GadgetVersus Smartphone Processor


AMD Ryzen 5 2500X vs Dual Intel Xeon Platinum 8280


AMD Ryzen 5 2500X on Amazon USA
Dual Intel Xeon Platinum 8280 on Amazon USA

Comparison of the technical characteristics between the processors, with the AMD Ryzen 5 2500X on one side and the Dual Intel Xeon Platinum 8280 on the other side. The first is dedicated to the desktop sector, It has 4 cores, 8 threads, a maximum frequency of 4.0GHz. The second is used on the server segment, it has a total of 28 cores, 56 threads, its turbo frequency is set to 4.0 GHz. The following table also compares the lithography, the number of transistors (if indicated), the amount of cache memory, the maximum RAM memory capacity, the type of memory accepted, the date of first broadcast, the maximum number of PCIe lines, the values ​​obtained in Geekbench 4 and Cinebench R15.






Specifications:


Processor AMD Ryzen 5 2500X Dual Intel Xeon Platinum 8280
Market Desktop Server
Family Zen+ Cascade Lake
Part number(s), S-Spec YD250XBBM4KAF,
YD250XBBAFMPK
CD8069504228001,
SRF9P
Release date Q3 2018 Q2 2019
Lithography 12 nm 14 nm
Transistors 4,800,000,000 -
Cores 4 56
Threads 8 112
Base frequency 3.6 GHz 2.7 GHz
Turbo frequency 4.0 GHz 4.0 GHz
Cache memory 8 MB 77.0 MB
Max memory capacity 64 GB 2 TB
Memory types DDR4-2933 DDR4-2933
Max # of memory channels 2 12
Max memory bandwidth 43.71 GB/s 262.26 GB/s
Max PCIe lanes 20 96
TDP 65 W 410 W
GPU integrated graphics None None
Socket AM4, PGA-1331 LGA 3647
Cinebench R15 single thread 240 90
Cinebench R15 multi-thread 966 7,193
PassMark single thread 2,360 2,210
PassMark CPU Mark 9,690 43,940
(Linux 64-bit)
Geekbench 4 single core
4,731 4,301
(Linux 64-bit)
Geekbench 4 multi-core
12,827 109,442
(SGEMM)
GFLOPS performance
185.7 GFLOPS 3,260 GFLOPS
(Multi-core / watt performance)
Performance / watt ratio
197 pts / W 267 pts / W
Amazon
eBay




We can better compare what are the technical differences between the two processors. The processor Dual Intel Xeon Platinum 8280 has a larger number of cores, they have a similar turbo frequency, that the PDT of AMD Ryzen 5 2500X is lower. The Dual Intel Xeon Platinum 8280 was started more recently.

Performances :


Performance comparison between the two processors, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark software such as Geekbench 4.


Cinebench R15 - Multi-thread & single thread score
Dual Intel Xeon Platinum 8280#ad 90
7,193
AMD Ryzen 5 2500X#ad 240
966


In single core, the difference is 167%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 645%.


Cinebench R15 evaluates the performance of CPU calculations by restoring a photorealistic 3D scene. The scene has 2,000 objects, 300,000 polygons, uses sharp and fuzzy reflections, bright areas, shadows, procedural shaders, antialiasing, and so on. The faster the rendering of the scene is created, the more powerful the PC is, with a high number of points.


PassMark - CPU Mark & single thread
Dual Intel Xeon Platinum 8280#ad 2,210
43,940
AMD Ryzen 5 2500X#ad 2,360
9,690


In single core, the difference is 7%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 353%.


PassMark is a benchmarking software that performs several performance tests including prime numbers, integers, floating point, compression, physics, extended instructions, encoding, sorting. The higher the score is, the higher is the device capacity.


On Windows 64-bit:

Geekbench 4 - Multi-core & single core score - Windows 64-bit
Dual Intel Xeon Platinum 8280#ad 4,576
36,105
AMD Ryzen 5 2500X#ad 4,369
15,008


In single core, the difference is 5%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 141%.

On Linux 64-bit:

Geekbench 4 - Multi-core & single core score - Linux 64-bit
Dual Intel Xeon Platinum 8280#ad 4,301
109,442
AMD Ryzen 5 2500X#ad 4,731
12,827


In single core, the difference is 10%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 753%.


Geekbench 4 is a complete benchmark platform with several types of tests, including data compression, images, AES encryption, SQL encoding, HTML, PDF file rendering, matrix computation, Fast Fourier Transform, 3D object simulation, photo editing, memory testing. This allows us to better visualize the respective power of these devices. For each result, we took an average of 250 values on the famous benchmark software.


Equivalence:

AMD Ryzen 5 2500X Intel equivalentDual Intel Xeon Platinum 8280 AMD equivalent

See also:

AMD Ryzen 5 2500U

Intel Xeon Platinum 8280








GadgetVersus.com © 2020 - Privacy policy - Advertising policy

Disclaimer:

When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

This page includes affiliate links for which the administrator of GadgetVersus may earn a commission at no extra cost to you should you make a purchase. These links are indicated using the hashtag #ad.


Information:

We do not assume any responsibility for the data displayed on our website. Please use at your own risk. Some or all of this data may be out of date or incomplete, please refer to the technical page on the respective manufacturer's website to find the latest up-to-date information regarding the specifics of these products.


Trading System Forex W3Ask W3Ask Brasil W3Ask Deutschland W3Ask España W3Ask France W3Ask Italia W3Ask Nederland