AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling vs ATI Radeon 8500

Comparison of the technical characteristics between the graphics cards, with AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling on one side and ATI Radeon 8500 on the other side. The first is dedicated to the desktop sector, it has 4096 shading units, a maximum frequency of 1.7 GHz, its lithography is 14 nm. The second is used on the desktop segment, it includes 4 shading units, a maximum frequency of 0.3 GHz, its lithography is 150 nm. The following table also compares the boost clock, the number of shading units (if indicated), of execution units, the amount of cache memory, the maximum memory capacity, the memory bus width, the release date, the number of PCIe lanes, the values ​​obtained in various benchmarks.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.

Specification comparison:

Graphics card		AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling				ATI Radeon 8500
Market (main)		Desktop				Desktop
Release date		Q3 2017				Q3 2001
Model number		Vega 10 XTX				215R7AAGA13H
GPU name		Vega 10				R200
Architecture		GCN 5.0				Rage 7
Generation		RX Vega				Radeon R200 8500
Lithography		14 nm				150 nm
Transistors		12,500,000,000				60,000,000
Bus interface		PCIe 3.0 x16				AGP 4x
GPU base clock		1,406 MHz				275 MHz
GPU boost clock		1,677 MHz				275 MHz
Memory frequency		945 MHz				275 MHz
Effective memory speed		1.9 Gbps				0.6 Gbps
Memory size		8 GB				64 MB
Memory type		HBM2				DDR
Memory bus		2048 bit				128 bit
Memory bandwidth		483.8 GB/s				8.8 GB/s
TDP		345 W				23 W
Suggested PSU		700W ATX Power Supply				200W ATX Power Supply
Multicard technology		-				-
Outputs		1x HDMI 3x DisplayPort				1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
Cores (compute units, SM, SMX)		64				2
Shading units		4,096				4
TMUs		256				8
ROPs		64				4
Cache memory		4 MB				-
Pixel fillrate		107.3 GP/s				1.1 GP/s
Texture fillrate		429.3 GT/s				2.2 GT/s
Amazon
eBay

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.

Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.

We can better compare what are the technical differences between the two graphics cards.

Performance comparison with the benchmarks:

Performance comparison between the two processors, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark software such as Geekbench.

	Texture fillrate performance in GTexels/s
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling	429.3
ATI Radeon 8500	2.2

The difference is 19414%.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these graphics cards, you may get different results.

The term texture fillrate refers to the number of map texture elements (texels) that the GPU is capable of generating per second. This performance is achieved by multiplying the texture mapping units (TMUs) by the clock frequency of the graphics processor unit.

Equivalence:

AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling Nvidia equivalentATI Radeon 8500 Nvidia equivalent

GadgetVersus.com © 2023 - XML sitemap - Information - Privacy policy - Advertising policy - Contact

Trading System Forex W3Ask W3Ask Brasil W3Ask Deutschland W3Ask España W3Ask France W3Ask Italia W3Ask Nederland