Intel Arc A770 16GB vs Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090

Comparison of the technical characteristics between the graphics cards, with Intel Arc A770 16GB on one side and Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 on the other side. The first is dedicated to the desktop sector, with 512 execution units, it has 4096 shading units, a maximum frequency of 2.4 GHz, its lithography is 6 nm TSMC N6. The second is used on the desktop segment, it includes 16834 shading units, a maximum frequency of 2.5 GHz, its lithography is 4 nm. The following table also compares the boost clock, the number of shading units (if indicated), of execution units, the amount of cache memory, the maximum memory capacity, the memory bus width, the release date, the number of PCIe lanes, the values ​​obtained in various benchmarks.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.

Specification comparison:

Graphics card		Intel Arc A770 16GB				Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090
Market (main)		Desktop				Desktop
Release date		Q3 2022				Q3 2022
Model number		ACM-G10				AD102-300-A1
GPU name		DG2-512				AD102
Architecture		Xe HPG				Ada Lovelace
Generation		Alchemist Arc 7				GeForce 40
Lithography		6 nm TSMC N6				4 nm
Transistors		21,700,000,000				76,300,000,000
Bus interface		PCIe 4.0 x16				PCIe 4.0 x16
GPU base clock		2,100 MHz				2,235 MHz
GPU boost clock		2,400 MHz				2,520 MHz
Memory frequency		2,187 MHz				1,325 MHz
Effective memory speed		17.5 Gbps				21 Gbps
Memory size		16 GB				24 GB
Memory type		GDDR6				GDDR6X
Memory bus		256 bit				384 bit
Memory bandwidth		560.0 GB/s				1,008.0 GB/s
TDP		225 W				450 W
Suggested PSU		600W ATX Power Supply				850W ATX Power Supply
Multicard technology		-				-
Outputs		1x HDMI 3x DisplayPort				1x HDMI 3x DisplayPort
Max display resolution		4096 x 2160@60Hz (HDMI), 7680 x 4320@60Hz (DP)				3840 × 2160@240Hz (DP), 7680 x 4320@60Hz (DP), 7680 x 4320@120Hz (2x DP), 7680 x 4320@60Hz (HDMI)
Video decoding		H.264, H.265, HEVC, AV1, VP9				H.264, AV1, HEVC
Video encoding		H.264, H.265, HEVC, AV1				H.264, AV1, HEVC
Cores (compute units, SM, SMX)		32				128
Execution units		512				-
Shading units (cuda cores)		4,096				16,834
TMUs		256				512
ROPs		128				176
Tensor cores		512				512
RT cores		32				128
Cache memory		16 MB				72 MB
Pixel fillrate		307.2 GP/s				443.5 GP/s
Texture fillrate		614.4 GT/s				1,290.0 GT/s
Performance FP16 (half)		39.3 TFLOPS				82.6 TFLOPS
Performance FP32 (float)		19.7 TFLOPS				82.6 TFLOPS
Amazon
eBay

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.

Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.

We can better compare what are the technical differences between the two graphics cards.

Performance comparison with the benchmarks:

Performance comparison between the two processors, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark software such as Geekbench 4.

	FP32 Performance in GFLOPS
Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090	82,580
Intel Arc A770 16GB	19,660

The difference is 320%.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these graphics cards, you may get different results.

Single precision floating point format, also known as FP32, is a computer number format that typically occupies 32 bits in PC memory. This represents a wide dynamic range of numeric values that employs a floating point.

See also:

Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 Max-QNvidia GeForce RTX 4090 MobileNvidia GeForce RTX 4090 Ti

Equivalence:

Intel Arc A770 16GB Nvidia equivalentIntel Arc A770 16GB AMD equivalentNvidia GeForce RTX 4090 AMD equivalent

GadgetVersus.com © 2023 - XML sitemap - Information - Privacy policy - Advertising policy - Contact

Trading System Forex W3Ask W3Ask Brasil W3Ask Deutschland W3Ask España W3Ask France W3Ask Italia W3Ask Nederland