AMD Athlon 3000G vs Intel Pentium Silver N6000

AMD Athlon 3000G on Amazon USA
Intel Pentium Silver N6000 on Amazon USA

Comparison of the technical characteristics between the processors, with the AMD Athlon 3000G on one side and the Intel Pentium Silver N6000 on the other side. The first is dedicated to the desktop sector, It has 2 cores, 4 threads, a maximum frequency of 3.5GHz. The second is used on the entry-level notebook segment, it has a total of 4 cores, 4 threads, its turbo frequency is set to 3.3 GHz. The following table also compares the lithography, the number of transistors (if indicated), the amount of cache memory, the maximum RAM memory capacity, the type of memory accepted, the release date, the maximum number of PCIe lanes, the values ​​obtained in Geekbench 4 and Cinebench R15.


Processor AMD Athlon 3000G Intel Pentium Silver N6000
Market (main) Desktop Entry-level notebook
ISA x86-64 (64 bit) x86-64 (64 bit)
Microarchitecture Zen+ Tremont
Core name Picasso Jasper Lake
Family Athlon 3000 Pentium 6000
Part number(s), S-Spec YD3000C6M2OFH,
Pentium Silver N6000
Release date Q4 2019 Q1 2021
Lithography 14 nm 10 nm
Transistors 4,950,000,000 -
Cores 2 4
Threads 4 4
Base frequency 3.5 GHz 1.1 GHz
Turbo frequency - 3.3 GHz
Cache memory 4 MB 4 MB
Max memory capacity 128 GB 16 GB
Memory types DDR4-3200 DDR4, LPDDR4x
Max # of memory channels 2 2
Max PCIe lanes 6 8
TDP 35 W 6 W
Suggested PSU 550W ATX Power Supply -
GPU integrated graphics AMD Radeon Vega 3 (Picasso) Intel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU)
GPU cores 3 -
GPU execution units - 32
GPU shading units 192 256
GPU base clock 300 MHz 350 MHz
GPU boost clock 1100 MHz 850 MHz
GPU FP32 floating point 384 GFLOPS 384 GFLOPS
Socket AM4, PGA-1331 BGA1338
Compatible motherboard Socket AM4 Motherboard  -
Maximum temperature 95°C 105°C
Cinebench R15 single thread 140 138
Cinebench R15 multi-thread 400 367
Cinebench R20 single thread 320 279
Cinebench R20 multi-thread 837 774
PassMark single thread 1,980 1,464
PassMark CPU Mark 4,454 3,816
(Windows 64-bit)
Geekbench 4 single core
4,130 2,882
(Windows 64-bit)
Geekbench 4 multi-core
8,624 6,605
GFLOPS performance
(Multi-core / watt performance)
Performance / watt ratio
246 pts / W 1,101 pts / W

We can better compare what are the technical differences between the two processors.

Suggested PSU: We assume that we have An ATX computer case, a high end graphics card, 16GB RAM, a 512GB SSD, a 1TB HDD hard drive, a Blu-Ray drive. We will have to rely on a more powerful power supply if we want to have several graphics cards, several monitors, more memory, etc.

Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.

The processor Intel Pentium Silver N6000 has a larger number of cores, the maximum frequency of AMD Athlon 3000G is greater, that the thermal dissipation power of Intel Pentium Silver N6000 is less. The Intel Pentium Silver N6000 was started more recently.

Performances :

Performance comparison between the two processors, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark software such as Geekbench 4.

Cinebench R15 - Multi-thread & single thread score
AMD Athlon 3000G 140
Intel Pentium Silver N6000 138

In single core, the difference is 1%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 9%.

Cinebench R15 evaluates the performance of CPU calculations by restoring a photorealistic 3D scene. The scene has 2,000 objects, 300,000 polygons, uses sharp and fuzzy reflections, bright areas, shadows, procedural shaders, antialiasing, and so on. The faster the rendering of the scene is created, the more powerful the PC is, with a high number of points.

Cinebench R20 - Multi-thread & single thread score
AMD Athlon 3000G 320
Intel Pentium Silver N6000 279

In single core, the difference is 15%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 8%.

Cinebench R20 is a multi-platform test software which allows to evaluate the hardware capacities of a device such as a computer, a tablet, a server. This version of Cinebench takes into account recent developments in processors with multiple cores and the latest improvements in rendering techniques. The evaluation is ultimately even more relevant.

PassMark - CPU Mark & single thread
AMD Athlon 3000G 1,980
Intel Pentium Silver N6000 1,464

In single core, the difference is 35%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 17%.

PassMark is a benchmarking software that performs several performance tests including prime numbers, integers, floating point, compression, physics, extended instructions, encoding, sorting. The higher the score is, the higher is the device capacity.

On Windows 64-bit:

Geekbench 4 - Multi-core & single core score - Windows 64-bit
AMD Athlon 3000G 4,130
Intel Pentium Silver N6000 2,882

In single core, the difference is 43%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 31%.

Geekbench 4 is a complete benchmark platform with several types of tests, including data compression, images, AES encryption, SQL encoding, HTML, PDF file rendering, matrix computation, Fast Fourier Transform, 3D object simulation, photo editing, memory testing. This allows us to better visualize the respective power of these devices. For each result, we took an average of 250 values on the famous benchmark software.


AMD Athlon 3000G Intel equivalentIntel Pentium Silver N6000 AMD equivalent © 2022 - Information - XML sitemap - Privacy policy - Advertising policy - Contact


When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

This page includes affiliate links for which the administrator of GadgetVersus may earn a commission at no extra cost to you should you make a purchase. These links are indicated using the hashtag #ad.


We do not assume any responsibility for the data displayed on our website. Please use at your own risk. Some or all of this data may be out of date or incomplete, please refer to the technical page on the respective manufacturer's website to find the latest up-to-date information regarding the specifics of these products.

Trading System Forex W3Ask W3Ask Brasil W3Ask Deutschland W3Ask España W3Ask France W3Ask Italia W3Ask Nederland