AMD Ryzen 5 2600 vs AMD Ryzen 5 3500


AMD Ryzen 5 2600 on Amazon USA
AMD Ryzen 5 3500 on Amazon USA

Comparison of the technical characteristics between the processors, with the AMD Ryzen 5 2600 on one side and the AMD Ryzen 5 3500 on the other side. The first is dedicated to the desktop sector, It has 6 cores, 12 threads, a maximum frequency of 3.9GHz. The second is used on the desktop segment, it has a total of 6 cores, 6 threads, its turbo frequency is set to 4.1 GHz. The following table also compares the lithography, the number of transistors (if indicated), the amount of cache memory, the maximum RAM memory capacity, the type of memory accepted, the release date, the maximum number of PCIe lanes, the values ​​obtained in Geekbench 4 and Cinebench R15.






Specifications:


Processor AMD Ryzen 5 2600 AMD Ryzen 5 3500
Market (main) Desktop Desktop
ISA x86-64 (64 bit) x86-64 (64 bit)
Microarchitecture Zen+ Zen 2
Core name Pinnacle Ridge Matisse
Family Ryzen 5 2000 Ryzen 5 3000
Part number(s), S-Spec YD2600BBM6IAF Ryzen 5 3500
Release date Q2 2018 Q4 2019
Lithography 12 nm 7 nm FinFET
Transistors 4,800,000,000 4,800,000,000
Cores 6 6
Threads 12 6
Base frequency 3.4 GHz 3.6 GHz
Turbo frequency 3.9 GHz 4.1 GHz
Cache memory 16 MB 16 MB
Max memory capacity 64 GB 128 GB
Memory types DDR4-2933 DDR4-3200
Max # of memory channels 2 2
Max memory bandwidth 43.71 GB/s 47.68 GB/s
Max PCIe lanes 20 20
TDP 65 W 65 W
Suggested PSU 600W ATX Power Supply 600W ATX Power Supply
GPU integrated graphics None None
Socket AM4, PGA-1331 AM4
Compatible motherboard Socket AM4 Motherboard  Socket AM4 Motherboard 
Maximum temperature 95°C 95°C
CPU-Z single thread 438 462
CPU-Z multi thread 3,542 2,435
Cinebench R23 single thread 1,022 1,343
Cinebench R23 multi-thread 8,126 7,732
PassMark single thread 2,243 2,516
PassMark CPU Mark 13,215 12,912
(Windows 64-bit)
Geekbench 4 single core
4,441 4,908
(Windows 64-bit)
Geekbench 4 multi-core
20,954 18,543
(SGEMM)
GFLOPS performance
267.1 GFLOPS 464.8 GFLOPS
(Multi-core / watt performance)
Performance / watt ratio
322 pts / W 285 pts / W
Amazon
eBay



We can better compare what are the technical differences between the two processors.

Suggested PSU: We assume that we have An ATX computer case, a high end graphics card, 16GB RAM, a 512GB SSD, a 1TB HDD hard drive, a Blu-Ray drive. We will have to rely on a more powerful power supply if we want to have several graphics cards, several monitors, more memory, etc.

Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.

We see that the two processors have an equivalent number of cores, the turbo frequency of AMD Ryzen 5 3500 is bigger, that their respective TDP are of the same order. The AMD Ryzen 5 3500 was started more recently.

Performances :


Performance comparison between the two processors, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark software such as Geekbench 4.


CPU-Z - Multi-thread & single thread score
AMD Ryzen 5 2600 438
3,542
AMD Ryzen 5 3500 462
2,435


In single core, the difference is -5%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 45%.


CPU-Z is a system information software that provides the name of the processor, its model number, the codename, the cache levels, the package, the process. It can also gives data about the mainboard, the memory. It makes real time measurement, with finally a benchmark for the single thread, as well as for the multi thread.


Cinebench R23 - Multi-thread & single thread score
AMD Ryzen 5 2600 1,022
8,126
AMD Ryzen 5 3500 1,343
7,732


In single core, the difference is -24%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 5%.


Cinebench R23 is cross-platform testing software that allows you to assess the hardware capabilities of a device such as a computer, tablet, server. This version of Cinebench takes into account recent developments in processors with multiple cores and the latest improvements in rendering techniques. The evaluation is ultimately even more relevant. The test scene contains no less than 2,000 objects and more than 300,000 polygons in total.


PassMark - CPU Mark & single thread
AMD Ryzen 5 2600 2,243
13,215
AMD Ryzen 5 3500 2,516
12,912


In single core, the difference is -11%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 2%.


PassMark is a benchmarking software that performs several performance tests including prime numbers, integers, floating point, compression, physics, extended instructions, encoding, sorting. The higher the score is, the higher is the device capacity.





On Windows 64-bit:

Geekbench 4 - Multi-core & single core score - Windows 64-bit
AMD Ryzen 5 2600 4,441
20,954
AMD Ryzen 5 3500 4,908
18,543


In single core, the difference is -10%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 13%.


Geekbench 4 is a complete benchmark platform with several types of tests, including data compression, images, AES encryption, SQL encoding, HTML, PDF file rendering, matrix computation, Fast Fourier Transform, 3D object simulation, photo editing, memory testing. This allows us to better visualize the respective power of these devices. For each result, we took an average of 250 values on the famous benchmark software.


Equivalence:

AMD Ryzen 5 2600 Intel equivalentAMD Ryzen 5 3500 Intel equivalent

See also:

AMD Ryzen 5 2600X

AMD Ryzen 5 3500CAMD Ryzen 5 3500UAMD Ryzen 5 3500X




GadgetVersus.com © 2022 - Information - XML sitemap - Privacy policy - Advertising policy - Contact

Disclaimer:

When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

This page includes affiliate links for which the administrator of GadgetVersus may earn a commission at no extra cost to you should you make a purchase. These links are indicated using the hashtag #ad.


Information:

We do not assume any responsibility for the data displayed on our website. Please use at your own risk. Some or all of this data may be out of date or incomplete, please refer to the technical page on the respective manufacturer's website to find the latest up-to-date information regarding the specifics of these products.


Trading System Forex W3Ask W3Ask Brasil W3Ask Deutschland W3Ask España W3Ask France W3Ask Italia W3Ask Nederland