FR- Home page
-
Graphics card - Comparison
Apple A12Z Bionic GPU vs DMP PICA200
Comparison of the technical characteristics between the graphics cards, with Apple A12Z Bionic GPU on one side and DMP PICA200 on the other side. The first is dedicated to the tablet sector, with 64 execution units, it has 512 shading units, a maximum frequency of 1.3 GHz, its lithography is 7 nm FinFET. The second is used on the console segment, a maximum frequency of 0.3 GHz, its lithography is 65 nm. The following table also compares the boost clock, the number of shading units (if indicated), of execution units, the amount of cache memory, the maximum memory capacity, the memory bus width, the release date, the number of PCIe lanes, the values obtained in various benchmarks.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
This page contains references to products from one or more of our advertisers. We may receive compensation when you click on links to those products. For an explanation of our advertising policy, please visit this page.
Specification comparison:
| Graphics card | Apple A12Z Bionic GPU | DMP PICA200 | ||||||
| Market (main) | Tablet | Console | ||||||
| Release date | Q1 2020 | Q1 2011 | ||||||
| Model number | - | PICA200 | ||||||
| GPU name | Apple Custom GPU | PICA | ||||||
| Architecture | - | MAESTRO-2G | ||||||
| Generation | - | PICA | ||||||
| Lithography | 7 nm FinFET | 65 nm | ||||||
| Bus interface | IGP | IGP | ||||||
| GPU base clock | 1,340 MHz | 268 MHz | ||||||
| GPU boost clock | 1,340 MHz | 268 MHz | ||||||
| TDP | - | 0.4 W | ||||||
| Cores (compute units, SM, SMX) | 8 | 4 | ||||||
| Execution units | 64 | - | ||||||
| Shading units | 512 | - | ||||||
| Performance FP32 (float) | 1.4 TFLOPS | 4.8 GFLOPS | ||||||
| Amazon |  |
|
||||||
| eBay |  |
|
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.
We can better compare what are the technical differences between the two graphics cards.
Performance comparison with the benchmarks:
Performance comparison between the two processors, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark software such as Geekbench.
| FP32 Performance in GFLOPS | |
|---|---|
Apple A12Z Bionic GPU |
1,372.1 |
| DMP PICA200 |
4.8 |
The difference is 28485%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these graphics cards, you may get different results.
average of the performances got with these graphics cards, you may get different results.
Single precision floating point format, also known as FP32, is a computer number format that typically occupies 32 bits in PC memory. This represents a wide dynamic range of numeric values that employs a floating point.
Processors with the graphics card Apple A12Z Bionic GPU:
Apple A12Z BionicEquivalence:
Apple A12Z Bionic GPU Nvidia equivalentApple A12Z Bionic GPU AMD equivalentDMP PICA200 Nvidia equivalentDMP PICA200 AMD equivalentDisclaimer:
When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
This page includes affiliate links for which the administrator of GadgetVersus may earn a commission at no extra cost to you should you make a purchase. These links are indicated using the hashtag #ad.
Information:
We do not assume any responsibility for the data displayed on our website. Please use at your own risk. Some or all of this data may be out of date or incomplete, please refer to the technical page on the respective manufacturer's website to find the latest up-to-date information regarding the specifics of these products.