AMD Radeon RX 7900M vs Nvidia GeForce RTX 3070 Founders Edition

AMD Radeon RX 7900M on Amazon USA
Nvidia GeForce RTX 3070 Founders Edition on Amazon USA

Comparison of the technical characteristics between the graphics cards, with AMD Radeon RX 7900M on one side and Nvidia GeForce RTX 3070 Founders Edition on the other side, also their respective performances with the benchmarks. The first is dedicated to the laptop sector, it has 4608 shading units, a maximum frequency of 2.1 GHz, its lithography is 5 nm N5. The second is used on the desktop segment, it includes 5888 shading units, a maximum frequency of 1.7 GHz, its lithography is 8 nm. The following table also compares the boost clock, the number of shading units (if indicated), of execution units, the amount of cache memory, the maximum memory capacity, the memory bus width, the release date, the number of PCIe lanes, the values ​​obtained in various benchmarks.

Specification comparison:

Graphics card AMD Radeon RX 7900M Nvidia GeForce RTX 3070 Founders Edition
Market (main) Laptop Desktop
Release date Q4 2023 Q4 2020
Model number Navi 31 GA104-300-A1
GPU name Navi 31, Plum Bonito GA104
Architecture RDNA 3.0 Ampere
Generation Navi Mobile RX 7000M GeForce 30
Lithography 5 nm N5 8 nm
Transistors 57,700,000,000 17,400,000,000
Bus interface PCIe 4.0 x16 PCIe 4.0 x16
GPU base clock 1,825 MHz 1,500 MHz
GPU boost clock 2,090 MHz 1,725 MHz
Memory frequency 2,250 MHz 1,750 MHz
Effective memory speed 18 Gbps 14 Gbps
Memory size 16 GB 8 GB
Memory type GDDR6 GDDR6
Memory bus 256 bit 256 bit
Memory bandwidth 576.0 GB/s 448.0 GB/s
TDP 180 W 220 W
Max display resolution


3840 x 2160@240Hz (DP),
7680 x 4320@60Hz (DP),
7680 x 4320@120Hz (2xDP),
7680 x 4320@60Hz (HDMI)
Cores (compute units, SM, SMX) 72 46
Shading units (cuda cores) 4,608 5,888
TMUs 288 184
ROPs 128 96
RT cores 72 46
Cache memory 64 MB 4 MB
Pixel fillrate 267.5 GP/s 165.6 GP/s
Texture fillrate 601.9 GT/s 317.4 GT/s
Performance FP16 (half) 77.0 TFLOPS 20.3 TFLOPS
Performance FP32 (float) 38.5 TFLOPS 20.3 TFLOPS
Performance FP64 (double) 1.2 TFLOPS 317.4 GFLOPS

Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.

We can better compare what are the technical differences between the two graphics cards.

Performance comparison with the benchmarks:

Performance comparison between the two processors, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark software such as Geekbench.

FP32 Performance in GFLOPS
AMD Radeon RX 7900M 38,523
Nvidia GeForce RTX 3070 Founders Edition 20,314

The difference is 90%.

Single-precision floating-point format, also called FP32, is a computer number format that typically occupies 32 bits in PC memory. This represents a wide dynamic range of numeric values that employs a floating point. FP32 power helps assess the video card's capabilities for generating rendering workloads. Video games use INT32 and FP32 cores to manage calculations with integers and numbers with decimals in order to produce maps, bone matrices on which the vertex shaders will calculate the vertices. Values in single precision format are mainly used in video games and 3D software.

See also:

AMD Radeon RX 7900 GREAMD Radeon RX 7900 XTAMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX


AMD Radeon RX 7900M Nvidia EquivalentNvidia GeForce RTX 3070 Founders Edition AMD Equivalent © 2024 - About us - XML sitemap - Privacy policy - Advertising policy - Contact


When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

This page includes affiliate links for which the administrator of GadgetVersus may earn a commission at no extra cost to you should you make a purchase. These links are indicated using the hashtag #ad.


We do not assume any responsibility for the data displayed on our website. Please use at your own risk. Some or all of this data may be out of date or incomplete, please refer to the technical page on the respective manufacturer's website to find the latest up-to-date information regarding the specifics of these products.