AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling vs ATI Radeon 8500

AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling on Amazon USA
ATI Radeon 8500 on Amazon USA

Comparison of the technical characteristics between the graphics cards, with AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling on one side and ATI Radeon 8500 on the other side. The first is dedicated to the desktop sector, it has 4096 shading units, a maximum frequency of 1.7 GHz, its lithography is 14 nm. The second is used on the desktop segment, it includes 4 shading units, a maximum frequency of 0.3 GHz, its lithography is 150 nm. The following table also compares the boost clock, the number of shading units (if indicated), of execution units, the amount of cache memory, the maximum memory capacity, the memory bus width, the release date, the number of PCIe lanes, the values ​​obtained in various benchmarks.

Specification comparison:

Graphics card AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling ATI Radeon 8500
Market (main) Desktop Desktop
Release date Q3 2017 Q3 2001
Model number Vega 10 XTX 215R7AAGA13H
GPU name Vega 10 R200
Architecture GCN 5.0 Rage 7
Generation RX Vega Radeon R200 8500
Lithography 14 nm 150 nm
Transistors 12,500,000,000 60,000,000
Bus interface PCIe 3.0 x16 AGP 4x
GPU base clock 1,406 MHz 275 MHz
GPU boost clock 1,677 MHz 275 MHz
Memory frequency 945 MHz 275 MHz
Effective memory speed 1.9 Gbps 0.6 Gbps
Memory size 8 GB 64 MB
Memory type HBM2 DDR
Memory bus 2048 bit 128 bit
Memory bandwidth 483.8 GB/s 8.8 GB/s
TDP 345 W 23 W
Suggested PSU700W ATX Power Supply 200W ATX Power Supply
Multicard technology - -

3x DisplayPort

1x DVI
1x VGA
1x S-Video
Cores (compute units, SM, SMX) 64 2
Shading units 4,096 4
TMUs 256 8
ROPs 64 4
Cache memory 4 MB -
Pixel fillrate 107.3 GP/s 1.1 GP/s
Texture fillrate 429.3 GT/s 2.2 GT/s

Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.

We can better compare what are the technical differences between the two graphics cards.

Performance comparison with the benchmarks:

Performance comparison between the two processors, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark software such as Geekbench.

Texture fillrate performance in GTexels/s
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling 429.3
ATI Radeon 8500 2.2

The difference is 19414%.

The term texture fillrate refers to the number of map texture elements (texels) that the GPU is capable of generating per second. This performance is achieved by multiplying the texture mapping units (TMUs) by the clock frequency of the graphics processor unit.


AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling Nvidia equivalentATI Radeon 8500 Nvidia equivalent © 2023 - XML sitemap - Information - Privacy policy - Advertising policy - Contact


When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

This page includes affiliate links for which the administrator of GadgetVersus may earn a commission at no extra cost to you should you make a purchase. These links are indicated using the hashtag #ad.


We do not assume any responsibility for the data displayed on our website. Please use at your own risk. Some or all of this data may be out of date or incomplete, please refer to the technical page on the respective manufacturer's website to find the latest up-to-date information regarding the specifics of these products.

Trading System Forex W3Ask W3Ask Brasil W3Ask Deutschland W3Ask España W3Ask France W3Ask Italia W3Ask Nederland