Nvidia GeForce MX570 vs Intel HD Graphics 505
Comparison of the technical characteristics between the graphics cards, with Nvidia GeForce MX570 on one side and Intel HD Graphics 505 on the other side, also their respective performances with the benchmarks. The first is dedicated to the laptop sector, it has 2048 shading units, a maximum frequency of 1.2 GHz, its lithography is 8 nm. The second is used on the laptop segment, with 18 execution units, it includes 144 shading units, a maximum frequency of 0.8 GHz, its lithography is 14 nm. The following table also compares the boost clock, the number of shading units (if indicated), of execution units, the amount of cache memory, the maximum memory capacity, the memory bus width, the release date, the number of PCIe lanes, the values obtained in various benchmarks.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
This page contains references to products from one or more of our advertisers. We may receive compensation when you click on links to those products. For an explanation of our advertising policy, please
visit this page.
Specification comparison:
Graphics card | |
Nvidia GeForce MX570 |
| | |
Intel HD Graphics 505 |
| |
Market (main) | |
Laptop |
| | |
Laptop |
| |
Release date | |
Q3 2022 |
| | |
Q3 2016 |
| |
Model number | |
GeForce MX570 |
| | |
- |
| |
GPU name | |
GA107S |
| | |
Apollo Lake GT1.5 |
| |
Architecture | |
Ampere |
| | |
Generation 9.0 |
| |
Generation | |
GeForce MX 5xx |
| | |
Apollo Lake Mobile |
| |
Lithography | |
8 nm |
| | |
14 nm |
| |
Bus interface | |
PCIe 4.0 x8 |
| | |
PCIe 3.0 x1 |
| |
GPU base clock | |
1,087 MHz |
| | |
200 MHz |
| |
GPU boost clock | |
1,155 MHz |
| | |
750 MHz |
| |
TDP | |
25 W |
| | |
10 W |
| |
Cores (compute units, SM, SMX) | |
16 |
| | |
- |
| |
Execution units | |
- |
| | |
18 |
| |
Shading units (cuda cores) | |
2,048 |
| | |
144 |
| |
TMUs | |
64 |
| | |
18 |
| |
ROPs | |
40 |
| | |
3 |
| |
Cache memory | |
2 MB |
| | |
- |
| |
Pixel fillrate | |
46.2 GP/s |
| | |
2.4 GP/s |
| |
Texture fillrate | |
73.9 GT/s |
| | |
14.4 GT/s |
| |
Performance FP32 (float) | |
4.7 TFLOPS |
| | |
230.4 GFLOPS |
| |
Performance FP64 (double) | |
73.9 GFLOPS |
| | |
28.8 GFLOPS |
| |
Amazon | |
 |
| | |
 |
| |
eBay | |
 |
| | |
 |
| |
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.
We can better compare what are the technical differences between the two graphics cards.
Performance comparison with the benchmarks:
Performance comparison between the two processors, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark software such as Geekbench.
The difference is 1953%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these graphics cards, you may get different results.
Single-precision floating-point format, also called FP32, is a computer number format that typically occupies 32 bits in PC memory. This represents a wide dynamic range of numeric values that employs a floating point. FP32 power helps assess the video card's capabilities for generating rendering workloads. Video games use INT32 and FP32 cores to manage calculations with integers and numbers with decimals in order to produce maps, bone matrices on which the vertex shaders will calculate the vertices. Values in single precision format are mainly used in video games and 3D software.
Processors with the graphics card Intel HD Graphics 505:
Intel Atom x7-E3950Intel Pentium J4205Intel Pentium N4200Equivalence:
Nvidia GeForce MX570 AMD EquivalentIntel HD Graphics 505 Nvidia EquivalentIntel HD Graphics 505 AMD Equivalent
Disclaimer:
When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
This page includes affiliate links for which the administrator of GadgetVersus may earn a commission at no extra cost to you should you make a purchase. These links are indicated using the hashtag #ad.
Information:
We do not assume any responsibility for the data displayed on our website. Please use at your own risk. Some or all of this data may be out of date or incomplete, please refer to the technical page on the respective manufacturer's website to find the latest up-to-date information regarding the specifics of these products.