AMD Ryzen 3 2000 Specs
Specifications of the chips present in the group of processors AMD Ryzen 3 2000. We also look at the respective performance in the benchmarks.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the link above.
This page contains references to products from one or more of our advertisers. We may receive compensation when you click on links to those products. For an explanation of our advertising policy, please
visit this page.
Specifications:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 2200GE #ad |
2018 Q1 |
14 nm |
4 |
4 |
3200 |
3600 |
4000 |
64000 |
8 |
35 |
95 |
|
426 |
1694 |
150 |
572 |
360 |
1430 |
2080 |
6260 |
|
|
3688 |
9005 |
4070 |
10212 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
819 |
2501 |
680 |
1086 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| AMD Ryzen 3 2300X #ad |
2018 Q3 |
12 nm |
4 |
4 |
3500 |
4000 |
8000 |
64000 |
20 |
65 |
95 |
|
478 |
1919 |
234 |
772 |
|
|
2370 |
7870 |
|
|
4316 |
12132 |
4075 |
6658 |
|
|
4642 |
14076 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| AMD Ryzen 3 2300U #ad |
2018 Q1 |
14 nm |
4 |
4 |
2000 |
3400 |
4000 |
32000 |
12 |
15 |
95 |
|
322 |
556 |
80 |
420 |
|
|
1550 |
5170 |
|
|
3073 |
8180 |
3428 |
8736 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| AMD Ryzen 3 2200U #ad |
2018 Q1 |
14 nm |
2 |
4 |
2500 |
3400 |
4000 |
32000 |
12 |
15 |
95 |
|
329 |
1007 |
120 |
310 |
|
|
1750 |
3670 |
|
|
3051 |
5968 |
3314 |
6475 |
3017 |
6345 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| AMD Ryzen 3 2200GE #ad |
2018 Q1 |
14 nm |
4 |
4 |
3200 |
3600 |
4000 |
64000 |
8 |
35 |
95 |
|
417 |
1692 |
150 |
550 |
360 |
1380 |
1970 |
5940 |
|
|
3532 |
9151 |
4302 |
10369 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
737 |
2365 |
887 |
2196 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| AMD Ryzen 3 2200G #ad |
2018 Q1 |
14 nm |
4 |
4 |
3500 |
3700 |
4000 |
64000 |
12 |
65 |
95 |
|
419 |
1694 |
140 |
585 |
|
|
2070 |
6790 |
|
|
3922 |
10594 |
4151 |
9301 |
3451 |
7420 |
4211 |
12142 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
This comparative table allows us to better appreciate the differences between the various processors. The performance for Geekbench 4 single-core and multi-core are established by default on the Windows operating system, also on Linux if available.
Performances:
Parallel display of the respective performance of the various processors for this group of chips. We evaluate the power with the help of several benchmark software if available, such as Cinebench, AnTuTu, PassMark, or Geekbench.
Performance comparison on the CPU-Z benchmark software for IT processors:
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
CPU-Z is a system information software that provides the name of the processor, its model number, the codename, the cache levels, the package, the process. It can also gives data about the mainboard, the memory. It makes real time measurement, with finally a benchmark for the single thread, as well as for the multi thread.
Performance comparison on the Cinebench R15 benchmark platform for IT devices:
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
Cinebench R15 evaluates the performance of CPU calculations by restoring a photorealistic 3D scene. The scene has 2,000 objects, 300,000 polygons, uses sharp and fuzzy reflections, bright areas, shadows, procedural shaders, antialiasing, and so on. The faster the rendering of the scene is created, the more powerful the PC is, with a high number of points.
Performance comparison on the Cinebench R20 benchmark platform for computers:
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
Cinebench R20 is a multi-platform test software which allows to evaluate the hardware capacities of a device such as a computer, a tablet, a server. This version of Cinebench takes into account recent developments in processors with multiple cores and the latest improvements in rendering techniques. The evaluation is ultimately even more relevant.
Performance comparison on the Passmark benchmark platform for processors:
|
PassMark - CPU Mark & single thread |
|
AMD Ryzen 3 2300X#ad |
2,370
7,870 |
|
AMD Ryzen 3 2200G#ad |
2,070
6,790 |
|
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 2200GE#ad |
2,080
6,260 |
|
AMD Ryzen 3 2200GE#ad |
1,970
5,940 |
|
AMD Ryzen 3 2300U#ad |
1,550
5,170 |
|
AMD Ryzen 3 2200U#ad |
1,750
3,670 |
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
PassMark is a benchmarking software that performs several performance tests including prime numbers, integers, floating point, compression, physics, extended instructions, encoding, sorting. The higher the score is, the higher is the device capacity.
