Intel Arctic Sound-M vs Intel Arctic Sound 2T


Intel Arctic Sound-M on Amazon USA
Intel Arctic Sound 2T on Amazon USA

Comparison of the technical characteristics between the graphics cards, with Intel Arctic Sound-M on one side and Intel Arctic Sound 2T on the other side. The first is dedicated to the server sector, with 512 execution units, it has 8192 shading units, a maximum frequency of 0.9 GHz, its lithography is 10 nm. The second is used on the desktop segment, with 960 execution units, it includes 15360 shading units, a maximum frequency of 0.9 GHz, its lithography is 10 nm. The following table also compares the boost clock, the number of shading units (if indicated), of execution units, the amount of cache memory, the maximum memory capacity, the memory bus width, the release date, the number of PCIe lanes, the values ​​obtained in various benchmarks.







Specifications:


Graphics card Intel Arctic Sound-M Intel Arctic Sound 2T
Market (main) Server Desktop
Release date Q3 2022 Q4 2021
GPU name Arctic Sound Arctic Sound
Architecture Generation 12.5 Generation 12.5
Generation Xe Graphics Xe Graphics
Lithography 10 nm 10 nm
Transistors 8,000,000,000 8,000,000,000
Bus interface PCIe 4.0 x16 PCIe 4.0 x16
GPU base clock 900 MHz 900 MHz
GPU boost clock 900 MHz 900 MHz
Memory frequency 1,200 MHz 1,200 MHz
Effective memory speed 2.4 GB/s 2.4 GB/s
Memory size 16 GB 32 GB
Memory type HBM2e HBM2e
Memory bus 4096 bit 8192 bit
Memory bandwidth 1,229.0 GB/s 2,458.0 GB/s
TDP 500 W 500 W
Suggested PSU950W ATX Power Supply 900W ATX Power Supply
Execution units 512 960
Shading units 8,192 15,360
TMUs 256 480
ROPs 128 240
Cache memory 8 MB 16 MB
Pixel fillrate 115.2 GP/s 216.0 GP/s
Texture fillrate 230.4 GT/s 432.0 GT/s
Performance FP16 (half) 29.5 TFLOPS 55.3 TFLOPS
Performance FP32 (float) 14.8 TFLOPS 27.6 TFLOPS
Performance FP64 (double) 3.7 TFLOPS 6.9 TFLOPS
Amazon
eBay






Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.

We can better compare what are the technical differences between the two graphics cards.


Performances :


Performance comparison between the two processors, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark software such as Geekbench 4.


FP32 Performance in GFLOPS
Intel Arctic Sound 2T 27,640
Intel Arctic Sound-M 14,750


The difference is 87%.


Single precision floating point format, also known as FP32, is a computer number format that typically occupies 32 bits in PC memory. This represents a wide dynamic range of numeric values that employs a floating point.


Equivalence:

Intel Arctic Sound-M Nvidia equivalentIntel Arctic Sound-M AMD equivalentIntel Arctic Sound 2T Nvidia equivalentIntel Arctic Sound 2T AMD equivalent




GadgetVersus.com © 2022 - Information - XML sitemap - Privacy policy - Advertising policy - Contact

Disclaimer:

When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

This page includes affiliate links for which the administrator of GadgetVersus may earn a commission at no extra cost to you should you make a purchase. These links are indicated using the hashtag #ad.


Information:

We do not assume any responsibility for the data displayed on our website. Please use at your own risk. Some or all of this data may be out of date or incomplete, please refer to the technical page on the respective manufacturer's website to find the latest up-to-date information regarding the specifics of these products.


Trading System Forex W3Ask W3Ask Brasil W3Ask Deutschland W3Ask España W3Ask France W3Ask Italia W3Ask Nederland