Nvidia T1000 4GB vs Nvidia T400 2GB


Nvidia T1000 4GB on Amazon USA
Nvidia T400 2GB on Amazon USA

Comparison of the technical characteristics between the graphics cards, with Nvidia T1000 4GB on one side and Nvidia T400 2GB on the other side, also their respective performances with the benchmarks. The first is dedicated to the desktop sector, it has 896 shading units, a maximum frequency of 1.4 GHz, its lithography is 12 nm. The second is used on the desktop segment, it includes 384 shading units, a maximum frequency of 1.4 GHz, its lithography is 12 nm. The following table also compares the boost clock, the number of shading units (if indicated), of execution units, the amount of cache memory, the maximum memory capacity, the memory bus width, the release date, the number of PCIe lanes, the values ​​obtained in various benchmarks.







Specification comparison:


Graphics card Nvidia T1000 4GB Nvidia T400 2GB
Market (main) Desktop Desktop
Release date Q2 2021 Q2 2021
Model number T1000 4GB,
Quadro T1000 4GB
T400,
Quadro T400
GPU name TU117 TU117
Architecture Turing Turing
Generation Quadro Tx000 Quadro Tx000
Lithography 12 nm 12 nm
Transistors 4,700,000,000 4,700,000,000
Bus interface PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16
GPU base clock 1,065 MHz 420 MHz
GPU boost clock 1,395 MHz 1,425 MHz
Memory frequency 1,250 MHz 1,250 MHz
Effective memory speed 10 Gbps 10 Gbps
Memory size 4 GB 2 GB
Memory type GDDR6 GDDR6
Memory bus 128 bit 64 bit
Memory bandwidth 160.0 GB/s 80.0 GB/s
TDP 50 W 30 W
Suggested PSU250W ATX Power Supply 200W ATX Power Supply
Multicard technology - -
Outputs

4x mini-DisplayPort

3x mini-DisplayPort
Max display resolution

4x 3840 x 2160@120Hz (DP),
4x 5120 x 2880@60Hz (DP),
2x 7680 x 4320@60Hz (DP)

3x 3840 x 2160@120Hz (DP),
3x 5120 x 2880@60Hz (DP)
Video decoding H.264, HEVC, MPEG-4 H.264, HEVC, MPEG-4
Video encoding H.264, HVEC H.264, HEVC
Cores (compute units, SM, SMX) 14 6
Shading units (cuda cores) 896 384
TMUs 56 24
ROPs 32 16
Cache memory 1.0 MB 1.0 MB
Pixel fillrate 44.6 GP/s 22.8 GP/s
Texture fillrate 78.1 GT/s 34.2 GT/s
Performance FP16 (half) 5.0 TFLOPS 2.2 TFLOPS
Performance FP32 (float) 2.5 TFLOPS 1.1 TFLOPS
Performance FP64 (double) 78.1 GFLOPS 34.2 GFLOPS
Amazon
eBay






Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.

We can better compare what are the technical differences between the two graphics cards.


Performance comparison with the benchmarks:


Performance comparison between the two processors, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark software such as Geekbench.


FP32 Performance in GFLOPS
Nvidia T1000 4GB 2,500
Nvidia T400 2GB 1,094


The difference is 129%.


Single-precision floating-point format, also called FP32, is a computer number format that typically occupies 32 bits in PC memory. This represents a wide dynamic range of numeric values that employs a floating point. FP32 power helps assess the video card's capabilities for generating rendering workloads. Video games use INT32 and FP32 cores to manage calculations with integers and numbers with decimals in order to produce maps, bone matrices on which the vertex shaders will calculate the vertices. Values in single precision format are mainly used in video games and 3D software.


Equivalence:

Nvidia T1000 4GB AMD EquivalentNvidia T400 2GB AMD Equivalent




GadgetVersus.com © 2023 - About us - XML sitemap - Privacy policy - Advertising policy - Contact

Disclaimer:

When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

This page includes affiliate links for which the administrator of GadgetVersus may earn a commission at no extra cost to you should you make a purchase. These links are indicated using the hashtag #ad.


Information:

We do not assume any responsibility for the data displayed on our website. Please use at your own risk. Some or all of this data may be out of date or incomplete, please refer to the technical page on the respective manufacturer's website to find the latest up-to-date information regarding the specifics of these products.


W3Ask W3Ask Brasil W3Ask Deutschland W3Ask España W3Ask France W3Ask Italia W3Ask Nederland