GadgetVersus Smartphone Processor


AMD Ryzen 5 2500U vs Nvidia Tegra X1 T210


AMD Ryzen 5 2500U on Amazon USA
Nvidia Tegra X1 T210 on Amazon USA

Comparison of the technical characteristics between the processors, with the AMD Ryzen 5 2500U on one side and the Nvidia Tegra X1 T210 on the other side. The first is dedicated to the laptop sector, It has 4 cores, 8 threads, a maximum frequency of 3.6GHz. The second is used on the console segment, it has a total of 8 cores, 8 threads, its turbo frequency is set to 1.9 GHz. The following table also compares the lithography, the number of transistors (if indicated), the amount of cache memory, the maximum RAM memory capacity, the type of memory accepted, the date of first broadcast, the maximum number of PCIe lines, the values ​​obtained in Geekbench 4 and Cinebench R15, as well as an average price.

Specifications:


Processor AMD Ryzen 5 2500U Nvidia Tegra X1 T210
Market Laptop Console
Family Zen Tegra
Part number(s), S-Spec YM2500C4T4MFB Tegra X1 T210, Erista
Release date Q4 2017 Q2 2015
Lithography 14 nm 20 nm
Transistors 4,950,000,000 -
Cores 4 8
Threads 8 8
Base frequency 2.0 GHz 1.3 GHz
Turbo frequency 3.6 GHz 1.9 GHz
Energy cores - 4x ARM Cortex-A72 @ 1.5 GHz
High performance cores - 4x ARM Cortex-A57 @ 1.9 GHz
Cache memory 4 MB 2.5 MB
Max memory capacity 32 GB 8 GB
Memory types DDR4-2400 LPDDR3, LPDDR4
Max # of memory channels 2 2
Max memory bandwidth 35.76 GB/s 25.6 GB/s
TDP 15 W 15 W
GPU integrated graphics AMD Radeon Vega 8 Graphics (Raven) NVIDIA Tegra X1 Maxwell GPU
GPU execution units 8 1
GPU shading units 512 256
GPU base clock rate 300 MHz 1,000 MHz
GPU max clock rate 1100 MHz 1,000 MHz
GPU FP32 floating point 1,126 GFLOPS 512 GFLOPS
(Linux 64-bit | Android 64-bit)
Geekbench 4 single core
3,016 1,158
(Linux 64-bit | Android 64-bit)
Geekbench 4 multi-core
8,517 3,276
(SGEMM)
GFLOPS performance
116.9 GFLOPS 33.6 GFLOPS
(Multi-core / price performance)
Performance / price ratio
15 pts / $ 15 pts / $
(Multi-core / watt performance)
Performance / watt ratio
568 pts / W 218 pts / W
(Multi-core / global cost performance)
Performance / global cost ratio
14 pts / $ 12 pts / $
Note 4 / 5 4.5 / 5
Reviews 448 11,686
Amazon AMD Ryzen 5 2500U Nvidia Tegra X1 T210
(Average)
New price on Amazon
- -
(Average)
Used price on Amazon
- -
eBay AMD Ryzen 5 2500U Nvidia Tegra X1 T210
(Average)
New price on eBay
$550 -
(Average)
Used price on eBay
$370 -


Price: prices can change over time. For technical reasons, they are not updated in real time. This is only an average of the results on the first page of each product, whether new or used. Shipping costs have not been integrated. To know the final price of the product, please go to the form of the shop. If no price is indicated, it means that we did not find any offers during the last update.

We can better compare what are the technical differences between the two processors. The processor Nvidia Tegra X1 T210 has a larger number of cores, the maximum frequency of AMD Ryzen 5 2500U is greater, that their respective TDP are of the same order. The AMD Ryzen 5 2500U was designed earlier.

Ratios: we first consider the average for the new price if available, the average for the used price otherwise. Performance / global cost ratio: This is the ratio of performance on Geekbench 4, divided by the cost of the product + the cost of electricity over 5 years for a duration of use of 13 hours per day.

Performances :


Performance comparison between the two processors, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark software such as Geekbench 4.


On Android 64-bit:

Geekbench 4 - Multi-core & single core score - Android 64-bit
AMD Ryzen 5 2500U 4,236
11,929
Nvidia Tegra X1 T210 1,158
3,276


In single core, the difference is 266%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 264%.

Geekbench 4 is a complete benchmark platform with several types of tests, including data compression, images, AES encryption, SQL encoding, HTML, PDF file rendering, matrix computation, Fast Fourier Transform, 3D object simulation, photo editing, memory testing. This allows us to better visualize the respective power of these devices. For each result, we took an average of 250 values on the famous benchmark software.







GadgetVersus.com © 2020 - Privacy policy
Trading System Forex W3Ask W3Ask Brasil W3Ask Deutschland W3Ask España W3Ask France W3Ask Italia W3Ask Nederland