AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT vs Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 TU106

Comparison of the technical characteristics between the graphics cards, with AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT on one side and Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 TU106 on the other side, also their respective performances with the benchmarks. The first is dedicated to the desktop sector, it has 3456 shading units, a maximum frequency of 2.5 GHz, its lithography is 5 nm. The second is used on the desktop segment, it includes 896 shading units, a maximum frequency of 1.6 GHz, its lithography is 12 nm. The following table also compares the boost clock, the number of shading units (if indicated), of execution units, the amount of cache memory, the maximum memory capacity, the memory bus width, the release date, the number of PCIe lanes, the values ​​obtained in various benchmarks.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.

Specification comparison:

Graphics card		AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT				Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 TU106
Market (main)		Desktop				Desktop
Release date		Q3 2023				Q2 2020
Model number		Navi 32 XL, 215-180000076				TU106-125-A1
GPU name		Navi 32				TU106
Architecture		RDNA 3.0				Turing
Generation		Navi III RX 7000				GeForce 16
Lithography		5 nm				12 nm
Transistors		28,100,000,000				10,800,000,000
Bus interface		PCIe 4.0 x16				PCIe 3.0 x16
GPU base clock		1,700 MHz				1,410 MHz
GPU boost clock		2,544 MHz				1,590 MHz
Memory frequency		2,250 MHz				1,500 MHz
Effective memory speed		18 Gbps				12 Gbps
Memory size		12 GB				4 GB
Memory type		GDDR6				GDDR6
Memory bus		192 bit				128 bit
Memory bandwidth		432.0 GB/s				192.0 GB/s
TDP		245 W				90 W
Suggested PSU		700W ATX Power Supply				350W ATX Power Supply
Multicard technology		-				-
Outputs		1x HDMI 2x DisplayPort 1x USB Type-C				1x DVI 1x HDMI 1x DisplayPort
Max display resolution		7680 × 4320@60Hz (DP), 3840 x 2160@144Hz (DP), 7680 × 4320@60Hz (HDMI), 3840 x 2160@120Hz (HDMI)				7680 x 4320@60Hz (DP), 7680 x 4320@120Hz (2x DP), 3840 x 2160@240Hz (DP)
Video decoding		H.265, HEVC, H.264 4K				-
Video encoding		H.265, HEVC, H.264 4K				-
Cores (compute units, SM, SMX)		54				14
Shading units (cuda cores)		3,456				896
TMUs		216				56
ROPs		96				32
RT cores		54				14
Cache memory		48 MB				1 MB
Pixel fillrate		244.2 GP/s				50.9 GP/s
Texture fillrate		549.5 GT/s				89.0 GT/s
Performance FP16 (half)		70.3 TFLOPS				5.7 TFLOPS
Performance FP32 (float)		35.2 TFLOPS				2.8 TFLOPS
Performance FP64 (double)		1.1 TFLOPS				89.0 GFLOPS
Amazon
eBay

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.

Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.

We can better compare what are the technical differences between the two graphics cards.

Performance comparison with the benchmarks:

Performance comparison between the two processors, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark software such as Geekbench.

	FP32 Performance in GFLOPS
AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT	35,168
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 TU106	2,849

The difference is 1134%.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these graphics cards, you may get different results.

Single precision floating point format, also known as FP32, is a computer number format that typically occupies 32 bits in PC memory. This represents a wide dynamic range of numeric values that employs a floating point.

Equivalence:

AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT Nvidia EquivalentNvidia GeForce GTX 1650 TU106 AMD Equivalent

GadgetVersus.com © 2023 - Information - XML sitemap - Privacy policy - Advertising policy - Contact

W3Ask W3Ask Brasil W3Ask Deutschland W3Ask España W3Ask France W3Ask Italia W3Ask Nederland