Nvidia GeForce GTX 560M vs Sparkle Arc A580 ORC OC

Nvidia GeForce GTX 560M on Amazon USA
Sparkle Arc A580 ORC OC on Amazon USA

Comparison of the technical characteristics between the graphics cards, with Nvidia GeForce GTX 560M on one side and Sparkle Arc A580 ORC OC on the other side, also their respective performances with the benchmarks. The first is dedicated to the laptop sector, it has 192 shading units, a maximum frequency of 1.6 GHz, its lithography is 40 nm. The second is used on the desktop segment, with 384 execution units, it includes 3072 shading units, a maximum frequency of 2.0 GHz, its lithography is 6 nm. The following table also compares the boost clock, the number of shading units (if indicated), of execution units, the amount of cache memory, the maximum memory capacity, the memory bus width, the release date, the number of PCIe lanes, the values ​​obtained in various benchmarks.

Specification comparison:

Graphics card Nvidia GeForce GTX 560M Sparkle Arc A580 ORC OC
Market (main) Laptop Desktop
Release date Q2 2011 Q4 2023
Model number N12E-GS-A1 ACM-G10, SRLX3,
GPU name GF116 DG2-512
Architecture Fermi 2.0 Xe HPG
Generation GeForce 500 Alchemist Arc 5
Lithography 40 nm 6 nm
Transistors 1,170,000,000 21,700,000,000
Bus interface MXM-B (3.0) PCIe 4.0 x16
GPU base clock 775 MHz 2,000 MHz
GPU boost clock 1,550 MHz 2,000 MHz
Memory frequency 625 MHz 2,000 MHz
Effective memory speed 2.5 Gbps 16 Gbps
Memory size 2 GB 8 GB
Memory type GDDR5 GDDR6
Memory bus 192 bit 256 bit
Memory bandwidth 60.0 GB/s 512.0 GB/s
TDP 75 W 175 W


222 x 101 mm
(8.74 x 3.97 in)
Max display resolution


4096 x 2160@60Hz (HDMI),
7680 x 4320@60Hz (DP)
Video decoding - H.265, H.264, VP9
Cores (compute units, SM, SMX) 4 -
Execution units - 384
Shading units (cuda cores) 192 3,072
TMUs 32 192
ROPs 24 96
Cache memory 384 KB 8 MB
Pixel fillrate 6.2 GP/s 192.0 GP/s
Texture fillrate 24.8 GT/s 384.0 GT/s
Performance FP32 (float) 595.2 GFLOPS 12.3 TFLOPS

Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.

We can better compare what are the technical differences between the two graphics cards.

Performance comparison with the benchmarks:

Performance comparison between the two processors, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark software such as Geekbench.

FP32 Performance in GFLOPS
Sparkle Arc A580 ORC OC 12,288
Nvidia GeForce GTX 560M 595.2

The difference is 1965%.

Single-precision floating-point format, also called FP32, is a computer number format that typically occupies 32 bits in PC memory. This represents a wide dynamic range of numeric values that employs a floating point. FP32 power helps assess the video card's capabilities for generating rendering workloads. Video games use INT32 and FP32 cores to manage calculations with integers and numbers with decimals in order to produce maps, bone matrices on which the vertex shaders will calculate the vertices. Values in single precision format are mainly used in video games and 3D software.

See also:

Nvidia GeForce GTX 560Nvidia GeForce GTX 560 OEMNvidia GeForce GTX 560 SENvidia GeForce GTX 560 TiNvidia GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448Nvidia GeForce GTX 560 Ti OEMNvidia GeForce GTX 560 Ti X2


Nvidia GeForce GTX 560M AMD EquivalentSparkle Arc A580 ORC OC Nvidia EquivalentSparkle Arc A580 ORC OC AMD Equivalent

GadgetVersus.com © 2024 - About us - XML sitemap - Privacy policy - Advertising policy - Contact


When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

This page includes affiliate links for which the administrator of GadgetVersus may earn a commission at no extra cost to you should you make a purchase. These links are indicated using the hashtag #ad.


We do not assume any responsibility for the data displayed on our website. Please use at your own risk. Some or all of this data may be out of date or incomplete, please refer to the technical page on the respective manufacturer's website to find the latest up-to-date information regarding the specifics of these products.