Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 vs AMD Radeon PRO Vega 64X


Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 on Amazon USA
AMD Radeon PRO Vega 64X on Amazon USA

Comparison of the technical characteristics between the graphics cards, with Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 on one side and AMD Radeon PRO Vega 64X on the other side, also their respective performances with the benchmarks. The first is dedicated to the desktop sector, it has 16834 shading units, a maximum frequency of 2.5 GHz, its lithography is 5 nm. The second is used on the laptop segment, it includes 4096 shading units, a maximum frequency of 1.5 GHz, its lithography is 14 nm. The following table also compares the boost clock, the number of shading units (if indicated), of execution units, the amount of cache memory, the maximum memory capacity, the memory bus width, the release date, the number of PCIe lanes, the values ​​obtained in various benchmarks.







Specification comparison:


Graphics card Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 AMD Radeon PRO Vega 64X
Market (main) Desktop Laptop
Release date Q3 2022 Q1 2019
Model number AD102-300-A1 215-0894200,
Vega 10 XT
GPU name AD102 Vega 10
Architecture Ada Lovelace GCN 5.0
Generation GeForce 40 Radeon PRO Mac Vega Series
Lithography 5 nm 14 nm
Transistors 76,300,000,000 12,500,000,000
Bus interface PCIe 4.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16
GPU base clock 2,235 MHz 1,250 MHz
GPU boost clock 2,520 MHz 1,468 MHz
Memory frequency 1,325 MHz 1,000 MHz
Effective memory speed 21 Gbps 2 Gbps
Memory size 24 GB 16 GB
Memory type GDDR6X HBM2
Memory bus 384 bit 2048 bit
Memory bandwidth 1,008.0 GB/s 512.0 GB/s
TDP 450 W 250 W
Max display resolution

3840 × 2160@240Hz (DP),
7680 x 4320@60Hz (DP),
7680 x 4320@120Hz (2x DP),
7680 x 4320@60Hz (HDMI)

-
Video decoding H.264, AV1, HEVC -
Video encoding H.264, AV1, HEVC -
Cores (compute units, SM, SMX) 128 64
Shading units (cuda cores) 16,834 4,096
TMUs 512 256
ROPs 176 64
Cache memory 72 MB 4 MB
Pixel fillrate 443.5 GP/s 94.0 GP/s
Texture fillrate 1,290.2 GT/s 375.8 GT/s
Performance FP16 (half) 82.6 TFLOPS 24.1 TFLOPS
Performance FP32 (float) 82.6 TFLOPS 12.0 TFLOPS
Performance FP64 (double) 1.3 TFLOPS 751.6 GFLOPS
Amazon
eBay






Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.

We can better compare what are the technical differences between the two graphics cards.


Performance comparison with the benchmarks:


Performance comparison between the two processors, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark software such as Geekbench.


FP32 Performance in GFLOPS
Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 82,575
AMD Radeon PRO Vega 64X 12,030


The difference is 586%.


Single-precision floating-point format, also called FP32, is a computer number format that typically occupies 32 bits in PC memory. This represents a wide dynamic range of numeric values that employs a floating point. FP32 power helps assess the video card's capabilities for generating rendering workloads. Video games use INT32 and FP32 cores to manage calculations with integers and numbers with decimals in order to produce maps, bone matrices on which the vertex shaders will calculate the vertices. Values in single precision format are mainly used in video games and 3D software.


See also:

Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 DNvidia GeForce RTX 4090 Founders EditionNvidia GeForce RTX 4090 Max-QNvidia GeForce RTX 4090 MobileNvidia GeForce RTX 4090 Ti

AMD Radeon PRO Vega 64

Equivalence:

Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 AMD EquivalentAMD Radeon PRO Vega 64X Nvidia Equivalent




GadgetVersus.com © 2024 - About us - XML sitemap - Privacy policy - Advertising policy - Contact

Disclaimer:

When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

This page includes affiliate links for which the administrator of GadgetVersus may earn a commission at no extra cost to you should you make a purchase. These links are indicated using the hashtag #ad.


Information:

We do not assume any responsibility for the data displayed on our website. Please use at your own risk. Some or all of this data may be out of date or incomplete, please refer to the technical page on the respective manufacturer's website to find the latest up-to-date information regarding the specifics of these products.


W3Ask W3Ask Brasil W3Ask Deutschland W3Ask España W3Ask France W3Ask Italia W3Ask Nederland