AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT vs Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660


AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT on Amazon USA
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660 on Amazon USA

Comparison of the technical characteristics between the graphics cards, with AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT on one side and Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660 on the other side, also their respective performances with the benchmarks. The first is dedicated to the desktop sector, it has 3456 shading units, a maximum frequency of 2.5 GHz, its lithography is 5 nm. The second is used on the desktop segment, it includes 1408 shading units, a maximum frequency of 1.8 GHz, its lithography is 12 nm. The following table also compares the boost clock, the number of shading units (if indicated), of execution units, the amount of cache memory, the maximum memory capacity, the memory bus width, the release date, the number of PCIe lanes, the values ​​obtained in various benchmarks.







Specification comparison:


Graphics card AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660
Market (main) Desktop Desktop
Release date Q3 2023 Q1 2019
Model number Navi 32 XL,
215-180000076
TU116-300-A1
GPU name Navi 32 TU116
Architecture RDNA 3.0 Turing
Generation Navi III RX 7000 GeForce 16
Lithography 5 nm 12 nm
Transistors 28,100,000,000 6,600,000,000
Bus interface PCIe 4.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16
GPU base clock 1,700 MHz 1,530 MHz
GPU boost clock 2,544 MHz 1,785 MHz
Memory frequency 2,250 MHz 2,001 MHz
Effective memory speed 18 Gbps 8 Gbps
Memory size 12 GB 6 GB
Memory type GDDR6 GDDR5
Memory bus 192 bit 192 bit
Memory bandwidth 432.0 GB/s 192.1 GB/s
TDP 245 W 120 W
Suggested PSU700W ATX Power Supply 450W ATX Power Supply
Multicard technology - -
Outputs

1x HDMI
2x DisplayPort
1x USB Type-C

1x DVI
1x HDMI
1x DisplayPort
Max display resolution

7680 × 4320@60Hz (DP),
3840 x 2160@144Hz (DP),
7680 × 4320@60Hz (HDMI),
3840 x 2160@120Hz (HDMI)

7680 x 4320@60Hz (DP),
7680 x 4320@120Hz (2x DP),
3840 x 2160@240Hz (DP)
Video decoding H.265, HEVC, H.264 4K -
Video encoding H.265, HEVC, H.264 4K -
Cores (compute units, SM, SMX) 54 22
Shading units (cuda cores) 3,456 1,408
TMUs 216 88
ROPs 96 48
Cache memory 48 MB 1.5 MB
Pixel fillrate 244.2 GP/s 85.7 GP/s
Texture fillrate 549.5 GT/s 157.1 GT/s
Performance FP16 (half) 70.3 TFLOPS 10.1 TFLOPS
Performance FP32 (float) 35.2 TFLOPS 5.0 TFLOPS
Performance FP64 (double) 1.1 TFLOPS 157.1 GFLOPS
Amazon
eBay






Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.

We can better compare what are the technical differences between the two graphics cards.


Performance comparison with the benchmarks:


Performance comparison between the two processors, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark software such as Geekbench.


FP32 Performance in GFLOPS
AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT 35,168
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660 5,027


The difference is 600%.


Single precision floating point format, also known as FP32, is a computer number format that typically occupies 32 bits in PC memory. This represents a wide dynamic range of numeric values that employs a floating point.


See also:

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660 MobileNvidia GeForce GTX 1660 SuperNvidia GeForce GTX 1660 TiNvidia GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-QNvidia GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile

Equivalence:

AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT Nvidia EquivalentNvidia GeForce GTX 1660 AMD Equivalent




GadgetVersus.com © 2023 - Information - XML sitemap - Privacy policy - Advertising policy - Contact

Disclaimer:

When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

This page includes affiliate links for which the administrator of GadgetVersus may earn a commission at no extra cost to you should you make a purchase. These links are indicated using the hashtag #ad.


Information:

We do not assume any responsibility for the data displayed on our website. Please use at your own risk. Some or all of this data may be out of date or incomplete, please refer to the technical page on the respective manufacturer's website to find the latest up-to-date information regarding the specifics of these products.


W3Ask W3Ask Brasil W3Ask Deutschland W3Ask España W3Ask France W3Ask Italia W3Ask Nederland