Intel Arc A770 16GB vs Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090


Intel Arc A770 16GB on Amazon USA
Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 on Amazon USA

Comparison of the technical characteristics between the graphics cards, with Intel Arc A770 16GB on one side and Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 on the other side, also their respective performances with the benchmarks. The first is dedicated to the desktop sector, with 512 execution units, it has 4096 shading units, a maximum frequency of 2.1 GHz, its lithography is 6 nm TSMC N6. The second is used on the desktop segment, it includes 16834 shading units, a maximum frequency of 2.5 GHz, its lithography is 5 nm. The following table also compares the boost clock, the number of shading units (if indicated), of execution units, the amount of cache memory, the maximum memory capacity, the memory bus width, the release date, the number of PCIe lanes, the values ​​obtained in various benchmarks.







Specification comparison:


Graphics card Intel Arc A770 16GB Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090
Market (main) Desktop Desktop
Release date Q3 2022 Q3 2022
Model number ACM-G10 AD102-300-A1
GPU name DG2-512 AD102
Architecture Xe HPG Ada Lovelace
Generation Alchemist Arc 7 GeForce 40
Lithography 6 nm TSMC N6 5 nm
Transistors 21,700,000,000 76,300,000,000
Bus interface PCIe 4.0 x16 PCIe 4.0 x16
GPU base clock 2,100 MHz 2,235 MHz
GPU boost clock 2,100 MHz 2,520 MHz
Memory frequency 2,187 MHz 1,325 MHz
Effective memory speed 17.5 Gbps 21 Gbps
Memory size 16 GB 24 GB
Memory type GDDR6 GDDR6X
Memory bus 256 bit 384 bit
Memory bandwidth 560.0 GB/s 1,008.0 GB/s
TDP 225 W 450 W
Suggested PSU600W ATX Power Supply 850W ATX Power Supply
Multicard technology - -
Outputs

1x HDMI
3x DisplayPort

1x HDMI
3x DisplayPort
Dimensions

269 x 98.4 x 40.8 mm
(10.57 x 3.87 x 1.6 in)

-
Max display resolution

4096 x 2160@60Hz (HDMI),
7680 x 4320@60Hz (DP)

3840 × 2160@240Hz (DP),
7680 x 4320@60Hz (DP),
7680 x 4320@120Hz (2x DP),
7680 x 4320@60Hz (HDMI)
Video decoding H.264, H.265, HEVC, AV1, VP9 H.264, AV1, HEVC
Video encoding H.264, H.265, HEVC, AV1 H.264, AV1, HEVC
Cores (compute units, SM, SMX) 32 128
Execution units 512 -
Shading units (cuda cores) 4,096 16,834
TMUs 256 512
ROPs 128 176
Tensor cores 512 512
RT cores 32 128
Cache memory 16 MB 72 MB
Pixel fillrate 268.8 GP/s 443.5 GP/s
Texture fillrate 537.6 GT/s 1,290.2 GT/s
Performance FP16 (half) 34.4 TFLOPS 82.6 TFLOPS
Performance FP32 (float) 17.2 TFLOPS 82.6 TFLOPS
Amazon
eBay






Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.

We can better compare what are the technical differences between the two graphics cards.


Performance comparison with the benchmarks:


Performance comparison between the two processors, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark software such as Geekbench.


FP32 Performance in GFLOPS
Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 82,575
Intel Arc A770 16GB 17,203


The difference is 380%.


Single-precision floating-point format, also called FP32, is a computer number format that typically occupies 32 bits in PC memory. This represents a wide dynamic range of numeric values that employs a floating point. FP32 power helps assess the video card's capabilities for generating rendering workloads. Video games use INT32 and FP32 cores to manage calculations with integers and numbers with decimals in order to produce maps, bone matrices on which the vertex shaders will calculate the vertices. Values in single precision format are mainly used in video games and 3D software.


See also:

Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 DNvidia GeForce RTX 4090 Founders EditionNvidia GeForce RTX 4090 Max-QNvidia GeForce RTX 4090 MobileNvidia GeForce RTX 4090 Ti

Equivalence:

Intel Arc A770 16GB Nvidia EquivalentIntel Arc A770 16GB AMD EquivalentNvidia GeForce RTX 4090 AMD Equivalent




GadgetVersus.com © 2024 - About us - XML sitemap - Privacy policy - Advertising policy - Contact

Disclaimer:

When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

This page includes affiliate links for which the administrator of GadgetVersus may earn a commission at no extra cost to you should you make a purchase. These links are indicated using the hashtag #ad.


Information:

We do not assume any responsibility for the data displayed on our website. Please use at your own risk. Some or all of this data may be out of date or incomplete, please refer to the technical page on the respective manufacturer's website to find the latest up-to-date information regarding the specifics of these products.