Nvidia GeForce RTX 4050 vs Nvidia RTX A2000 6GB

Nvidia GeForce RTX 4050 on Amazon USA
Nvidia RTX A2000 6GB on Amazon USA

Comparison of the technical characteristics between the graphics cards, with Nvidia GeForce RTX 4050 on one side and Nvidia RTX A2000 6GB on the other side, also their respective performances with the benchmarks. The first is dedicated to the desktop sector, it has 2560 shading units, a maximum frequency of 2.6 GHz, its lithography is 5 nm. The second is used on the desktop segment, it includes 3328 shading units, a maximum frequency of 1.2 GHz, its lithography is 8 nm. The following table also compares the boost clock, the number of shading units (if indicated), of execution units, the amount of cache memory, the maximum memory capacity, the memory bus width, the release date, the number of PCIe lanes, the values ​​obtained in various benchmarks.

Specification comparison:

Warning: the information concerning Nvidia GeForce RTX 4050 comes in part from rumor-based sources.

Graphics card Nvidia GeForce RTX 4050 Nvidia RTX A2000 6GB
Market (main) Desktop Desktop
Release date Q1 2024 Q3 2021
Model number GeForce RTX 4050 RTX A2000 6GB
GPU name AD107 GA106
Architecture Ada Lovelace Ampere
Generation GeForce 40 Quadro Ampere Ax000
Lithography 5 nm 8 nm
Bus interface PCIe 4.0 x8 PCIe 4.0 x16
GPU base clock 2,505 MHz 562 MHz
GPU boost clock 2,640 MHz 1,200 MHz
Memory frequency 2,250 MHz 1,500 MHz
Effective memory speed 18 Gbps 12 Gbps
Memory size 6 GB 6 GB
Memory type GDDR6 GDDR6
Memory bus 96 bit 192 bit
Memory bandwidth 216.0 GB/s 288.0 GB/s
TDP 150 W 70 W
Suggested PSU500W ATX Power Supply 250W ATX Power Supply
Multicard technology - -

3x DisplayPort

4x mini-DisplayPort
Max display resolution


4096 x 2160@120Hz (4x DP),
5120 x 2880@60Hz (4x DP),
7680 x 4320@60Hz (2x DP)
Video decoding - AV1
Cores (compute units, SM, SMX) 18 26
Shading units (cuda cores) 2,560 3,328
TMUs 80 104
ROPs 32 48
Tensor cores 120 104
RT cores 18 26
Cache memory 32 MB 3 MB
Pixel fillrate 84.5 GP/s 57.6 GP/s
Texture fillrate 211.2 GT/s 124.8 GT/s
Performance FP16 (half) 13.5 TFLOPS 8.0 TFLOPS
Performance FP32 (float) 13.5 TFLOPS 8.0 TFLOPS
Performance FP64 (double) 211.2 GFLOPS 124.8 GFLOPS

Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.

We can better compare what are the technical differences between the two graphics cards.

Performance comparison with the benchmarks:

Performance comparison between the two processors, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark software such as Geekbench.

FP32 Performance in GFLOPS
Nvidia GeForce RTX 4050 13,517
Nvidia RTX A2000 6GB 7,987

The difference is 69%.

Single-precision floating-point format, also called FP32, is a computer number format that typically occupies 32 bits in PC memory. This represents a wide dynamic range of numeric values that employs a floating point. FP32 power helps assess the video card's capabilities for generating rendering workloads. Video games use INT32 and FP32 cores to manage calculations with integers and numbers with decimals in order to produce maps, bone matrices on which the vertex shaders will calculate the vertices. Values in single precision format are mainly used in video games and 3D software.

See also:

Nvidia GeForce RTX 4050 Max-QNvidia GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile


Nvidia GeForce RTX 4050 AMD EquivalentNvidia RTX A2000 6GB AMD Equivalent

GadgetVersus.com © 2024 - About us - XML sitemap - Privacy policy - Advertising policy - Contact


When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

This page includes affiliate links for which the administrator of GadgetVersus may earn a commission at no extra cost to you should you make a purchase. These links are indicated using the hashtag #ad.


We do not assume any responsibility for the data displayed on our website. Please use at your own risk. Some or all of this data may be out of date or incomplete, please refer to the technical page on the respective manufacturer's website to find the latest up-to-date information regarding the specifics of these products.

W3Ask W3Ask Brasil W3Ask Deutschland W3Ask España W3Ask France W3Ask Italia W3Ask Nederland