FR
AMD Ryzen 3 5300U vs Intel Core i3-8109U
Comparison of the technical characteristics between the processors, with the AMD Ryzen 3 5300U on one side and the Intel Core i3-8109U on the other side. The first is dedicated to the thin and light laptop sector, It has 4 cores, 8 threads, a maximum frequency of 3.8GHz. The second is used on the notebook segment, it has a total of 2 cores, 4 threads, its turbo frequency is set to 3.6 GHz. The following table also compares the lithography, the number of transistors (if indicated), the amount of cache memory, the maximum RAM memory capacity, the type of memory accepted, the release date, the maximum number of PCIe lanes, the values obtained in Geekbench 4 and Cinebench R15.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
This page contains references to products from one or more of our advertisers. We may receive compensation when you click on links to those products. For an explanation of our advertising policy, please visit this page.
Specifications:
| Processor | AMD Ryzen 3 5300U | Intel Core i3-8109U | ||||||
| Market (main) | Thin and light laptop | Notebook | ||||||
| ISA | x86-64 (64 bit) | x86-64 (64 bit) | ||||||
| Microarchitecture | Zen 2 | Coffee Lake | ||||||
| Core name | Lucienne | Coffee Lake-U | ||||||
| Family | Ryzen 3 5000 | Core i3-8000 | ||||||
| Part number(s), S-Spec | 100-000000376 | FH8068403419422, FH8068403419433, SRCKC, SRCUT |
||||||
| Release date | Q1 2021 | Q2 2018 | ||||||
| Lithography | 7 nm FinFET | 14 nm+ | ||||||
| Cores | 4 | 2 | ||||||
| Threads | 8 | 4 | ||||||
| Base frequency | 2.6 GHz | 3.0 GHz | ||||||
| Turbo frequency | 3.8 GHz | 3.6 GHz | ||||||
| Cache memory | 4 MB | 4 MB | ||||||
| Max memory capacity | 32 GB | 32 GB | ||||||
| Memory types | DDR4-3200, LPDDR4-4266 | DDR4-2400, LPDDR3-2133 | ||||||
| Max # of memory channels | 4 | 2 | ||||||
| Max memory bandwidth | 68.27 GB/s | 37.5 GB/s | ||||||
| Max PCIe lanes | 12 | 12 | ||||||
| TDP | 15 W | 28 W | ||||||
| Suggested PSU | - | 550W ATX Power Supply  |
||||||
| GPU integrated graphics | AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 | Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 | ||||||
| GPU cores | 6 | - | ||||||
| GPU execution units | - | 48 | ||||||
| GPU shading units | 384 | 384 | ||||||
| GPU base clock | 400 MHz | 300 MHz | ||||||
| GPU boost clock | 1500 MHz | 1050 MHz | ||||||
| GPU FP32 floating point | 1,152 GFLOPS | 806.4 GFLOPS | ||||||
| Socket | FP6, BGA1140 | BGA1528 | ||||||
| Compatible motherboard | - | Socket BGA 1528 Motherboard |
||||||
| Maximum temperature | 105°C | 100°C | ||||||
| Crypto engine | Advanced Encryption Standard | - | ||||||
| Security | Enhanced Virus Protection, Supervisor Mode Access Prevention, Secure Mode Execution Protection |
- | ||||||
| CPU-Z single thread | 464 | 385 | ||||||
| CPU-Z multi thread | 2,621 | 1,027 | ||||||
| Cinebench R15 single thread | 201 | 153 | ||||||
| Cinebench R15 multi-thread | 902 | 382 | ||||||
| Cinebench R20 single thread | 450 | 384 | ||||||
| Cinebench R20 multi-thread | 2,214 | 974 | ||||||
| PassMark single thread | 2,381 | 2,160 | ||||||
| PassMark CPU Mark | 10,028 | 4,347 | ||||||
| (Windows 64-bit) Geekbench 4 single core | 4,163 | 4,284 | ||||||
| (Windows 64-bit) Geekbench 4 multi-core | 12,913 | 8,533 | ||||||
| (Windows) Geekbench 5 single core | 990 | 932 | ||||||
| (Windows) Geekbench 5 multi-core | 3,549 | 2,127 | ||||||
| (SGEMM) GFLOPS performance | 180.7 GFLOPS | 153.7 GFLOPS | ||||||
| (Multi-core / watt performance) Performance / watt ratio | 861 pts / W | 305 pts / W | ||||||
| Amazon |  |
|
||||||
| eBay |  |
|
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
We can better compare what are the technical differences between the two processors.
