Nvidia A100 PCIe 40GB vs Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090

Comparison of the technical characteristics between the graphics cards, with Nvidia A100 PCIe 40GB on one side and Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 on the other side. The first is dedicated to the desktop sector, it has 6912 shading units, a maximum frequency of 1.4 GHz, its lithography is 7 nm. The second is used on the desktop segment, it includes 16834 shading units, a maximum frequency of 2.5 GHz, its lithography is 5 nm. The following table also compares the boost clock, the number of shading units (if indicated), of execution units, the amount of cache memory, the maximum memory capacity, the memory bus width, the release date, the number of PCIe lanes, the values ​​obtained in various benchmarks.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.

Specification comparison:

Graphics card		Nvidia A100 PCIe 40GB				Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090
Market (main)		Desktop				Desktop
Release date		Q2 2020				Q3 2022
Model number		A100 PCIe, Tesla A100 40GB				AD102-300-A1
GPU name		GA100				AD102
Architecture		Ampere				Ada Lovelace
Generation		Tesla Axx				GeForce 40
Lithography		7 nm				5 nm
Transistors		54,200,000,000				76,300,000,000
Bus interface		PCIe 4.0 x16				PCIe 4.0 x16
GPU base clock		765 MHz				2,235 MHz
GPU boost clock		1,410 MHz				2,520 MHz
Memory frequency		1,215 MHz				1,325 MHz
Effective memory speed		2.4 Gbps				21 Gbps
Memory size		40 GB				24 GB
Memory type		HBM2e				GDDR6X
Memory bus		5120 bit				384 bit
Memory bandwidth		1,555.0 GB/s				1,008.0 GB/s
TDP		250 W				450 W
Suggested PSU		650W ATX Power Supply				850W ATX Power Supply
Multicard technology		NVLink				-
Max display resolution		-				3840 × 2160@240Hz (DP), 7680 x 4320@60Hz (DP), 7680 x 4320@120Hz (2x DP), 7680 x 4320@60Hz (HDMI)
Video decoding		-				H.264, AV1, HEVC
Video encoding		-				H.264, AV1, HEVC
Cores (compute units, SM, SMX)		108				128
Shading units (cuda cores)		6,912				16,834
TMUs		432				512
ROPs		160				176
Tensor cores		432				512
Cache memory		40 MB				72 MB
Pixel fillrate		225.6 GP/s				443.5 GP/s
Texture fillrate		609.1 GT/s				1,290.2 GT/s
Performance FP16 (half)		78.0 TFLOPS				82.6 TFLOPS
Performance FP32 (float)		19.5 TFLOPS				82.6 TFLOPS
Performance FP64 (double)		9.7 TFLOPS				1.3 TFLOPS
Amazon
eBay

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.

Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.

We can better compare what are the technical differences between the two graphics cards.

Performance comparison with the benchmarks:

Performance comparison between the two processors, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark software such as Geekbench.

	FP32 Performance in GFLOPS
Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090	82,575
Nvidia A100 PCIe 40GB	19,492

The difference is 324%.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these graphics cards, you may get different results.

Single precision floating point format, also known as FP32, is a computer number format that typically occupies 32 bits in PC memory. This represents a wide dynamic range of numeric values that employs a floating point.

See also:

Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 Max-QNvidia GeForce RTX 4090 MobileNvidia GeForce RTX 4090 Ti

Equivalence:

Nvidia A100 PCIe 40GB AMD equivalentNvidia GeForce RTX 4090 AMD equivalent

GadgetVersus.com © 2023 - XML sitemap - Information - Privacy policy - Advertising policy - Contact

Trading System Forex W3Ask W3Ask Brasil W3Ask Deutschland W3Ask España W3Ask France W3Ask Italia W3Ask Nederland