AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling vs Intel Arc A310

AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling on Amazon USA
Intel Arc A310 on Amazon USA

Comparison of the technical characteristics between the graphics cards, with AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling on one side and Intel Arc A310 on the other side, also their respective performances with the benchmarks. The first is dedicated to the desktop sector, it has 4096 shading units, a maximum frequency of 1.7 GHz, its lithography is 14 nm. The second is used on the desktop segment, with 96 execution units, it includes 768 shading units, a maximum frequency of 2.0 GHz, its lithography is 6 nm TSMC N6. The following table also compares the boost clock, the number of shading units (if indicated), of execution units, the amount of cache memory, the maximum memory capacity, the memory bus width, the release date, the number of PCIe lanes, the values ​​obtained in various benchmarks.

Specification comparison:

Graphics card AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling Intel Arc A310
Market (main) Desktop Desktop
Release date Q3 2017 Q3 2022
Model number Vega 10 XTX ACM-G11
GPU name Vega 10 DG2-128
Architecture GCN 5.0 Xe HPG
Generation RX Vega Alchemist Arc 3
Lithography 14 nm 6 nm TSMC N6
Transistors 12,500,000,000 7,200,000,000
Bus interface PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 4.0 x8
GPU base clock 1,406 MHz 2,000 MHz
GPU boost clock 1,677 MHz 2,000 MHz
Memory frequency 945 MHz 1,937 MHz
Effective memory speed 1.9 Gbps 15.5 Gbps
Memory size 8 GB 4 GB
Memory type HBM2 GDDR6
Memory bus 2048 bit 64 bit
Memory bandwidth 483.8 GB/s 124.0 GB/s
TDP 345 W 75 W
Suggested PSU700W ATX Power Supply 300W ATX Power Supply
Multicard technology - -

3x DisplayPort

4x mini-DisplayPort
Max display resolution


4096 x 2160@60Hz (HDMI),
7680 x 4320@60Hz (DP)
Video decoding - H.264, H.265, HEVC, AV1, VP9
Video encoding - H.264, H.265, HEVC, AV1
Cores (compute units, SM, SMX) 64 6
Execution units - 96
Shading units 4,096 768
TMUs 256 32
ROPs 64 16
Cache memory 4 MB 4 MB
Pixel fillrate 107.3 GP/s 32.0 GP/s
Texture fillrate 429.3 GT/s 64.0 GT/s
Performance FP16 (half) 27.5 TFLOPS 6.1 TFLOPS
Performance FP32 (float) 13.7 TFLOPS 3.1 TFLOPS
Performance FP64 (double) 858.6 GFLOPS 768 GFLOPS

Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.

We can better compare what are the technical differences between the two graphics cards.

Performance comparison with the benchmarks:

Performance comparison between the two processors, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark software such as Geekbench.

FP32 Performance in GFLOPS
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling 13,740
Intel Arc A310 3,072

The difference is 347%.

Single-precision floating-point format, also called FP32, is a computer number format that typically occupies 32 bits in PC memory. This represents a wide dynamic range of numeric values that employs a floating point. FP32 power helps assess the video card's capabilities for generating rendering workloads. Video games use INT32 and FP32 cores to manage calculations with integers and numbers with decimals in order to produce maps, bone matrices on which the vertex shaders will calculate the vertices. Values in single precision format are mainly used in video games and 3D software.


AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling Nvidia EquivalentIntel Arc A310 Nvidia EquivalentIntel Arc A310 AMD Equivalent © 2024 - About us - XML sitemap - Privacy policy - Advertising policy - Contact


When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

This page includes affiliate links for which the administrator of GadgetVersus may earn a commission at no extra cost to you should you make a purchase. These links are indicated using the hashtag #ad.


We do not assume any responsibility for the data displayed on our website. Please use at your own risk. Some or all of this data may be out of date or incomplete, please refer to the technical page on the respective manufacturer's website to find the latest up-to-date information regarding the specifics of these products.