AMD Radeon RX 7800 XT vs Nvidia GeForce GTX 560

AMD Radeon RX 7800 XT on Amazon USA
Nvidia GeForce GTX 560 on Amazon USA

Comparison of the technical characteristics between the graphics cards, with AMD Radeon RX 7800 XT on one side and Nvidia GeForce GTX 560 on the other side, also their respective performances with the benchmarks. The first is dedicated to the desktop sector, it has 3840 shading units, a maximum frequency of 2.4 GHz, its lithography is 5 nm. The second is used on the desktop segment, it includes 336 shading units, a maximum frequency of 0.8 GHz, its lithography is 40 nm. The following table also compares the boost clock, the number of shading units (if indicated), of execution units, the amount of cache memory, the maximum memory capacity, the memory bus width, the release date, the number of PCIe lanes, the values ​​obtained in various benchmarks.

Specification comparison:

Graphics card AMD Radeon RX 7800 XT Nvidia GeForce GTX 560
Market (main) Desktop Desktop
Release date Q3 2023 Q2 2011
Model number Navi 32 XT,
GPU name Navi 32 GF114
Architecture RDNA 3.0 Fermi 2.0
Generation Navi III RX 7000 GeForce 500
Lithography 5 nm 40 nm
Transistors 28,100,000,000 1,950,000,000
Bus interface PCIe 4.0 x16 PCIe 2.0 x16
GPU base clock 1,295 MHz 810 MHz
GPU boost clock 2,430 MHz 810 MHz
Memory frequency 2,425 MHz 1,000 MHz
Effective memory speed 19.4 Gbps 4 Gbps
Memory size 16 GB 1 GB
Memory type GDDR6 GDDR5
Memory bus 256 bit 256 bit
Memory bandwidth 620.8 GB/s 128.0 GB/s
TDP 263 W 150 W
Suggested PSU700W ATX Power Supply 450W ATX Power Supply
Multicard technology - SLI

3x DisplayPort

2x DVI
1x mini-HDMI
Max display resolution

7680 × 4320@60Hz (DP),
3840 x 2160@144Hz (DP),
7680 × 4320@60Hz (HDMI),
3840 x 2160@120Hz (HDMI)

Video decoding H.265, HEVC, H.264 4K -
Video encoding H.265, HEVC, H.264 4K -
Cores (compute units, SM, SMX) 60 7
Shading units (cuda cores) 3,840 336
TMUs 240 56
ROPs 96 32
Cache memory 64 MB 512 KB
Pixel fillrate 233.3 GP/s 11.3 GP/s
Texture fillrate 583.2 GT/s 45.4 GT/s
Performance FP32 (float) 37.3 TFLOPS 1.1 TFLOPS
Performance FP64 (double) 1.2 TFLOPS 90.7 GFLOPS

Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.

We can better compare what are the technical differences between the two graphics cards.

Performance comparison with the benchmarks:

Performance comparison between the two processors, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark software such as Geekbench.

FP32 Performance in GFLOPS
AMD Radeon RX 7800 XT 37,325
Nvidia GeForce GTX 560 1,089

The difference is 3327%.

Single-precision floating-point format, also called FP32, is a computer number format that typically occupies 32 bits in PC memory. This represents a wide dynamic range of numeric values that employs a floating point. FP32 power helps assess the video card's capabilities for generating rendering workloads. Video games use INT32 and FP32 cores to manage calculations with integers and numbers with decimals in order to produce maps, bone matrices on which the vertex shaders will calculate the vertices. Values in single precision format are mainly used in video games and 3D software.

See also:

Nvidia GeForce GTX 560 OEMNvidia GeForce GTX 560 SENvidia GeForce GTX 560 TiNvidia GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448Nvidia GeForce GTX 560 Ti OEMNvidia GeForce GTX 560 Ti X2Nvidia GeForce GTX 560M


AMD Radeon RX 7800 XT Nvidia EquivalentNvidia GeForce GTX 560 AMD Equivalent © 2024 - About us - XML sitemap - Privacy policy - Advertising policy - Contact


When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

This page includes affiliate links for which the administrator of GadgetVersus may earn a commission at no extra cost to you should you make a purchase. These links are indicated using the hashtag #ad.


We do not assume any responsibility for the data displayed on our website. Please use at your own risk. Some or all of this data may be out of date or incomplete, please refer to the technical page on the respective manufacturer's website to find the latest up-to-date information regarding the specifics of these products.

W3Ask W3Ask Brasil W3Ask Deutschland W3Ask España W3Ask France W3Ask Italia W3Ask Nederland