1,614 |
| AMD Ryzen 5 3450U |
380 1,465 |
In single core, the difference is 9%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 10%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
CPU-Z is a system information software that provides the name of the processor, its model number, the codename, the cache levels, the package, the process. It can also gives data about the mainboard, the memory. It makes real time measurement, with finally a benchmark for the single thread, as well as for the multi thread.
| PassMark - CPU Mark & single thread | |
|---|---|
| AMD Ryzen 5 3450U |
1,980 6,866 |
| Intel Core i5-4690 |
2,195 5,576 |
In single core, the difference is -10%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 23%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
PassMark is a benchmarking software that performs several performance tests including prime numbers, integers, floating point, compression, physics, extended instructions, encoding, sorting. The higher the score is, the higher is the device capacity.
On Windows 64-bit:
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-core & single core score - Windows 64-bit | |
|---|---|
| Intel Core i5-4690 |
4,279 12,180 |
| AMD Ryzen 5 3450U |
2,351 8,147 |
In single core, the difference is 82%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 50%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
Geekbench 4 is a complete benchmark platform with several types of tests, including data compression, images, AES encryption, SQL encoding, HTML, PDF file rendering, matrix computation, Fast Fourier Transform, 3D object simulation, photo editing, memory testing. This allows us to better visualize the respective power of these devices. For each result, we took an average of 250 values on the famous benchmark software.
On Windows:
| Geekbench 5 - Multi-core & single core score - Windows | |
|---|---|
| Intel Core i5-4690 |
950 3,135 |
| AMD Ryzen 5 3450U |
571 2,177 |
In single core, the difference is 66%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 44%.
On Linux:
| Geekbench 5 - Multi-core & single core score - Linux | |
|---|---|
| Intel Core i5-4690 |
1,020 3,323 |
| AMD Ryzen 5 3450U |
696 1,302 |
In single core, the difference is 47%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 155%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
Geekbench 5 is a software for measuring the performance of a computer system, for fixed devices, mobile devices, servers. This platform makes it possible to better compare the power of the CPU, the computing power and to compare it with similar or totally different systems. Geekbench 5 includes new workloads that represent work tasks and applications that we can find in reality.
Equivalence:
AMD Ryzen 5 3450U Intel equivalentIntel Core i5-4690 AMD equivalentSee also:
Intel Core i5-4690KIntel Core i5-4690SDisclaimer:
When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
This page includes affiliate links for which the administrator of GadgetVersus may earn a commission at no extra cost to you should you make a purchase. These links are indicated using the hashtag #ad.
Information:
We do not assume any responsibility for the data displayed on our website. Please use at your own risk. Some or all of this data may be out of date or incomplete, please refer to the technical page on the respective manufacturer's website to find the latest up-to-date information regarding the specifics of these products.