Intel Arctic Sound-M vs AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Limited Edition

Intel Arctic Sound-M on Amazon USA
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Limited Edition on Amazon USA

Comparison of the technical characteristics between the graphics cards, with Intel Arctic Sound-M on one side and AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Limited Edition on the other side. The first is dedicated to the server sector, with 512 execution units, it has 8192 shading units, a maximum frequency of 0.9 GHz, its lithography is 10 nm. The second is used on the desktop segment, it includes 4096 shading units, a maximum frequency of 1.5 GHz, its lithography is 14 nm. The following table also compares the boost clock, the number of shading units (if indicated), of execution units, the amount of cache memory, the maximum memory capacity, the memory bus width, the release date, the number of PCIe lanes, the values ​​obtained in various benchmarks.


Graphics card Intel Arctic Sound-M AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Limited Edition
Market (main) Server Desktop
Release date Q3 2022 Q3 2017
Model number - 215-0894200, Vega 10 XT
GPU name Arctic Sound Vega 10
Architecture Generation 12.5 GCN 5.0
Generation Xe Graphics RX Vega
Lithography 10 nm 14 nm
Transistors 8,000,000,000 12,500,000,000
Bus interface PCIe 4.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16
GPU base clock 900 MHz 1.25 GHz
GPU boost clock 900 MHz 1.55 GHz
Memory frequency 1,200 MHz 945 MHz
Effective memory speed 2.4 GB/s 1.9 GB/s
Memory size 16 GB 8 GB
Memory type HBM2e HBM2
Memory bus 4096 bit 2048 bit
Memory bandwidth 1,229.0 GB/s 483.8 GB/s
TDP 500 W 295 W
Suggested PSU950W ATX Power Supply 600W ATX Power Supply
Cores (compute units, SM, SMX) - 64
Execution units 512 -
Shading units 8,192 4,096
TMUs 256 256
ROPs 128 64
Cache memory 8 MB 4 MB
Pixel fillrate 115.2 GP/s 98.9 GP/s
Texture fillrate 230.4 GT/s 395.8 GT/s
Performance FP16 (half) 29.5 TFLOPS 25.3 TFLOPS
Performance FP32 (float) 14.8 TFLOPS 12.7 TFLOPS
Performance FP64 (double) 3.7 TFLOPS 791.6 GFLOPS

Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.

We can better compare what are the technical differences between the two graphics cards.

Performances :

Performance comparison between the two processors, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark software such as Geekbench 4.

FP32 Performance in GFLOPS
Intel Arctic Sound-M 14,750
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Limited Edition 12,660

The difference is 17%.

Single precision floating point format, also known as FP32, is a computer number format that typically occupies 32 bits in PC memory. This represents a wide dynamic range of numeric values that employs a floating point.


Intel Arctic Sound-M Nvidia equivalentIntel Arctic Sound-M AMD equivalentAMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Limited Edition Nvidia equivalent © 2022 - Information - XML sitemap - Privacy policy - Advertising policy - Contact


When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

This page includes affiliate links for which the administrator of GadgetVersus may earn a commission at no extra cost to you should you make a purchase. These links are indicated using the hashtag #ad.


We do not assume any responsibility for the data displayed on our website. Please use at your own risk. Some or all of this data may be out of date or incomplete, please refer to the technical page on the respective manufacturer's website to find the latest up-to-date information regarding the specifics of these products.

Trading System Forex W3Ask W3Ask Brasil W3Ask Deutschland W3Ask España W3Ask France W3Ask Italia W3Ask Nederland