ARM Mali-G57 MC5 vs Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 Ti


ARM Mali-G57 MC5 on Amazon USA
Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 Ti on Amazon USA

Comparison of the technical characteristics between the graphics cards, with ARM Mali-G57 MC5 on one side and Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 Ti on the other side, also their respective performances with the benchmarks. The first is dedicated to the smartphone sector, with 5 execution units, it has 80 shading units, a maximum frequency of 0.9 GHz, its lithography is 16 nm. The second is used on the desktop segment, it includes 18176 shading units, a maximum frequency of 2.6 GHz, its lithography is 5 nm. The following table also compares the boost clock, the number of shading units (if indicated), of execution units, the amount of cache memory, the maximum memory capacity, the memory bus width, the release date, the number of PCIe lanes, the values ​​obtained in various benchmarks.







Specification comparison:


Warning: the information concerning Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 Ti comes in part from rumor-based sources.


Graphics card ARM Mali-G57 MC5 Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 Ti
Market (main) Smartphone Desktop
Release date Q2 2020 Q1 2024
Model number - AD102-400-A1
GPU name Mali-G57 AD102
Architecture Valhall Ada Lovelace
Generation - GeForce 40
Lithography 16 nm 5 nm
Bus interface IGP PCIe 4.0 x16
GPU base clock - 2,355 MHz
GPU boost clock 850 MHz 2,625 MHz
TDP - 600 W
Max display resolution

-

3840 × 2160@240Hz (DP),
7680 x 4320@60Hz (DP),
7680 x 4320@120Hz (2x DP),
7680 x 4320@60Hz (HDMI)
Video decoding - H.264, AV1, HEVC
Video encoding - H.264, AV1, HEVC
Cores (compute units, SM, SMX) - 142
Execution units 5 -
Shading units (cuda cores) 80 18,176
TMUs - 568
ROPs - 192
Cache memory 512 KB 96 MB
Performance FP32 (float) 608 GFLOPS 95.4 TFLOPS
Amazon
eBay






Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.

We can better compare what are the technical differences between the two graphics cards.


Performance comparison with the benchmarks:


Performance comparison between the two processors, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark software such as Geekbench.


FP32 Performance in GFLOPS
Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 Ti 95,424
ARM Mali-G57 MC5 608


The difference is 15595%.


Single-precision floating-point format, also called FP32, is a computer number format that typically occupies 32 bits in PC memory. This represents a wide dynamic range of numeric values that employs a floating point. FP32 power helps assess the video card's capabilities for generating rendering workloads. Video games use INT32 and FP32 cores to manage calculations with integers and numbers with decimals in order to produce maps, bone matrices on which the vertex shaders will calculate the vertices. Values in single precision format are mainly used in video games and 3D software.


Smartphones with the graphics card ARM Mali-G57 MC5:

Vivo S9eXiaomi Redmi 10X 5GXiaomi Redmi 10X Pro 5G

Processors with the graphics card ARM Mali-G57 MC5:

MediaTek MT6873V Dimensity 820 5GMediaTek MT6875 Dimensity 820 5GMediaTek MT6883Z Dimensity 1000CMediaTek MT8192MediaTek MT8195MediaTek MT8195T Kompanio 1380

Equivalence:

ARM Mali-G57 MC5 Nvidia EquivalentARM Mali-G57 MC5 AMD EquivalentNvidia GeForce RTX 4090 Ti AMD Equivalent




GadgetVersus.com © 2024 - About us - XML sitemap - Privacy policy - Advertising policy - Contact

Disclaimer:

When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

This page includes affiliate links for which the administrator of GadgetVersus may earn a commission at no extra cost to you should you make a purchase. These links are indicated using the hashtag #ad.


Information:

We do not assume any responsibility for the data displayed on our website. Please use at your own risk. Some or all of this data may be out of date or incomplete, please refer to the technical page on the respective manufacturer's website to find the latest up-to-date information regarding the specifics of these products.