On Windows: performance comparison in Geekbench 4 with Windows operating system.
|
Geekbench 4 - Multi-core & single core score - Windows 64-bit |
|
AMD Ryzen 3 2300X#ad |
4,316
12,132 |
|
AMD Ryzen 3 2200G#ad |
3,922
10,594 |
|
AMD Ryzen 3 2200GE#ad |
3,532
9,151 |
|
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 2200GE#ad |
3,688
9,005 |
|
AMD Ryzen 3 2300U#ad |
3,073
8,180 |
|
AMD Ryzen 3 2200U#ad |
3,051
5,968 |
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
On Linux: performance comparison in Geekbench 4 with Linux operating system.
|
Geekbench 4 - Multi-core & single core score - Linux 64-bit |
|
AMD Ryzen 3 2200GE#ad |
4,302
10,369 |
|
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 2200GE#ad |
4,070
10,212 |
|
AMD Ryzen 3 2200G#ad |
4,151
9,301 |
|
AMD Ryzen 3 2300U#ad |
3,428
8,736 |
|
AMD Ryzen 3 2300X#ad |
4,075
6,658 |
|
AMD Ryzen 3 2200U#ad |
3,314
6,475 |
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
On Android: performance comparison in Geekbench 4 with Android operating system.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
On MAC OS X: performance comparison in Geekbench 4 with MAC OS X operating system.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
Geekbench 4 is a complete benchmark platform with several types of tests, including data compression, images, AES encryption, SQL encoding, HTML, PDF file rendering, matrix computation, Fast Fourier Transform, 3D object simulation, photo editing, memory testing. This allows us to better visualize the respective power of these devices. For each result, we took an average of 250 values on the famous benchmark software.
On Windows: performance comparison in Geekbench 5 with Windows operating system.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
On Linux: performance comparison in Geekbench 5 with Linux operating system.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
Geekbench 5 is a software for measuring the performance of a computer system, for fixed devices, mobile devices, servers. This platform makes it possible to better compare the power of the CPU, the computing power and to compare it with similar or totally different systems. Geekbench 5 includes new workloads that represent work tasks and applications that we can find in reality.
List of comparisons:
AllwinnerAMDAMD A10AMD A4AMD A6AMD A8AMD A9AMD AthlonAMD EPYCAMD JaguarAMD OpteronAMD PhenomAMD RyzenAMD Ryzen 1000AMD Ryzen 2000AMD Ryzen 3AMD Ryzen 3 1000AMD Ryzen 3 2000AMD Ryzen 3 3000AMD Ryzen 3 4000AMD Ryzen 3 5000AMD Ryzen 3000AMD Ryzen 4000AMD Ryzen 5AMD Ryzen 5 1000AMD Ryzen 5 2000AMD Ryzen 5 3000AMD Ryzen 5 4000AMD Ryzen 5 5000AMD Ryzen 5000AMD Ryzen 7AMD Ryzen 7 1000AMD Ryzen 7 2000AMD Ryzen 7 3000AMD Ryzen 7 4000AMD Ryzen 7 5000AMD Ryzen 9AMD Ryzen 9 3000AMD Ryzen 9 4000AMD Ryzen 9 5000AMD Ryzen ThreadripperAMD Ryzen Threadripper 1000AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2000AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3000AMD Ryzen Threadripper 5000AMD ZenAMD Zen 2AMD Zen 3AMD Zen+AmlogicAppleARMARM CortexARM Cortex-A17ARM Cortex-A53ARM Cortex-A55ARM Cortex-A57ARM Cortex-A7ARM Cortex-A72ARM Cortex-A73ARM Cortex-A75ARM Cortex-A76ARM Cortex-A8ARM Cortex-A9BroadcomDeca coreDodeca coreDual AMDDual AMD EPYCDual AMD OpteronDual coreDual Intel XeonDual Intel Xeon PlatinumHexa coreHexadeca coreHiSiliconHiSilicon KirinIcosi coreIntelIntel AtomIntel BroadwellIntel Cascade LakeIntel Cascade Lake-XIntel CeleronIntel Coffee LakeIntel Comet LakeIntel CoreIntel Core 10000Intel Core 11000Intel Core 2 DuoIntel Core 2 QuadIntel Core 7000Intel Core 8000Intel Core 9000Intel Core i3Intel Core i3-10000Intel Core i3-11000Intel Core i3-7000Intel Core i3-8000Intel Core i3-9000Intel Core i5Intel Core i5-10000Intel Core i5-11000Intel Core i5-4000Intel Core i5-7000Intel Core i5-8000Intel Core i5-9000Intel Core i7Intel Core i7-10000Intel Core i7-11000Intel Core i7-7000Intel Core i7-8000Intel Core i7-9000Intel Core i9Intel Core i9-10000Intel Core i9-11000Intel Core i9-7000Intel Core i9-8000Intel Core i9-9000Intel Core m3Intel HaswellIntel Ice LakeIntel Ivy BridgeIntel Kaby LakeIntel PentiumIntel Pentium 4Intel Pentium GoldIntel Pentium IIIIntel Rocket LakeIntel Sandy BridgeIntel SkylakeIntel Skylake-XIntel Tiger LakeIntel XeonIntel Xeon E5Intel Xeon GoldIntel Xeon PlatinumIntel Xeon WLGA1150LGA1151MediaTekMediaTek DimensityMicrosoftMono coreNvidiaNvidia TegraOcta coreOcta Intel XeonOctodeca coreQuad coreQuad Intel XeonQualcommQualcomm Kryo 585Qualcomm SnapdragonRockchipSamsungSamsung ExynosSamsung Exynos 7Samsung Exynos 7 OctaSamsung Exynos 9Samsung Exynos 9 OctaTessaradeca coreUnisocProcessors groupsList of benchmarks:
CPU-ZCinebench R15Cinebench R20Geekbench 4 on AndroidGeekbench 4 on LinuxGeekbench 4 on Mac OS XGeekbench 4 on WindowsGeekbench 5 on LinuxGeekbench 5 on WindowsPassMarkGFLOPS performance
FR