GadgetVersus Smartphone Processor


AMD Ryzen 5 2500X vs Dual Intel Xeon E5-2690 v3


AMD Ryzen 5 2500X on Amazon USA
Dual Intel Xeon E5-2690 v3 on Amazon USA

Comparison of the technical characteristics between the processors, with the AMD Ryzen 5 2500X on one side and the Dual Intel Xeon E5-2690 v3 on the other side. The first is dedicated to the desktop sector, It has 4 cores, 8 threads, a maximum frequency of 4.0GHz. The second is used on the server segment, it has a total of 12 cores, 24 threads, its turbo frequency is set to 3.5 GHz. The following table also compares the lithography, the number of transistors (if indicated), the amount of cache memory, the maximum RAM memory capacity, the type of memory accepted, the date of first broadcast, the maximum number of PCIe lines, the values ​​obtained in Geekbench 4 and Cinebench R15.






Specifications:


Processor AMD Ryzen 5 2500X Dual Intel Xeon E5-2690 v3
Market Desktop Server
Family Zen+ Haswell
Part number(s), S-Spec YD250XBBM4KAF,
YD250XBBAFMPK
BX80644E52690V3,
CM8064401439416,
QFRX, QGNY, SR1XN
Release date Q3 2018 Q3 2014
Lithography 12 nm 22 nm
Transistors 4,800,000,000 -
Cores 4 24
Threads 8 48
Base frequency 3.6 GHz 2.6 GHz
Turbo frequency 4.0 GHz 3.5 GHz
Cache memory 8 MB 60 MB
Max memory capacity 64 GB 1,536 GB
Memory types DDR4-2933 DDR4 1600/1866/2133
Max # of memory channels 2 8
Max memory bandwidth 43.71 GB/s 136 GB/s
Max PCIe lanes 20 80
TDP 65 W 270 W
GPU integrated graphics None None
Socket AM4, PGA-1331 LGA2011-3
Cinebench R15 single thread 240 140
Cinebench R15 multi-thread 966 3,413
PassMark single thread 2,360 1,890
PassMark CPU Mark 9,690 26,850
(Linux 64-bit)
Geekbench 4 single core
4,731 3,763
(Linux 64-bit)
Geekbench 4 multi-core
12,827 44,936
(SGEMM)
GFLOPS performance
185.7 GFLOPS 791.6 GFLOPS
(Multi-core / watt performance)
Performance / watt ratio
197 pts / W 166 pts / W
Amazon
eBay




We can better compare what are the technical differences between the two processors. The processor Dual Intel Xeon E5-2690 v3 has a larger number of cores, the maximum frequency of AMD Ryzen 5 2500X is greater, that the PDT of AMD Ryzen 5 2500X is lower. The AMD Ryzen 5 2500X was designed earlier.

Performances :


Performance comparison between the two processors, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark software such as Geekbench 4.


Cinebench R15 - Multi-thread & single thread score
Dual Intel Xeon E5-2690 v3#ad 140
3,413
AMD Ryzen 5 2500X#ad 240
966


In single core, the difference is 71%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 253%.


Cinebench R15 evaluates the performance of CPU calculations by restoring a photorealistic 3D scene. The scene has 2,000 objects, 300,000 polygons, uses sharp and fuzzy reflections, bright areas, shadows, procedural shaders, antialiasing, and so on. The faster the rendering of the scene is created, the more powerful the PC is, with a high number of points.


PassMark - CPU Mark & single thread
Dual Intel Xeon E5-2690 v3#ad 1,890
26,850
AMD Ryzen 5 2500X#ad 2,360
9,690


In single core, the difference is 25%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 177%.


PassMark is a benchmarking software that performs several performance tests including prime numbers, integers, floating point, compression, physics, extended instructions, encoding, sorting. The higher the score is, the higher is the device capacity.


On Windows 64-bit:

Geekbench 4 - Multi-core & single core score - Windows 64-bit
Dual Intel Xeon E5-2690 v3#ad 3,483
37,316
AMD Ryzen 5 2500X#ad 4,369
15,008


In single core, the difference is 25%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 149%.

On Linux 64-bit:

Geekbench 4 - Multi-core & single core score - Linux 64-bit
Dual Intel Xeon E5-2690 v3#ad 3,763
44,936
AMD Ryzen 5 2500X#ad 4,731
12,827


In single core, the difference is 26%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 250%.


Geekbench 4 is a complete benchmark platform with several types of tests, including data compression, images, AES encryption, SQL encoding, HTML, PDF file rendering, matrix computation, Fast Fourier Transform, 3D object simulation, photo editing, memory testing. This allows us to better visualize the respective power of these devices. For each result, we took an average of 250 values on the famous benchmark software.


Equivalence:

AMD Ryzen 5 2500X Intel equivalentDual Intel Xeon E5-2690 v3 AMD equivalent

See also:

AMD Ryzen 5 2500U

Dual Intel Xeon E5-2690 v2Intel Xeon E5-2690 v2Intel Xeon E5-2690 v3








GadgetVersus.com © 2020 - Privacy policy - Advertising policy

Disclaimer:

When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

This page includes affiliate links for which the administrator of GadgetVersus may earn a commission at no extra cost to you should you make a purchase. These links are indicated using the hashtag #ad.


Information:

We do not assume any responsibility for the data displayed on our website. Please use at your own risk. Some or all of this data may be out of date or incomplete, please refer to the technical page on the respective manufacturer's website to find the latest up-to-date information regarding the specifics of these products.


Trading System Forex W3Ask W3Ask Brasil W3Ask Deutschland W3Ask España W3Ask France W3Ask Italia W3Ask Nederland