AMD Radeon RX 7700 vs Intel Arc A550M


AMD Radeon RX 7700 on Amazon USA
Intel Arc A550M on Amazon USA

Comparison of the technical characteristics between the graphics cards, with AMD Radeon RX 7700 on one side and Intel Arc A550M on the other side, also their respective performances with the benchmarks. The first is dedicated to the desktop sector, it has 3072 shading units, a maximum frequency of 2.6 GHz, its lithography is 5 nm. The second is used on the desktop segment, with 256 execution units, it includes 2048 shading units, a maximum frequency of 0.9 GHz, its lithography is 6 nm TSMC N6. The following table also compares the boost clock, the number of shading units (if indicated), of execution units, the amount of cache memory, the maximum memory capacity, the memory bus width, the release date, the number of PCIe lanes, the values ​​obtained in various benchmarks.







Specification comparison:


Warning: the information concerning AMD Radeon RX 7700 comes in part from rumor-based sources.


Graphics card AMD Radeon RX 7700 Intel Arc A550M
Market (main) Desktop Desktop
Release date Q3 2024 Q2 2022
Model number Wheat Nas ACM-G10
GPU name Navi 32 DG2-512
Architecture RDNA 3.0 Xe HPG
Generation Navi III RX 7000 Alchemist Arc 5 Mobile
Lithography 5 nm 6 nm TSMC N6
Bus interface PCIe 4.0 x16 PCIe 4.0 x16
GPU base clock 1,900 MHz 900 MHz
GPU boost clock 2,600 MHz 900 MHz
Memory frequency 2,250 MHz 1,750 MHz
Effective memory speed 18 Gbps 14 Gbps
Memory size 12 GB 8 GB
Memory type GDDR6 GDDR6
Memory bus 192 bit 128 bit
Memory bandwidth 432.0 GB/s 224.0 GB/s
TDP 200 W 60 W
Multicard technology - -
Max display resolution

7680 × 4320@60Hz (DP),
3840 x 2160@144Hz (DP),
7680 × 4320@60Hz (HDMI),
3840 x 2160@120Hz (HDMI)

4096 x 2160@60Hz (HDMI),
7680 x 4320@60Hz (DP),
5120 x 2880@60Hz (eDP)
Video decoding H.265, HEVC, H.264 4K H.264, H.265, HEVC, AV1, VP9
Video encoding H.265, HEVC, H.264 4K H.264, H.265, HEVC, AV1
Cores (compute units, SM, SMX) 48 16
Execution units - 256
Shading units 3,072 2,048
TMUs 192 128
ROPs 96 64
RT cores 48 16
Cache memory 64 MB 8 MB
Pixel fillrate 249.6 GP/s 57.6 GP/s
Texture fillrate 499.2 GT/s 115.2 GT/s
Performance FP16 (half) 63.9 TFLOPS 7.4 TFLOPS
Performance FP32 (float) 31.9 TFLOPS 3.7 TFLOPS
Amazon
eBay






Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.

We can better compare what are the technical differences between the two graphics cards.


Performance comparison with the benchmarks:


Performance comparison between the two processors, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark software such as Geekbench.


FP32 Performance in GFLOPS
AMD Radeon RX 7700 31,949
Intel Arc A550M 3,686


The difference is 767%.


Single-precision floating-point format, also called FP32, is a computer number format that typically occupies 32 bits in PC memory. This represents a wide dynamic range of numeric values that employs a floating point. FP32 power helps assess the video card's capabilities for generating rendering workloads. Video games use INT32 and FP32 cores to manage calculations with integers and numbers with decimals in order to produce maps, bone matrices on which the vertex shaders will calculate the vertices. Values in single precision format are mainly used in video games and 3D software.


See also:

AMD Radeon RX 7700 XTAMD Radeon RX 7700S

Equivalence:

AMD Radeon RX 7700 Nvidia EquivalentIntel Arc A550M Nvidia EquivalentIntel Arc A550M AMD Equivalent




GadgetVersus.com © 2024 - About us - XML sitemap - Privacy policy - Advertising policy - Contact

Disclaimer:

When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

This page includes affiliate links for which the administrator of GadgetVersus may earn a commission at no extra cost to you should you make a purchase. These links are indicated using the hashtag #ad.


Information:

We do not assume any responsibility for the data displayed on our website. Please use at your own risk. Some or all of this data may be out of date or incomplete, please refer to the technical page on the respective manufacturer's website to find the latest up-to-date information regarding the specifics of these products.