Suggested PSU: We assume that we have An ATX computer case, a high end graphics card, 16GB RAM, a 512GB SSD, a 1TB HDD hard drive, a Blu-Ray drive. We will have to rely on a more powerful power supply if we want to have several graphics cards, several monitors, more memory, etc.
Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.
The processor AMD Ryzen 3 5300U has more cores, the maximum frequency of AMD Ryzen 3 5300U is greater, that the PDT of AMD Ryzen 3 5300U is lower. The AMD Ryzen 3 5300U was designed earlier.
Performances :
Performance comparison between the two processors, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark software such as Geekbench 4.
| CPU-Z - Multi-thread & single thread score | |
|---|---|
| AMD Ryzen 3 5300U |
464 2,621 |
| Intel Core i3-8109U |
385 1,027 |
In single core, the difference is 21%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 155%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
CPU-Z is a system information software that provides the name of the processor, its model number, the codename, the cache levels, the package, the process. It can also gives data about the mainboard, the memory. It makes real time measurement, with finally a benchmark for the single thread, as well as for the multi thread.
| Cinebench R15 - Multi-thread & single thread score | |
|---|---|
| AMD Ryzen 3 5300U |
201 902 |
| Intel Core i3-8109U |
153 382 |
In single core, the difference is 31%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 136%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
Cinebench R15 evaluates the performance of CPU calculations by restoring a photorealistic 3D scene. The scene has 2,000 objects, 300,000 polygons, uses sharp and fuzzy reflections, bright areas, shadows, procedural shaders, antialiasing, and so on. The faster the rendering of the scene is created, the more powerful the PC is, with a high number of points.
| Cinebench R20 - Multi-thread & single thread score | |
|---|---|
| AMD Ryzen 3 5300U |
450 2,214 |
| Intel Core i3-8109U |
384 974 |
In single core, the difference is 17%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 127%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
Cinebench R20 is a multi-platform test software which allows to evaluate the hardware capacities of a device such as a computer, a tablet, a server. This version of Cinebench takes into account recent developments in processors with multiple cores and the latest improvements in rendering techniques. The evaluation is ultimately even more relevant.
| PassMark - CPU Mark & single thread | |
|---|---|
| AMD Ryzen 3 5300U |
2,381 10,028 |
| Intel Core i3-8109U |
2,160 4,347 |
In single core, the difference is 10%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 131%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
PassMark is a benchmarking software that performs several performance tests including prime numbers, integers, floating point, compression, physics, extended instructions, encoding, sorting. The higher the score is, the higher is the device capacity.
On Windows 64-bit:
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-core & single core score - Windows 64-bit | |
|---|---|
| AMD Ryzen 3 5300U |
4,163 12,913 |
| Intel Core i3-8109U |
4,284 8,533 |
In single core, the difference is -3%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 51%.
On Linux 64-bit:
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-core & single core score - Linux 64-bit | |
|---|---|
| AMD Ryzen 3 5300U |
4,302 14,049 |
| Intel Core i3-8109U |
4,621 9,076 |
In single core, the difference is -7%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 55%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
Geekbench 4 is a complete benchmark platform with several types of tests, including data compression, images, AES encryption, SQL encoding, HTML, PDF file rendering, matrix computation, Fast Fourier Transform, 3D object simulation, photo editing, memory testing. This allows us to better visualize the respective power of these devices. For each result, we took an average of 250 values on the famous benchmark software.
On Windows:
| Geekbench 5 - Multi-core & single core score - Windows | |
|---|---|
| AMD Ryzen 3 5300U |
990 3,549 |
| Intel Core i3-8109U |
932 2,127 |
In single core, the difference is 6%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 67%.
On Linux:
| Geekbench 5 - Multi-core & single core score - Linux | |
|---|---|
| AMD Ryzen 3 5300U |
994 3,433 |
| Intel Core i3-8109U |
971 2,236 |
In single core, the difference is 2%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 54%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
Geekbench 5 is a software for measuring the performance of a computer system, for fixed devices, mobile devices, servers. This platform makes it possible to better compare the power of the CPU, the computing power and to compare it with similar or totally different systems. Geekbench 5 includes new workloads that represent work tasks and applications that we can find in reality.
Equivalence:
AMD Ryzen 3 5300U Intel equivalentIntel Core i3-8109U AMD equivalentSee also:
AMD Ryzen 3 5300GAMD Ryzen 3 5300GEDisclaimer:
When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
This page includes affiliate links for which the administrator of GadgetVersus may earn a commission at no extra cost to you should you make a purchase. These links are indicated using the hashtag #ad.
Information:
We do not assume any responsibility for the data displayed on our website. Please use at your own risk. Some or all of this data may be out of date or incomplete, please refer to the technical page on the respective manufacturer's website to find the latest up-to-date information regarding the specifics of these products.