GadgetVersus Smartphone Processor


AMD Ryzen 5 2500X vs Dual Intel Xeon E5-2699 v4


AMD Ryzen 5 2500X on Amazon USA
Dual Intel Xeon E5-2699 v4 on Amazon USA

Comparison of the technical characteristics between the processors, with the AMD Ryzen 5 2500X on one side and the Dual Intel Xeon E5-2699 v4 on the other side. The first is dedicated to the desktop sector, It has 4 cores, 8 threads, a maximum frequency of 4.0GHz. The second is used on the server segment, it has a total of 22 cores, 44 threads, its turbo frequency is set to 3.6 GHz. The following table also compares the lithography, the number of transistors (if indicated), the amount of cache memory, the maximum RAM memory capacity, the type of memory accepted, the date of first broadcast, the maximum number of PCIe lines, the values ​​obtained in Geekbench 4 and Cinebench R15.






Specifications:


Processor AMD Ryzen 5 2500X Dual Intel Xeon E5-2699 v4
Market Desktop Server
Family Zen+ Broadwell
Part number(s), S-Spec YD250XBBM4KAF,
YD250XBBAFMPK
CM8066002022506,
QK10, QK7J, SR2JS
Release date Q3 2018 Q1 2016
Lithography 12 nm 14 nm
Transistors 4,800,000,000 14,400,000,000
Cores 4 44
Threads 8 88
Base frequency 3.6 GHz 2.2 GHz
Turbo frequency 4.0 GHz 3.6 GHz
Cache memory 8 MB 110 MB
Max memory capacity 64 GB 300 GB
Memory types DDR4-2933 DDR4 1600/1866/2133/2400
Max # of memory channels 2 8
Max memory bandwidth 43.71 GB/s 153.6 GB/s
Max PCIe lanes 20 80
TDP 65 W 290 W
GPU integrated graphics None None
Socket AM4, PGA-1331 LGA2011-3
Cinebench R15 single thread 240 140
Cinebench R15 multi-thread 966 5,315
PassMark single thread 2,360 2,040
PassMark CPU Mark 9,690 37,760
(Linux 64-bit)
Geekbench 4 single core
4,731 3,664
(Linux 64-bit)
Geekbench 4 multi-core
12,827 67,269
(SGEMM)
GFLOPS performance
185.7 GFLOPS 1,534.1 GFLOPS
(Multi-core / watt performance)
Performance / watt ratio
197 pts / W 232 pts / W
Amazon
eBay




We can better compare what are the technical differences between the two processors. The processor Dual Intel Xeon E5-2699 v4 has a larger number of cores, the maximum frequency of AMD Ryzen 5 2500X is greater, that the PDT of AMD Ryzen 5 2500X is lower. The AMD Ryzen 5 2500X was designed earlier.

Performances :


Performance comparison between the two processors, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark software such as Geekbench 4.


Cinebench R15 - Multi-thread & single thread score
Dual Intel Xeon E5-2699 v4#ad 140
5,315
AMD Ryzen 5 2500X#ad 240
966


In single core, the difference is 71%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 450%.


Cinebench R15 evaluates the performance of CPU calculations by restoring a photorealistic 3D scene. The scene has 2,000 objects, 300,000 polygons, uses sharp and fuzzy reflections, bright areas, shadows, procedural shaders, antialiasing, and so on. The faster the rendering of the scene is created, the more powerful the PC is, with a high number of points.


PassMark - CPU Mark & single thread
Dual Intel Xeon E5-2699 v4#ad 2,040
37,760
AMD Ryzen 5 2500X#ad 2,360
9,690


In single core, the difference is 16%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 290%.


PassMark is a benchmarking software that performs several performance tests including prime numbers, integers, floating point, compression, physics, extended instructions, encoding, sorting. The higher the score is, the higher is the device capacity.


On Windows 64-bit:

Geekbench 4 - Multi-core & single core score - Windows 64-bit
Dual Intel Xeon E5-2699 v4#ad 3,453
31,453
AMD Ryzen 5 2500X#ad 4,369
15,008


In single core, the difference is 27%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 110%.

On Linux 64-bit:

Geekbench 4 - Multi-core & single core score - Linux 64-bit
Dual Intel Xeon E5-2699 v4#ad 3,664
67,269
AMD Ryzen 5 2500X#ad 4,731
12,827


In single core, the difference is 29%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 424%.


Geekbench 4 is a complete benchmark platform with several types of tests, including data compression, images, AES encryption, SQL encoding, HTML, PDF file rendering, matrix computation, Fast Fourier Transform, 3D object simulation, photo editing, memory testing. This allows us to better visualize the respective power of these devices. For each result, we took an average of 250 values on the famous benchmark software.


Equivalence:

AMD Ryzen 5 2500X Intel equivalentDual Intel Xeon E5-2699 v4 AMD equivalent

See also:

AMD Ryzen 5 2500U

Dual Intel Xeon E5-2699 v3Intel Xeon E5-2699 v3Intel Xeon E5-2699 v4








GadgetVersus.com © 2020 - Privacy policy - Advertising policy

Disclaimer:

When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

This page includes affiliate links for which the administrator of GadgetVersus may earn a commission at no extra cost to you should you make a purchase. These links are indicated using the hashtag #ad.


Information:

We do not assume any responsibility for the data displayed on our website. Please use at your own risk. Some or all of this data may be out of date or incomplete, please refer to the technical page on the respective manufacturer's website to find the latest up-to-date information regarding the specifics of these products.


Trading System Forex W3Ask W3Ask Brasil W3Ask Deutschland W3Ask España W3Ask France W3Ask Italia W3Ask Nederland