Nvidia GeForce MX330 vs Nvidia GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile

Comparison of the technical characteristics between the graphics cards, with Nvidia GeForce MX330 on one side and Nvidia GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile on the other side, also their respective performances with the benchmarks. The first is dedicated to the laptop sector, it has 384 shading units, a maximum frequency of 1.6 GHz, its lithography is 14 nm. The second is used on the laptop segment, it includes 2048 shading units, a maximum frequency of 1.5 GHz, its lithography is 8 nm. The following table also compares the boost clock, the number of shading units (if indicated), of execution units, the amount of cache memory, the maximum memory capacity, the memory bus width, the release date, the number of PCIe lanes, the values ​​obtained in various benchmarks.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.

Specification comparison:

Graphics card		Nvidia GeForce MX330				Nvidia GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
Market (main)		Laptop				Laptop
Release date		Q1 2020				Q1 2022
Model number		GP108-655-A1, N17S-G3-A1				GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
GPU name		GP108				GA107S
Architecture		Pascal				Ampere
Generation		GeForce MX				GeForce 20 Mobile
Lithography		14 nm				8 nm
Bus interface		PCIe 3.0 x4				PCIe 3.0 x16
GPU base clock		1,531 MHz				1,155 MHz
GPU boost clock		1,594 MHz				1,477 MHz
Memory frequency		1,752 MHz				1,750 MHz
Effective memory speed		7 Gbps				14 Gbps
Memory size		2 GB				4 GB
Memory type		GDDR5				GDDR6
Memory bus		64 bit				64 bit
Memory bandwidth		56.1 GB/s				112.0 GB/s
TDP		10 W				45 W
Cores (compute units, SM, SMX)		3				32
Shading units (cuda cores)		384				2,048
TMUs		24				128
ROPs		16				48
Cache memory		512 KB				2 MB
Pixel fillrate		25.5 GP/s				70.9 GP/s
Texture fillrate		38.3 GT/s				189.1 GT/s
Performance FP16 (half)		19.1 GFLOPS				12.1 TFLOPS
Performance FP32 (float)		1.2 TFLOPS				6.1 TFLOPS
Performance FP64 (double)		38.3 GFLOPS				189.1 GFLOPS
Amazon
eBay

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.

Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.

We can better compare what are the technical differences between the two graphics cards.

Performance comparison with the benchmarks:

Performance comparison between the two processors, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark software such as Geekbench.

	FP32 Performance in GFLOPS
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile	6,050
Nvidia GeForce MX330	1,224

The difference is 394%.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these graphics cards, you may get different results.

Single-precision floating-point format, also called FP32, is a computer number format that typically occupies 32 bits in PC memory. This represents a wide dynamic range of numeric values that employs a floating point. FP32 power helps assess the video card's capabilities for generating rendering workloads. Video games use INT32 and FP32 cores to manage calculations with integers and numbers with decimals in order to produce maps, bone matrices on which the vertex shaders will calculate the vertices. Values in single precision format are mainly used in video games and 3D software.

Equivalence:

Nvidia GeForce MX330 AMD EquivalentNvidia GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile AMD Equivalent

GadgetVersus.com © 2023 - About us - XML sitemap - Privacy policy - Advertising policy - Contact

W3Ask W3Ask Brasil W3Ask Deutschland W3Ask España W3Ask France W3Ask Italia W3Ask Nederland