Nvidia GeForce RTX 4070 vs Nvidia GeForce RTX 4070 Ti

Nvidia GeForce RTX 4070 on Amazon USA
Nvidia GeForce RTX 4070 Ti on Amazon USA

Comparison of the technical characteristics between the graphics cards, with Nvidia GeForce RTX 4070 on one side and Nvidia GeForce RTX 4070 Ti on the other side, also their respective performances with the benchmarks. The first is dedicated to the desktop sector, it has 5888 shading units, a maximum frequency of 2.5 GHz, its lithography is 5 nm. The second is used on the desktop segment, it includes 7680 shading units, a maximum frequency of 2.6 GHz, its lithography is 5 nm. The following table also compares the boost clock, the number of shading units (if indicated), of execution units, the amount of cache memory, the maximum memory capacity, the memory bus width, the release date, the number of PCIe lanes, the values ​​obtained in various benchmarks.

Specification comparison:

Graphics card Nvidia GeForce RTX 4070 Nvidia GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
Market (main) Desktop Desktop
Release date Q2 2023 Q1 2023
Model number AD104-250-A1 AD104-400-A1
GPU name AD104 AD104
Architecture Ada Lovelace Ada Lovelace
Generation GeForce 40 GeForce 40
Lithography 5 nm 5 nm
Transistors 35,800,000,000 35,800,000,000
Bus interface PCIe 4.0 x16 PCIe 4.0 x16
GPU base clock 1,920 MHz 2,310 MHz
GPU boost clock 2,475 MHz 2,610 MHz
Memory frequency 1,313 MHz 1,313 MHz
Effective memory speed 21 Gbps 21 Gbps
Memory size 12 GB 12 GB
Memory type GDDR6X GDDR6X
Memory bus 192 bit 192 bit
Memory bandwidth 504.2 GB/s 504.2 GB/s
TDP 200 W 285 W
Suggested PSU600W ATX Power Supply 650W ATX Power Supply
Multicard technology - -

3x DisplayPort

3x DisplayPort
Max display resolution

3840 × 2160@240Hz (DP),
7680 x 4320@60Hz (DP),
7680 x 4320@120Hz (2x DP),
7680 x 4320@60Hz (HDMI)

3840 × 2160@240Hz (DP),
7680 x 4320@60Hz (DP),
7680 x 4320@120Hz (2x DP),
7680 x 4320@60Hz (HDMI)
Video decoding H.264, AV1, HEVC H.264, AV1, HEVC
Video encoding H.264, AV1, HEVC H.264, AV1, HEVC
Cores (compute units, SM, SMX) 46 60
Shading units (cuda cores) 5,888 7,680
TMUs 184 240
ROPs 64 80
Tensor cores 184 240
RT cores 46 60
Cache memory 36 MB 48 MB
Pixel fillrate 158.4 GP/s 208.8 GP/s
Texture fillrate 455.4 GT/s 626.4 GT/s
Performance FP16 (half) 29.1 TFLOPS 40.1 TFLOPS
Performance FP32 (float) 29.1 TFLOPS 40.1 TFLOPS
Performance FP64 (double) 455.4 GFLOPS 626.4 GFLOPS

Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.

We can better compare what are the technical differences between the two graphics cards.

Performance comparison with the benchmarks:

Performance comparison between the two processors, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark software such as Geekbench.

FP32 Performance in GFLOPS
Nvidia GeForce RTX 4070 Ti 40,090
Nvidia GeForce RTX 4070 29,146

The difference is 38%.

Single-precision floating-point format, also called FP32, is a computer number format that typically occupies 32 bits in PC memory. This represents a wide dynamic range of numeric values that employs a floating point. FP32 power helps assess the video card's capabilities for generating rendering workloads. Video games use INT32 and FP32 cores to manage calculations with integers and numbers with decimals in order to produce maps, bone matrices on which the vertex shaders will calculate the vertices. Values in single precision format are mainly used in video games and 3D software.

See also:

Nvidia GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Super


Nvidia GeForce RTX 4070 AMD EquivalentNvidia GeForce RTX 4070 Ti AMD Equivalent

GadgetVersus.com © 2024 - About us - XML sitemap - Privacy policy - Advertising policy - Contact


When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

This page includes affiliate links for which the administrator of GadgetVersus may earn a commission at no extra cost to you should you make a purchase. These links are indicated using the hashtag #ad.


We do not assume any responsibility for the data displayed on our website. Please use at your own risk. Some or all of this data may be out of date or incomplete, please refer to the technical page on the respective manufacturer's website to find the latest up-to-date information regarding the specifics of these products.